With a "GM" marking the end of "staking" CZ, CZ's case is still one of the SEC, and this case has been fought. There is a high probability that there will be no changes in the short term, and the case with the SEC will most likely end in a settlement, but it is likely to be calculated on a yearly basis. Apart from this case, CZ has no cases in the United States.

Although CZ may not be able to directly participate in the daily operations of#Binanceafter the final judgment, @cz_binance is still the largest shareholder of Binance and can still have a say in major decisions in shareholder resolutions. So in essence, this lawsuit is to separate CZ from the daily work of Binance. And the core of Binance is still the board of directors centered on CZ.

I can understand the expectations of many friends for CZ, which is the expectation for Binance. I hope that Binance can continue to strengthen under the leadership of CZ. After all, for investors, where the money is, the butt is. The money is placed in Binance, so naturally, people hope that Binance will be better, especially the recent complaints about the listing of coins have caused everyone's dissatisfaction, but the data of Binance shows that it has not weakened under the leadership of @heyibinance and @_RichardTeng.

Assets are the most direct data to measure an exchange. From the data, we can see that from the time CZ entered the United States for trial to his release from prison, the net total assets in Binance have not decreased, but have increased with the change in market sentiment. This shows that "de-CZization" is not a bad thing for users. As long as Binance can still be user-oriented, it is not a problem.

As for CZ himself, it is not necessarily a bad thing to be separated from the daily tedious work. More time should be spent thinking about where Binance's next step is and where the next step of this industry is.