Ethereum ETF is expected to have less impact than Bitcoin ETF
According to SoSoValue's continuous tracking of Bitcoin spot ETFs, the factor that has the greatest impact on the price of the currency is the daily net inflow, that is, the actual increase in the scale of buying/selling orders brought to the crypto world by the cash subscription and redemption of Bitcoin spot ETFs (see Figure 1 for details), which affects supply and demand and determines the price. According to the S-1 document, the subscription and redemption mechanism of the US Ethereum spot ETF is the same as that of the Bitcoin spot ETF, and both only support cash subscription and redemption. Therefore, the daily net inflow will also be the most important observation indicator for the Ethereum spot ETF; there are two main differences:
Selling: Due to the more than 10 times difference in management fees of Grayscale Ethereum Trust (stock code ETHE), the selling effect brought about by the relocation effect is still there; and after experiencing the Bitcoin mistake caused by the outflow of Grayscale GBTC, the market is also prepared for the outflow of Grayscale ETHE. However, unlike the Bitcoin ETF, the Grayscale Ethereum Trust split 10% of its net assets in the process of converting to an ETF to establish a low-fee Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (stock code ETH), so the selling may be slightly reduced.
Buying: Since Ethereum ETFs do not allow staking from a regulatory perspective, holding Ethereum ETFs will result in 3%-5% less staking mining income (risk-free rate of return in the Ethereum world) than directly holding Ethereum tokens. At the same time, the public investors’ awareness of Ethereum is lower than that of Bitcoin. If they are optimistic about cryptocurrencies, they will still prefer Bitcoin ETFs, which have a clear scarcity and only 21 million units.
Figure 1: Decomposition of the impact of net outflows on Bitcoin prices in the initial stage of Ethereum spot ETF listing (data source: SoSoValue)
1. Selling: Grayscale ETHE with a management fee of 9.2 billion US dollars, 10 times the difference with its competitors, will still bring early relocation selling, but it will be less than the impact of GBTC outflow
Looking back at the early stage of the Grayscale Bitcoin ETF (GBTC), there were two reasons for the large net outflows: on the one hand, the management fee was significantly higher than that of competitors, which brought about a relocation effect. Investors started from Grayscale Bitcoin with a management fee of 1.5%. To redeem the currency ETF, buy other ETFs with a management fee of about 0.2%; on the other hand, early trust discount arbitrage, profit-taking after the ETF price leveled, brought about sales. At the beginning of the year, the ETF directly converted from Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC asset management scale of 28.4 billion US dollars) was listed, and there was a sustained large-scale net outflow of funds. There are two main core reasons. First, the management fee of Grayscale GBTC is 1.5%, which is about 6 times that of competitors, which makes investors who are optimistic about Bitcoin assets in the long term move their positions to other ETFs; second, before GBTC is converted into ETF, The discount has remained around 20% for a long time, stimulating investors to arbitrage the discount rate by buying discounted GBTC and shorting BTC on the market. After the discount from trusts converted to ETFs basically disappeared, such arbitrage funds sold ETFs and took profits. According to SoSoValue data, the net outflow of GBTC lasted from January 11 to May 2, and then slowed down, during which its Bitcoin holdings decreased by 53%.
Figure 2: Net outflow of GBTC since its listing (data source: SoSoValue)
Unlike the direct conversion of GBTC, Grayscale will simultaneously split 10% of its net assets to establish a low-fee Ethereum Mini ETF (stock code ETH) during the conversion of the Ethereum Trust to an ETF. That is, Grayscale will have two Ethereum ETFs with management fees of 2.5% and 0.15% respectively, which slightly alleviates the pressure of outflow caused by high fees. According to the S-1 document, the Grayscale Ethereum Trust (stock code: ETHE) will transfer about 10% of Ethereum to the Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (stock code: ETH) as the initial funds for the Mini Trust ETH; after that, the two Grayscale Ethereum ETFs will operate independently. For investors who already hold ETHE, on July 23, each share of Ethereum Trust ETHE held by them will automatically be allocated 1 share of Ethereum Mini Trust ETH, and the net value of ETHE will be adjusted to 90% of the previous amount. Considering that the management fee rate of ETHE is 2.5%; the management fee rate of Mini Trust ETH is 0.15% (no management fee within US$2 billion in the first 6 months), that is to say, for existing ETHE investors, 10% of their assets will be automatically allocated to low-fee ETFs. Referring to the fact that the final fund transfer ratio of GBTC is about 50%, it is expected that the spin-off launch of Ethereum Mini Trust ETH and the early bird discount of management fees will ease the short-term fund outflow pressure of Grayscale ETHE.
