The Awkward Kamala Harris Interview: A Closer Look
Recently, a somewhat awkward interview involving Vice President Kamala Harris has stirred conversations. During the interview, Harris's responses and the overall exchange led to moments that were perceived as uncomfortable or unclear by some viewers.
The interview's content ranged from policy discussions to personal reflections, but it was the delivery and the interaction dynamics that captured the most attention. These moments of awkwardness have sparked a broader dialogue about media training, political communication, and public perception.
As the political landscape continues to evolve, such interviews often become focal points for analyzing the effectiveness of public figures' communication strategies. For those interested in the intersection of politics and media, this interview serves as a compelling case study in how public interactions can influence political discourse and public opinion.
Engage with the conversation and share your thoughts on how such interviews impact political communication. What strategies could be employed to improve clarity and comfort in high-stakes interviews?#kamala #Gravity #BitcoinTherapist #inrerview

Surpassing her rival Donald Trump as the election approaches. Recent data reveals that six out of seven pivotal battleground states experienced more robust economic growth than the national average in the second quarter, enhancing Harris's reputation.

The economy is the top priority for voters at this moment, and Harris is actively communicating her commitment to addressing it. States like Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, crucial to securing a presidential victory, reported the highest GDP increases in the country, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Both Michigan and Wisconsin saw a noteworthy growth rate of 4.1% each, while Pennsylvania followed closely with a 3.1% increase. Conversely, Nevada trailed with a growth rate of 1.7%, hindered by struggles in its hospitality and tourism sectors.

Traditionally viewed as the "economy president," Trump's stronghold on economic issues is being challenged by Harris. A Bloomberg/Morning Consult poll indicates a close race between Harris and Trump in swing states concerning their ability to manage the rising cost of living, with Harris slightly ahead in perceptions of support for the middle class by 12 points.

Harris is also resonating with vital voter demographics. According to a CNN survey, she leads among independents with 46% support versus Trump's 40%, and she is particularly popular with younger voters under 30, securing 56% of their support. Among racial groups, Harris holds 80% of the Black vote and 60% among Latinos, while Trump lags at 39%. The gender split shows independent women favoring Harris at 52%, whereas independent men slightly prefer Trump at 46%.

Inflation remains a critical concern, with 56% of voters identifying it as their primary worry. In response, Harris has unveiled an extensive 83-page economic strategy focusing on middle-class benefits, advocating for tax incentives for individuals and proposing increased taxes on corporations that avoid supporting union jobs. She emphasizes the promotion of green energy as a significant job creator.

Meanwhile, Trump remains committed to his traditional economic strategies, emphasizing corporate tax reductions to stimulate hiring. Despite his appeal with a segment of the electorate, a CNBC poll of chief financial officers reveals mixed opinions: while 56% think Trump would better manage inflation, many still foresee a Harris victory in the upcoming election.

#kamalaHarris #kamala #donaldtrump #BTCReboundsAfterFOMC #moonbix

A proposed 25% tax on unrealized gains would undoubtedly stir significant controversy, and if Vice President Kamala Harris were to support such a measure, it could lead to substantial backlash. Unrealized gains refer to the increase in value of an asset that has not yet been sold. Taxing these gains before they are realized could be seen as unfair, as it forces individuals to pay taxes on income they have not actually received.
Critics argue that this type of taxation could particularly hurt small investors, retirees, and those who rely on long-term investments for financial security. It might also create economic instability, as investors could be forced to sell assets prematurely to cover the tax bill, potentially leading to market volatility.
Furthermore, implementing such a tax would be administratively complex and could face legal challenges. Many see it as a radical departure from traditional tax principles, where taxes are typically levied on actual income or profits.
If Kamala Harris were to push for such a policy, it could alienate moderate voters and further polarize the political landscape, leading to significant opposition and potentially harming her political standing.#KamalaHarris2024 #Texas #VOTEme #kamala

The 2024 U.S. presidential race presents an interesting dynamic, with cryptocurrency emerging as a significant topic of interest, particularly for candidates like Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. Both Trump and Harris have been subtly or directly positioning themselves to appeal to the growing number of crypto enthusiasts and investors, recognizing that this community represents not only technological innovation but also political influence.

