I went to look up the original foreign text for this question.
Roughly translated, it's what's described in the picture. Nothing new.
These are things that everyone knows.
If you can reach 1 million in 26 years, then working backwards, you need at least 500,000 in 25 years and 200,000 in 24 years.
If it doesn't rise to 100,000 this year, isn't it a bit unreasonable?
