Years ago, I also speculated whether we would suddenly make a 180-degree turn in encryption policy in some future year.
However, with deeper and more detailed observations, I gradually realized that the initial idea may have been too simplistic.
The saying 'science knows no borders' is well known. I once extended it to the field of technology, believing that technology also knows no boundaries.
But now I believe that the boundaries of technology are clear and discernible.
Taking encryption technology as an example, certain inherent characteristics (such as permissionless, censorship-resistant, and global free circulation) naturally contradict the systems of certain countries.
In such systems, encryption technology may be able to grow temporarily, but that is only because its characteristics have not yet crossed a red line. Once it crosses the line, its path to growth will suddenly be interrupted.
Under unchanged conditions, it is a fantasy to expect a fundamental transformation of encryption technology in such systems.
If we discard national sentiment and examine solely the characteristics of encryption technology, there are indeed certain countries in the world that are particularly compatible with encryption technology and encrypted assets.
Since the birth of these systems, there has been a force that is highly vigilant against powerful centralized forces. This force has given rise to two value systems:
One belief is that strength can lead the country forward;
The other belief holds that it is the key to stimulating national creativity and shaping the future of the country.
The collision and game of two value systems drive the development of the country. And encryption
What technology requires is precisely the environment created by the second value system.
Although the second value system does not always dominate national processes, it always has opportunities to play a role at certain stages, creating a relaxed and free environment.
In such an environment, encryption technology can grow rapidly. If supplemented with a strong financial foundation, an advantageous market environment, and outstanding technological talent, the country could soon become the global capital of encryption.
Recently, a series of information released by Trump has clearly revealed his substantial actions in encryption policy.
It is rumored that he may establish a government department specifically responsible for encryption affairs.
Moreover, whether it is he himself, his deputy, or the already announced cabinet members (such as the Secretary of the Treasury), they all hold a positive attitude towards encrypted assets.
I believe that when Trump selected cabinet members, he may not have specifically assessed their views on encryption technology, but like-minded individuals tend to gather together. Those he selected naturally share similar values due to his adherence to a certain value system.
Therefore, I increasingly believe that his cabinet will have more highlights in encryption policy.
There is another matter that, while not directly related to Trump, I believe is closely connected to his assumption of office:
On November 22, Pennsylvania passed the (Bitcoin Rights Bill) by a large majority and subsequently proposed the (Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill).
If the (Reserve Bill) passes, Pennsylvania will include Bitcoin in its state reserves. This move may prompt more Republican-controlled states to follow suit.
In fact, whether or not the federal government includes Bitcoin in reserves, as long as there are enough states in the U.S. that do, it is a significant boon for Bitcoin.
Recently, some media believe that Bitcoin's rise has already preemptively exhausted the benefits that the Trump administration is about to bring.
I hold a different view; I believe the climax will come next year, and this round of Bitcoin's rise will not end hastily this year.#BTC☀ 