Donald Trump’s Crypto Stance: Evolving and Strategic
Historically, Donald Trump has been a vocal critic of cryptocurrencies. In 2019, during his first term as President, he tweeted that he was "not a fan of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies" because they could facilitate illicit activities and undermine the U.S. dollar. However, Trump’s stance on cryptocurrency has softened somewhat, particularly after it was revealed that his wife, Melania Trump, had endorsed NFTs in 2021. Additionally, Trump himself reportedly held between $250,000 and $500,000 worth of Ethereum in 2023, marking a potential shift in his view towards digital assets.
Trump’s appeal to the crypto community could be strategic. With the increasing importance of blockchain technology and its growing influence on global finance, Trump might see a political advantage in courting this voter base. While he remains skeptical of the potential risks associated with decentralized currencies, his recent actions suggest that he may adopt a more favorable approach toward crypto, possibly focusing on regulated development rather than outright rejection.

Kamala Harris: A Focus on Blockchain Innovation
Vice President Kamala Harris, in contrast, has taken a more progressive stance towards cryptocurrency and blockchain technology. While she has not made as many direct public comments about Bitcoin or Ethereum, Harris has championed tech innovation as a broader theme in her career. As a former attorney general of California, Harris was at the forefront of legal cases involving tech companies, making her well-versed in the regulatory landscape that surrounds emerging technologies.
In recent years, Harris’s team has shown interest in the potential benefits of blockchain, particularly in areas like decentralized finance (DeFi) and digital inclusion. Given her track record in pushing for equitable technological access, Harris might position herself as a candidate who supports the responsible integration of blockchain to foster innovation, protect consumers, and address wealth inequality. This aligns with the Democratic Party's broader outlook on fintech, which often focuses on promoting innovation while ensuring robust regulation.

Crypto Community’s Divided Support
The crypto community’s support is likely to be divided between Trump and Harris, reflecting their differing approaches. Trump’s populist appeal and his potential softening on cryptocurrency regulation could resonate with libertarians and Bitcoin maximalists who favor less government interference. On the other hand, Harris’s forward-thinking approach to blockchain innovation might attract those interested in the more progressive and equitable applications of the technology, such as DeFi and the role of crypto in remittances and financial inclusion.

Regulatory Challenges and the Crypto Market
Both candidates will face the ongoing regulatory challenge that has increasingly come to define the U.S. government’s relationship with cryptocurrency. Trump, if elected, may push for more lenient regulation, aligning with his broader deregulatory stance seen during his first term. However, given the volatility of the crypto markets and the FTX collapse in late 2022, Trump will likely have to balance fostering innovation with ensuring the security of the financial system.
Harris, on the other hand, is expected to advocate for comprehensive crypto regulation to protect investors while still encouraging blockchain innovation. Her potential policies could focus on creating clear legal frameworks for companies, fostering crypto innovation while safeguarding consumers against the risks associated with volatile digital assets.

Conclusion
The 2024 presidential race could see cryptocurrency becoming a central issue as candidates like Trump and Harris vie for the attention of this growing sector. Trump’s evolving stance on crypto reflects his desire to appeal to a libertarian and free-market base, while Harris’s focus on blockchain innovation aligns with her progressive vision for technology’s role in society. Both candidates will need to strike a delicate balance between encouraging innovation and implementing necessary regulatory safeguards as they seek to win over crypto enthusiasts.
#MemeCoinTrending #Debate2024 #TrumpCryptoSupport #kamala
$MANA $AXS $DIA

The US presidential elections have always been a major economic and geopolitical event with a massive impact on the American economy and the world. The election of the right president can make or break a market, that’s why the elections are crucial for crypto.

