BRC-20 polarized discussion

This proposal has aroused different opinions among core developers. Some people are opposed to it, thinking that it will affect the income of miners and may promote the use of private memory pools. Miners may not adopt this update; those who support it believe that doing so will To increase the burden on operating nodes, the following summarizes the respective positions of the two parties:

support:

In addition to transfers, it opens up new usage scenarios on the Bitcoin blockchain. High handling fees increase miners’ income, and it helps Bitcoin’s security budget achieve freedom of speech on a truly decentralized network. Market mechanisms will eventually solve the current problem. congestion problem

be opposed to:

Bitcoin (Digital Gold) should not be used for other applications. The Bitcoin blockchain is congested, wasting a lot of block space, and block generation fees were once suspended. The number of active users has dropped to the level of 2021/07, hindering price-sensitive users from adopting Bitcoin. The coin-token protocol has not been fully tested and its security is worrying. BRC-20 is a technically poor standard that cannot be properly integrated into wider DeFi #BRC20