🚧 As a Web3 founder, I've seen how technology can stretch the boundaries of the rules people have set up. This stretch is often misunderstood.

When digital currencies first appeared, they faced a lot of criticism because, yes, some criminals used them for transactions. But here's the thing: digital currencies offer a new way to handle finance and transactions that can benefit us all.

The presence of misuse doesn’t diminish their potential value. Before crypto, criminals were using cash or complex bank transfers.

Technology doesn’t create crime; it just changes the tools.

The same logic applies to Telegram. It was designed to give people a sense of security and privacy in their conversations. Sure, criminals can use it too, but they'll exploit any technology available to them.

🚩 Should we start banning progress because of potential misuse?