Look at the 3 am article said the short seller guided short speculation at 12 am, at 13 am saw more volume selling.
Let’s take a look at what the previous article says and why it’s so accurate! The attached article is as follows:
Main image text: #BTC
※ Summary before the article: See attached pictures for details
Since the above mentioned on the 27th until the 31st not many owners, by the 31st at 0:00 on time there was a large amount of buying trade turnover.
As mentioned in the previous article on the 31st, the following day or two topped several rebounds or consolidation drag time, so far the price has not changed.
——Future (subsequent):
★ Subsequently, pay attention to whether there is a low range to build a high after 4 am, as mentioned earlier, this high will be pressed at the low price.
Subsequently starting after 12 noon on the 1st, there may be some short sellers mainly guiding short speculation, there is a fall to fall, no fall is normal. After all, when guiding, also some people will be therefore elicited out of the field is just a normal reaction, even if elicited and produce collapse, it is normal, after all, it is to guide used.
And even if there is no price movement, it does not matter, because it is not the use of price judgment steps, interpreting multiple transaction orders as someone quarreling is a kind of absurd nonsense. It is also ridiculous nonsense to interpret that no one makes a transaction as no one in the market. 5,000 Taiwan tourist travel does not mean that there will be 5,000 Taiwan people will go shopping. And did not buy back to people to flip the table, how can it be interpreted as a transaction order?
Regardless of the afternoon guidance, if there is no movement, then the focus will be on the air host after 8 o'clock on the morning of the 2nd, this Monday time.
This can be noted whether it will follow the previous Sunday outbreak similar to Buffett's stock selling or similar financial crisis or NVDA, etc., and then lead to a similar Asian stock market collapse and cause btc to collapse.
Because there is an event at this time, the attribute information of this event belongs to a positive event abnormality, which is generated by an accident. Therefore this should be classified as event multi-master or event null, I do not know which. Anyway, the positive event went wrong and became a collapse.
