This guy accidentally replied to a post using Satoshi Nakamoto's account. He probably forgot to switch. So he is very likely Satoshi Nakamoto. So why has he refused to admit that he is Satoshi Nakamoto for so many years? Is he worried about his own safety? It is possible. After all, once he admits this identity, he will probably never have peace in his life. HBO documentary lists 7 reasons why Peter Todd is Satoshi Nakamoto, although he has denied it.

On October 9, according to db summary report, HBO believes that Peter Todd is Satoshi Nakamoto (he has denied it):

In 2010, Todd (using a new account) replied to Satoshi Nakamoto on bitcointalk; HBO claimed that he accidentally completed Satoshi's post from his own account

A few days later, both accounts were silent

Todd later implemented the "fee replacement" concept discussed in the post

Claims that Todd used the pseudonym "John Dillon" to promote RBF

Both use British/Canadian spellings

Satoshi Nakamoto's posting time is consistent with the student schedule claimed by the documentary, with more posts on weekends

Todd once discussed "sacrificing" Bitcoin; the document implies that this refers to destroying Satoshi Nakamoto's tokens. $BTC