Many believe that the election of Donald Trump, the candidate from the Republican party, will mark the start of a bull run for crypto and other financial instruments. That’s not only because of his stance on Web3 regulation and Bitcoin, but also because of its macroeconomics and geopolitical decisions. 
In this article, we’ll give you a comprehensive review of the candidate’s political stances and five different ways the 2024 US elections could impact the crypto world. Enjoy! 
Where Do Trump and Harris Stand on Crypto? 
We have two opposite candidates in the run for presidency. Let’s see where they stand on crypto and regulations:
Donald Trump
By 2024, Trump changed his approach, aiming to capture the support of crypto enthusiasts and significant donors in the industry. 
At the Bitcoin 2024 conference in Nashville, Trump announced his ambition to make the U.S. the “crypto capital of the planet” and a global Bitcoin superpower. He even introduced policies aimed at promoting the cryptocurrency sector, including a government Bitcoin stockpile and the formation of a Bitcoin and crypto presidential advisory council.
Trump's campaign now accepts Bitcoin donations, and he has embraced digital assets by launching NFT trading cards that depict him in various settings, including as a superhero with Bitcoin. His vice-presidential running mate, Senator J.D. Vance, is also a strong supporter of cryptocurrency.
Moreover, as of September 17, Donald Trump has officially launched his new crypto project, World Liberty Financial, just one day after surviving a second assassination attempt. The project aims to provide borrowing and lending services for cryptos on the Ethereum blockchain.
During a live interview with Rug Radio, Trump’s team revealed new details about World Liberty Financial. They emphasized that the platform would be more "user-friendly" and accessible than other, more technical DeFi applications. Unlike typical DeFi projects, World Liberty Financial will be powered by a non-transferable governance token called WLFI, meaning users won't be able to trade it.
While the full details of Trump’s project remain unclear, World Liberty Financial promises to simplify DeFi services and make them more accessible to the broader public. Trump has criticized the idea of a U.S. CBDC, calling it a "threat to freedom." He has voiced opposition to the Federal Reserve creating such a currency, aligning himself with crypto advocates who oppose the potential government control that a CBDC might bring.
His campaign’s pro-crypto stance has drawn attention from figures in the industry, and Trump appears to have been influenced by former Republican candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, known for his support of digital assets. Trump also promised to reduce taxes, particularly lowering the capital gains tax, which would directly impact cryptocurrency investors.
Kamala Harris
Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee and current Vice President, has not yet taken a definitive public stance on cryptocurrency. 
However, her position may align with the approach taken by the Biden administration, which has seen increased legal engagement with the crypto sector. Under President Biden, the crypto sector has been under continuous pressure from every legal institution in the United States, starting from the SEC and ending with the DoJ. 
After the FTX collapse, the SEC hit the crypto industry with a massive wave of lawsuits, accusing top-notch crypto companies of bypassing fundamental investor protections. The two biggest ones were registered against Coinbase and Binance. The attacks on crypto continued as the SEC tried to block the appearance of a Bitcoin ETF. However, the decision was overruled by a federal judge in 2023, and now we have Bitcoin AND Ethereum ETFs around. 
Later that year, in September, the White House released a more detailed framework to guide the responsible development of crypto. It sought to unify the government’s approach to managing crypto risks and maximizing its potential benefits. By many, this framework was seen as a turning point in the Democrats’ relationship with crypto. 
Now, despite the lack of an official stance, Harris’ background in California’s tech industry and recent meetings with crypto leaders suggest she might adopt a moderate approach. 
Notably, she was publicly supported by JP Thieriot, a board member of the crypto platform Uphold, and has engaged with crypto Democrats through events like the "townhall" hosted by Crypto4Harris, a group that advocates for her within the industry.
Crypto Funds the US Politics 
Cryptocurrency's influence in U.S. politics has surged, marked by a staggering 1386% increase in lobbying expenditure over the last seven years. Since 2017, the crypto sector has funnelled vast amounts of money into political campaigns. Nearly 60% of this total spending, or $78.94 million out of $131.91 million, took place in just the past two years, 2022 and 2023.

