There are two hot directions in the market at present:

1️⃣#Babylon

@babylonlabs_io

with star investment lineup such as Binance and OK, and many Bitcoin re-pledge protocols have also been derived based on the Babylon protocol;

2️⃣#FractalBitcoin

@fractal_bitcoin

co-founded by Unisat and others, the fractal Bitcoin concept, a series of ecological projects were born based on the fractal Bitcoin network, almost re-walking the inscription road.

🌴Selling point🌴:

#Babylon's selling point is Bitcoin re-pledge to increase Bitcoin liquidity.#FractalBitcoin's selling point is to develop a BTC side chain to increase the speed of exchanges. The answer obtained according to the marketing plan is that it is ten times faster than the BTC main network transaction speed.

🌴Viewpoint🌴:

Re-walking the Long March Road, lack of innovation, changing the previous gameplay to continue playing, I don't quite understand what the big difference is between Babylon and Merlin? Is it just a technical difference? I think this is probably just a concept that can be hyped. Moreover, for POW Bitcoin, I personally think that BTC's LSD and Restaking are a bit far-fetched. Just like SATS, the basic unit of Bitcoin is Satoshi, but this Satoshi has nothing to do with the $SATS token, so what is the big relationship between Bitcoin LSD and POW?

Bitcoin's main focus is to increase transaction speed. In fact, I think this is a pseudo-concept for the time being. The Bitcoin network does not have a virtual machine, and the speed requirement is not that high. Even if the transaction speed is increased, for example, the speed of casting inscriptions on the main network is increased, that is, everyone has increased, which will only make it more competitive. I think the Bitcoin network needs security rather than transaction speed.

No matter how much analysis is done, it is useless. There is no absolute right or wrong in this market. Whether there is a development prospect depends on whether capital is willing to promote it.