Due to the first vote on the #Airdrop🪂 of @Jupiter 🪐 being rejected, a vote has been rethought where some significant changes can be observed in certain issues that concerned the #DAO . What are these changes in this new vote? Let's explore.
The new voting for #jupiter was launched a few hours ago, where the co-founder of Jupiter, weremeow, gave some insights about this new vote in a live broadcast, where several members of the DAO showed their enthusiasm for this new proposal.
As has been mentioned, what they seek with the Jupiter airdrop is for it to reach more people, making the Jupiverse grow in a sustainable way. This does not overlook the community's concerns.
It is for this reason that approval of this new proposal is being sought again through a voting system, where the DAO will have the final say.
What is being voted on?
They are looking to approve 2 Jupiter airdrops (2025-2026), in which the members of the DAO have the option to vote if they feel comfortable with the new proposal or not.
What changes were made in this new proposal?
The first of these is that a portion of the airdrop will be allocated to incentivize holding, buying, and participating in votes throughout the year. The JUP that are not claimed will become part of the ASR, adding long-term value and encouraging active participation.
The second change will be directed to those who stake JUP, as there will be an exclusive portion of the airdrop allocated for them. Additionally, there will be a bonus for consistency, meaning that if you remained active in the votes throughout the year, you will receive an additional bonus.
The third change is related to real users, where they will take into account some important parameters such as participation in the ecosystem, consistency, and your current holdings. Once again, they clarify regarding bots, as they will be excluded.
How will this voting process be approved?
The previous voting system remains, where it is expected that this proposal will be approved with more than 70% of the votes, which would mean that the DAO aligns with what the Jupiter team is proposing.
My decision
Personally, I will vote 'yes' for this new proposal, as they took into account many considerations that were concerning to the DAO. The issue of vesting and locking was a recurring topic in the community, due to its potential impact on the price. Although this issue was not explicitly announced, some mechanisms presented in the proposal could mitigate the impact on the price of #JUP , such as the size of the allocation of #tokens initially and the incentives that will be provided to hold, buy, and vote.
Also, I would like to remind you that this is my personal interpretation, and I recommend reading the proposal thoroughly before voting and conducting your own research.
👉More crypto updates ...
Share and follow me for more 👈😎