The Catizen ($CATI) project is getting attention, but not for the right reasons. Imagine putting time and effort into a game, only to get 2 tokens in an airdrop! On the contrary, those who spend large amounts of money on in-game purchases are reaping the rewards. Is this building a real community or just a money-making scheme?
The selective distribution of rewards raises the question: Does Catizen really value players or just the biggest spenders?
Other projects like $NOT and $DOGS have shown generosity to their communities, helping to foster loyalty and growth. But Catizen appears to have taken a different approach.
Could this be a strategic move to stabilize the token price? Some speculate that the Cati token could skyrocket to $1.50 or even $2, making the two tokens much more valuable. However, if things donât go as planned, it could become another example of over-promising and under-delivering, leaving the community disappointed.
Is this a stroke of genius or a misstep? With the Cati token about to enter the market, all eyes are on Catizen. The stakes are high and the community is paying close attention.
