The Catizen project($CATI ) has been gaining attention, but not for the right reasons. Imagine putting time and effort into a game, only to receive just 2 tokens from the airdrop! In contrast, those who spent large sums on in-game purchases are raking in rewards. Is this about building a true community, or is it simply a money grab?
The selective distribution of rewards raises the question: Does Catizen genuinely value its players, or just the highest spenders?
Other projects like $NOT and $DOGS have shown generosity toward their communities, helping to foster loyalty and growth. But Catizen seems to have taken a different approach.
Could this be a strategic move to stabilize token prices? Some speculate the Cati token could surge to $1.50 or even $2, making those 2 tokens much more valuable. However, if things don't go as planned, it could turn into another example of over-promising and under-delivering, leaving the community disappointed.
Is this a stroke of genius or a misstep? With the Cati token about to enter the market, all eyes are on Catizen. The stakes are high, and the community is paying close attention.
What do you think? Is this clever marketing or just a way to benefit the big spenders? Share your thoughts!
â€ïžLIKE đ«FOLLOW đłREQUOTE OR RESHARE
âšïž COMMENT
đ«Remember: A lot of Hardwork goes into for providing you Best Investment Articles.Your Generous Tips would Empower our Mission and help us to work even Harder for you to give Best Investment Advice.
