The biggest innovation of blast may be the airdrop mode. At the same time, it also makes good use of the token incentive characteristics in the crypto field. 50% of the tokens are distributed to the community, the cycle is extended, and users are allowed to directly gamble through some complex methods. Isn't this in line with Bitcoin's POW mining mechanism? I have always believed that the biggest feature of the crypto field is to change the production relationship, and how to change it is to make everyone a shareholder of this project through the distribution of tokens. However, it is a pity that so many crypto projects claim to be the first in the community. In fact, the token has only one governance function, and the distribution of this token is also extremely centralized. The right to interpret the airdrop belongs to the project party, and the right to distribute grants belongs to the foundation. Only blast clarifies the rules, and you can try to see your own points.

But apart from this point, blast is useless. As a layer2, it does not even have basic technical guarantees. How can it operate for a long time?