On the other hand, because the ETHE discount converged ahead of time, the outflow pressure caused by the liquidation of discounted arbitrage positions is also expected to be smaller than that of GBTC. Grayscale ETHE was once greatly discounted, with a discount of up to 60% at the end of 2022, and a discount of more than 20% in April-May 2024, but the discount began to converge to 1%-2% at the end of May, and converged to less than 1% in July; while GBTC's discount rate remained at 6.5% 2 days before its conversion to ETF (January 9). Therefore, for arbitrageurs, the motivation for ETHE to take profits is greatly reduced.
Figure 3: Comparison of Ethereum spot ETF rates (data source: S-1 filing)
Figure 4: Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETHE historical discount (data source: Bloomberg)
2. Buying power from the stock market: The public consensus on Ethereum is far less than that on Bitcoin, and the asset allocation momentum is smaller than that of BTC spot ETF
For the general public investors, the logic of Bitcoin is simple and easy to understand, and the consensus has been reached: the gold in the digital world has a clear scarcity and a total of 21 million coins, so it fits their existing investment framework very well; while Ethereum, as the largest basic public chain, has a relatively complex mining mechanism, and its development is affected by multiple forces in the ecosystem. The most important thing is the supply quantity as an investment target, which involves inflation and deflation at all times. The calculation process is dynamic and complex, and the cognitive threshold is high, which is difficult for ordinary investors to understand intuitively. In short, on the one hand, from the supply perspective, Ethereum has an unlimited supply in principle. Under the latest POS mechanism, the staking income brought by block rewards drives its supply to increase, and the user transaction gas fee burning affected by the on-chain ecological activity drives its supply to decrease, thereby forming a dynamic supply and demand balance mechanism; the latest supply is about 120 million coins, and the recent annualized inflation rate is 0.6%-0.8%. On the other hand, from the conventional fundamental perspective, as a public chain, it faces competition from other public chains, and the general public investors do not have faith in the final outcome of the competition. There are public chain ecosystems such as Solana and Ton on the market, which are also known to the general public investors. However, if we analyze their competitiveness in detail, the threshold for general public investors is extremely high. Therefore, if ordinary investors are optimistic about the investment value of cryptocurrencies, they may still prefer to configure Bitcoin spot ETFs with scarce supply and no competition.
Public data also shows a significant difference in popularity between Ethereum ETF and Bitcoin ETF. Comparing Google search popularity, which represents public attention, Ethereum is only about 1/5 of Bitcoin (see Figure 5 for details); and observe the seed funds issued by the Ethereum ETF (generally funded by fund managers/underwriters) , Fidelity’s seed capital for its Ethereum ETF (stock code FETH) is only 1/4 of its Bitcoin ETF (stock code FBTC), and the gap is also large for other issuers such as VanEck and Invesco (see Figure 6 for details) .
Figure 5: Comparison of Google search popularity of Bitcoin and Ethereum (data source: Google Trend)
Figure 6: Comparison of seed funding size of Ethereum ETF and Bitcoin ETF under the same issuer (data source: S-1 filing)
3. Buying from the crypto community: Due to the lack of a 3%-5% basic staking yield on the ETH chain, demand is basically non-existent
Crypto investors also contributed to some of the buying of Bitcoin spot ETFs, mainly due to the need for proof of real-world assets. Crypto investors holding Bitcoin ETFs only need to pay an annual fee of 0.2%-0.25% to have proof of assets in the traditional financial market, which is convenient for economic life in the mass world, balancing financial assets and Bitcoin holdings, and using this to conduct various leverage operations, such as mortgage lending, building structured products, etc., which is attractive to some high-net-worth crypto investors. Since Bitcoin is a POW mining mechanism, there is no stable POS asset pledge income. Considering that the average deposit and withdrawal costs of cryptocurrencies and fiat currencies are 0.2%, the difference in income between holding Bitcoin ETFs and directly holding coins is not large.
