Written by: Yangz, Techub News

Recently, major KOLs on CT discussed the question raised by Hasu, "Why are transactions on Solana still dominated by AMM (automated market makers) rather than CLOB (centralized limit order book)?" People wonder that based on the efficient performance chain that can process thousands of transactions per second, DEX on Solana can completely adopt the order book model to provide low-slippage transactions, but current data shows that the market's choice is DEX that adopts the AMM mechanism. According to the Dune dashboard data created by @ilemi, as of the time of writing, the total transaction volume of DEX on Solana is approximately US$499.08 billion. In terms of market share, Raydium and Orca, which use the AMM model, account for most of the transactions with a ratio of 41.5% and 34.5% respectively, while Phoenix and Lifinity, which use the CLOB model, account for only 5.1% and 6%. In addition, judging from the transaction volume data, the transaction volume of the former two is also several times that of the latter two. Regarding this phenomenon, Multicoin managing partner Kyle Samani commented on Hasu’s tweet, saying that “long-tail assets lack order book market makers.” Considering the popularity of memecoin in the Solana ecosystem, Samani’s implication is that most of the trading volume of DEXs that adopt the AMM mechanism on Solana comes from memecoin. However, Doug Colkitt, founder of the decentralized trading platform Ambient Finance, countered this kind of explanation that attributes the reason to memecoin, saying, “Most people think that ‘all Solana AMM trading volume comes from long-tail assets’, but these analyses are wrong. Just use your brain and spend 30 seconds to verify it.” 

Colkitt explained that in the past 24 hours, Orca (AMM) alone had $250 million in trading volume for its two largest SOL/USDC pairs. In comparison, the two largest SOL/USD pairs on Phoenix (CLOB) had trading volume of about $14 million. In addition, he joked that "maybe many CLOB market makers are not working on weekends", so he checked the 7d average daily trading volume of the above trading pairs on Phoenix, and the result was only $168 million. Colkitt also pointed out that any trader who has used Jupiter for SOL and USDC trading knows that while Phoenix and Lifinity perform well, in most cases, normal-sized transactions are conducted through Orca or Raydium. (Note: Kyle Samani admitted his mistake after seeing Colkitt's above analysis, saying that he "does not trade SOL-USD, only stakes and holds.")

Colkitt concluded that even on a high-performance network like Solana, and on a currency pair like SOL/USD that has high liquidity, high trading volume, and is attractive to HFT market makers, AMMs are still extremely competitive and are still largely the default on-chain trading method.  So, since memecoin is not the trigger for this phenomenon, what is the real reason behind it?  Most KOLs attribute the reason to the advantages of AMMs over CLOBs.

Guillaume Lambert, founder of Panoptic, a DeFi protocol based on Uniswap, said, "AMM is first and foremost a product for teams/LPs/token issuers. No one wants to manage an order book, and LPing is much easier." Similar to Lambert, former Spartan Capital general partner Jason Choi also pointed out that this is because "teams/memes can more easily issue tokens through AMM pools." In addition, Electric Capital's @sidmvenkat analyzed the attributes of assets in the current Solana ecosystem. He said, “For larger and more mature assets, traders can benefit from the CLOB model. Once the asset is large enough, ‘experienced’ participants have reason to start making markets for it; and most of the assets on Solana are newer assets, so it is easier to establish liquidity using the AMM mechanism.” Peter Kris of the cross-chain trading protocol Gasp even rose to the perspective of industry value. He believes that the problem with CLOB is that it is inconsistent with Crypto value. “The liquidity provided on CLOB is concentrated in the hands of a few experienced players, while AMM allows everyone to be a market maker. The rewards are distributed fairly, and capital (liquidity) is not in the hands of a few people.”

In addition, a more interesting point is the "background" of the development of Solana ecosystem DEX raised by X user @youyouAllen. He pointed out that "Solana's order book at the time was actually mainly due to the will of the afro that influenced the direction of developers. Now that SBF has entered, the market has returned to the real user needs. It was the market that ultimately chose AMM."Indeed, as ordinary investors, we may not need to delve into this phenomenon. The so-called "standard answer" is nothing more than the market's choice. The simplest conclusion is that, as far as the current situation is concerned, AMM may be more suitable for Solana ecosystem DEX than CLOB. From a higher level, discussions like the AMM and CLOB debate will be of great benefit to the current bleak DeFi ecosystem. Paradigm research partner Frankie commented, "Couple more AMM vs CLOB debates then up only."

Author: TechubNews; from the ChainDD content open platform "DeDeHao", this article only represents the author's point of view, not the official position of ChainDD. For all "DeDeHao" articles, the originality and authenticity of the content are guaranteed by the contributors. If the article is plagiarized, falsified, etc., the legal consequences will be borne by the contributors themselves. If there are any infringements, violations, or other inappropriate remarks on the DeDeHao platform, please supervise the readers. Once confirmed, the platform will be offline immediately. If you encounter any problems with the content of the article, please contact WeChat: chaindd123