The simpler the coin issuance, the better? I don't think so. For retail investors: the current market lacks supervision and all projects are issued in advance, with one click. Such projects are basically worthless. Blockchain has the characteristics of anonymity. Many project parties have bad intentions. It can be said that they issue coins just to cut leeks. There are even many Pixiu plates, which can only be bought but not sold. Most of them are launched in a wave, and then return to zero, or contracts with viruses are issued. Not only the leeks in the bowl are cut, but also the pot is taken away. If the wallet accidentally buys a contract with a virus, the U of the entire wallet will be stolen. It is not alarmist. There are too many such examples. I have also experienced it myself. Ordinary retail investors are not recommended to buy uninvestigated primary market local dog meme coins. Making money is an accident among accidents, and losing money is inevitable.
For primary market project parties: the simpler the coin issuance, the better. Just thinking that issuing coins will definitely make money, the quality of project parties varies. You must promote a coin first, otherwise you will buy it yourself? Second, you need to have a good economic model to ensure a good virtuous cycle, otherwise it will be declared over as soon as it goes online, wasting time and money. In addition, you have to make a bottom pool and form an lp. You have to consider this part of the money. Do you really put 100U or 1000U in the pool for your own entertainment? Some people say private placement, yes, but you have to ensure that the people who go online for private placement can make money, otherwise a large number of people will report to the police, can you bear it? Take a step back, even if it goes online, the price of the currency will rise sharply in the early stage, and you will make a lot of money. Once someone sues you in China, you can't avoid stepping on the sewing machine. Conditions for successful coin issuance: 1. Good economic model 2. Good community foundation 3. Superb marketing ability 4. The project party should not be obsessed with cutting, and the mind must be positive. 5. The distribution of tokens must be fair and just. It is difficult for a small number of people to make a lot of tokens. The interests of the community should be put first. The project party should not always think about how much they can make.
