After Bitcoin rises to a hundred thousand dollars, it will no longer be something ordinary people can play with. To put it broadly, it may become a game between nations. If it reaches this height, three questions must be considered.

1. Does Bitcoin's market value really need to exceed that of gold? The history of gold is well-known; it has always been hard currency from ancient times to the present. However, Bitcoin has been around for only twenty years and has already challenged gold, which is indeed astonishing.

2. What exactly does the United States want to make of Bitcoin? According to Trump's business personality, Bitcoin may be used to solve America's debt problem. In this regard, Bitcoin's market value is not enough; it needs to continue to scale. However, a problem arises: how to take action? Or how to cut other countries out? Will other countries really foolishly take over Bitcoin worth tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of dollars? I don't think so, because blockchain can be replicated and has no technical content. If the U.S. is involved in Bitcoin, other countries can also create Middle Eastern coins, oil coins, Shanghai Cooperation coins, etc. What if they don't accept it? Then Bitcoin can only be empowered, for example, in the future... (purely speculative) owning one Bitcoin could grant you a green card, etc.

3. Can Bitcoin promote the progress of human civilization? We often say that the cryptocurrency market only transports prices and does not create value. The current mainstream in the crypto space is also meme-based, which does not generate value. So can the blockchain led by Bitcoin promote the progress of human civilization? Can its trust mechanism create some real practical value?