Cryptocurrency miners in Texas are being paid by ERCOT to downsize energy use during periods of high demand, sparking discussions on equity and grid stability.
Some critics regard these financial incentives for Bitcoin miners as similar to extortion or bribery while comparing the situation to the Enron scandal.
People are now demanding more severe measures and crackdowns on Bitcoin miners to be imposed by governments in order to avoid possible disturbances of energy grids.
Bitcoin mining has been criticized for being resource-intensive and contributing to environmental degradation. It has been criticized recently, and the more recent criticism has resulted from the monetary inducements given by Texas’s ERCOT. The council, which regulates the electricity supply in Texas, has been said to have paid Bitcoin miners not to mine during certain high-demand days. This action has led to controversy among the critics, stating that these payments are, in effect, paying miners for not using electricity, which has raised issues of responsibility among miners.
https://twitter.com/curious_founder/status/1828511303788322888
One of the ways through which ERCOT plans to regulate electricity demand is by paying Bitcoin miners to lower their power consumption during times of high demand. This was evident when Riot Platforms, a Bitcoin mining firm, earned more from ERCOT for reducing their output than mining. Although the purpose of this strategy is to maintain the stability of the grid and to avoid blackouts, it has received criticism from different people and groups, with some referring to it as “extortion.”
Criticism and Comparisons From Industry Observers
Some critics have pointed out that these payments afford undue benefits to Bitcoin miners and are antithetical to the state’s energy conservation goals. Robert Evans, an American author and journalist, has described this practice as “bribery,” arguing that miners are being paid not to threaten the grid.
Some, including Ed Zitron, the CEO of media relations firm EZPR, have expressed concern and noted that miners should instead be punished for the energy they use rather than incentivized.
Many analysts have compared the situation to previous corporate fraud. Tankus, an economist, drew a parallel between the current Bitcoin mining system and Enron’s infamous “ghost orders,” whereby the corporation generated income from operations that were never actually conducted. Some analysts have argued that Bitcoin miners are also doing this by earning revenues from their agreements, not mine.
The post Bitcoin Miners Rake in Millions Without Lifting a Finger—Is It Extortion? appeared first on Crypto News Land.