However, for Ethereum spot ETFs, since regulation does not allow ETFs to obtain staking income, for crypto investors, holding ETFs will result in 3%-5% less risk-free annualized returns than directly holding Ethereum spot. Ethereum uses the PoS (Proof of Stake) mechanism, which verifies transactions and maintains the network by staking Ethereum assets through validator nodes, and obtains block rewards, which is the so-called POS mining mechanism. Since this income comes from the network protocol and the system's built-in reward mechanism, it is regarded as the Ethereum ecosystem's on-chain risk-free basic yield. Recently, the Ethereum staking yield has stabilized at more than 3%. Therefore, if the Ethereum position configuration is realized through ETFs, the annualized yield will be at least 3% less than directly holding Ethereum spot. Therefore, the buying of Ethereum spot ETFs by high-net-worth people in the crypto circle can be ignored.
Figure 7: Staking yield since Ethereum switched to POS mechanism (data source: The Staking Explorer)
2. In the long run: Ethereum ETF paves the way for other crypto assets to integrate into the mainstream world
As the largest public blockchain, the approval of Ethereum’s spot ETF is an important step for the public blockchain to integrate into the mainstream financial world. After reviewing the SEC’s standards for approving cryptocurrency ETFs, Ethereum meets the SEC’s requirements in terms of anti-manipulation, liquidity, and pricing transparency. We can expect more crypto assets that meet the requirements to enter the public investor’s field of vision through spot ETFs.
Anti-manipulation: On the one hand, the nodes on the chain are sufficiently dispersed, and the ETF assets are not pledged. The number of Ethereum nodes exceeds 4,000, which prevents a single node from controlling the entire network; in addition, Ethereum spot ETFs do not allow pledges to prevent excessive control of the network by a few entities due to the pledge mechanism. On the other hand, in the financial market, Ethereum's basic trading facilities are relatively mature, especially its rich futures products on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), which provides investors with more hedging options and price predictability, reducing the risk of market manipulation.
Liquidity & pricing transparency: Ethereum has a market value of approximately US$420 billion. Looking at the market value alone, it can be ranked in the top 20 of the US stock market capitalization ranking. Ethereum's 24-hour trading volume is US$18 billion, and it is listed on nearly 200 exchanges, ensuring sufficient liquidity and fair and transparent pricing.
In comparison, Solana in the public chain also meets the above indicators to a certain extent (see Figure 8 for details). Vaneck and 21Shares have successively submitted applications for Solana spot ETF. With the continuous enrichment of traditional financial market tools such as cryptocurrency futures, we can expect more crypto asset ETFs to be approved in the future, thereby further occupying the minds of traditional investors, entering the market and accelerating development.
Figure 8: Comparison of core data of representative Layer 1 public chains (data source: public data compilation)
In summary, since the buying and selling power of Ethereum spot ETF is weaker than that of Bitcoin ETF, and the market has experienced the mistaken killing of Bitcoin caused by the outflow of Grayscale GBTC, it is also prepared for the outflow of Grayscale ETHE. In addition, it has been 6 months since the listing of Bitcoin spot ETF. The positive news of the approval of Ethereum spot ETF has been reflected in the current Ethereum price to a large extent after repeated market transactions. It is expected that the short-term impact on the price of Ethereum will be smaller than the impact of the previous listing of Bitcoin spot ETF on Bitcoin, and the volatility of Ethereum may also be smaller. If there is another mistaken killing due to Grayscale outflow in the early stage of listing, it will be a good layout opportunity.
Investors can follow the US Ethereum spot ETF dashboard specially launched by SoSoValue.
In the long run, the crypto ecosystem and the mainstream world are moving from their past separate development to integration, and there will be a long period of cognitive adjustment in the middle. The difference in cognition between the new and old participants in the crypto ecosystem may be the core factor affecting the price fluctuations of cryptocurrencies and creating investment opportunities in the next 1-2 years. Historically, the process of emerging assets integrating into the mainstream world has always seen divergences and transactions, and large fluctuations have continuously brought investment opportunities, which is worth looking forward to.
The approval of Ethereum ETF further opens the way for crypto-ecological applications to enter mainstream asset allocation. It can be foreseen that other infrastructures such as Solana, which have a large number of users and ecosystems, will also gradually integrate into the mainstream world. While the crypto world is entering the mainstream world, the other side of the times, that is, the process of the mainstream world entering the crypto world, is also quietly continuing to develop. Mainstream financial assets, mainly U.S. Treasury bonds, are also on the chain in the form of RWA (Real World Assets) tokens, gradually entering the crypto world, realizing the efficient circulation of global financial assets.
If the approval of the Bitcoin ETF opens the door to a new world of integration of encryption and tradition, then the approval of the Ethereum ETF is the first step into the door.
