In my opinion, the so-called liquidation selling pressure from governments is actually limited. It is just the material used by short sellers to make profits by smashing the market. Just like there is no fish in fish-flavored pork shreds, no husband and wife in husband and wife lung slices, and no wife in wife cakes, don't really think that the things advertised in the media are really the main ingredients of this dish just because you hear the name of a dish.
This round of bull market came too early. If you get up too fast, you will easily feel dizzy, and you may even stumble if you are not careful. In the currency circle, only those who are ready to die and live to the end are worthy of living and smiling to the end.
The theory of quick victory, the idea of wanting to make money as soon as you enter the market is naive. On the contrary, the theory of surrender, that is, the view that since this round of bull market started a year in advance, it will end a year in advance, that is, the view that Game Over will be at the end of 2024, is also absurd.
What's even funnier is that the argument given by those who hold the theory of surrender is that the Federal Reserve will start to cut interest rates in the second half of the year. And the interest rate cut will be accompanied by a market collapse, thus sending away the bull market.
Do you think that the unprecedented rate hikes by the Federal Reserve in the past two years have not been able to drive away the bull market? Could it be that its shift to easing and restarting the money supply will drive away the bull market instead of boosting the violent bull market?
"If you are still underwater and cannot see the market trend clearly, the market will fall if you are bullish and rise if you are bearish, follow my homepage clippings and share the profit code for free every day"
We have always opposed the illusion of quick victory and criticized the absurdity of surrender. Only a protracted war is the most correct strategy.
