Whether it is the stock market, the real estate market, the cryptocurrency market, or other financial markets, in the process of continuous decline, the participants are actually confused, and basically few people can get out, because the anchor points of the previous day are at the high level of the next day, so they will continue to have a sense of regret of "I should have sold it yesterday", which leads to "I will not sell it today", so they just watch the money fall in a daze without taking any action.

From the historical rules of all financial markets, when the historical bottom rebounds within 15%, the market will run out of several times the number of users, because from their anchor point of view, it has risen, and the long-awaited expectation of "finally losing less" has come true. They are too afraid of the pain of further decline, so they all run out, and the same is true for the cryptocurrency circle. However, the premise of these people running away "falling before dawn" is that the market has really fallen to the bottom, the fundamentals have found a big change, and then encountered an external driving opportunity. At this time, it is unwise to run.

Have A-shares really hit the bottom? Don’t look at the price, look at the structure and fundamentals. First of all, the structure and rules. A-shares are still the same A-shares, without any changes. Secondly, look at the fundamentals. Have young people found jobs? Has domestic demand picked up? Has consumption stopped declining? Do you dare to take out loans? If these have not changed, how can you expect Chinese people to increase their wealth by speculating in stocks?

There are two ways for us to obtain wealth. One is to directly produce value, and the other is to move wealth in the market game through our own cognition and judgment. In a broad sense, this also belongs to value production. After all, only by improving the cognition and judgment of social efficiency can we "earn" money, rather than "gamble" money. But let's distinguish them in a narrow sense. However, even if it is the second way, if you want to move wealth, at least someone has to produce it, right? Now no one produces wealth, this is the key point. Only when you solve this problem can you say that in China, it is more reliable to move wealth through the stock market or the real estate market. First, whether there is, and then you can ask what is the more efficient tool.$SOL $BNB $BTC #本周美国将公布PCE、GDP数据 #新币挖矿已上线HMSTR #AI概念币普涨 #加密市场反弹 #美联储宣布降息50个基点