In 2023, Apollo Global Management emerged as the top spender in crypto lobbying, contributing $7.56 million. Managed Funds Association followed with $4.11 million, while Coinbase spent $2.86 million. Coinbase’s lobbying expenditure has seen a dramatic 3475% increase since 2017, when it spent just $80,000. Over 74% of Coinbase’s total lobbying spend occurred in 2022 and 2023.
Binance.us also experienced a significant rise in lobbying, with an increase of 656.25% from $160,000 in 2021 to $1.215 million in 2023. Ripple saw a similarly impressive surge, with lobbying expenses jumping by 1780% from $50,000 in 2017 to $940,000 in 2023.
This rapid growth underscores the crypto industry's increasing efforts to shape regulation and policy, particularly as it seeks to influence the 2024 elections. Despite the industry's push, crypto remains a niche interest, with only 7% of Americans using or holding digital currency in 2023.
Five Ways the 2024 Election Will Affect the Crypto Market
Here are the five most probable ways that the 2024 election will affect the cryptocurrency market: 
Influence of Memes and Popular Culture
The 2024 election has been marked by a surge in meme culture, particularly around former President Donald Trump. 
With influential figures like Elon Musk supporting Trump, there has been an increase in the popularity of meme coins. This trend is reminiscent of past spikes in interest, where major events led to a broader awareness and investment in various cryptocurrencies. 
The chaotic nature of the current election, with its unexpected twists and turns, provides ample fodder for memes, further driving interest in meme coins. This phenomenon not only entertains but also serves as a gateway for new investors exploring the crypto space.
Candidates' Stances on Cryptocurrency
The candidates' positions on cryptocurrency regulation are significant. Trump, who was previously critical of digital assets, has become a vocal supporter, advocating for minimal regulation and even proposing a National Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. 
This stance is likely to appeal to pro-crypto voters and investors. In contrast, Vice President Kamala Harris's position is less clear. While the Biden administration has been perceived as tough on crypto, recent signals from Harris's camp suggest a potential shift towards a more business-friendly approach. 
The public perception of Harris as anti-crypto could lead to market volatility, depending on her campaign's messaging and actions.
Future Regulation of Cryptocurrency
The election could have lasting implications for the regulation of cryptocurrencies in the U.S. Currently, the Republican Party, including Trump, tends to favour less regulation, promoting a more laissez-faire approach. 
This contrasts with the Democratic Party's push for stronger oversight, particularly in the wake of incidents like the FTX collapse. However, the crypto industry has strategically donated to both parties, ensuring some level of support regardless of the election outcome. 
The lack of clear polarization among voters on this issue suggests that major regulatory changes may not be a central campaign focus, though behind-the-scenes lobbying remains influential.
Limited Impact on Voter Decisions
Despite the increasing prominence of cryptocurrency in public discourse, it remains a relatively minor issue for most voters. 
Key concerns such as inflation, healthcare, and immigration dominate the political landscape. As a result, politicians may not feel pressured to take definitive stances on crypto regulation. 
This allows for flexibility in policy positions, with the potential for crypto-friendly measures to gain traction without significant electoral repercussions. The industry's influence is likely to be felt more through lobbying efforts than direct voter engagement.
Rising Bitcoin Prices
The price of Bitcoin is notably higher than in previous election cycles, reflecting both the maturation of the cryptocurrency market and increased public interest. 
This trend underscores the growing importance of crypto assets in the financial portfolios of many voters. As Bitcoin remains the most well-known and widely held cryptocurrency, its performance can significantly impact public perception and confidence in the crypto market. 
Moreover, U.S. policies on cryptocurrency can have global repercussions, influencing international markets and regulatory approaches.
Conclusion
In the 2024 election, cryptocurrency has become a key issue. Both major parties are paying close attention to the large sums of money flowing into campaigns from crypto supporters. 
Donald Trump has embraced the crypto community with promises of a more favorable regulatory environment. Meanwhile, Kamala Harris and the Democrats are gradually addressing the topic but lag behind in enthusiasm. Crypto backers are heavily funding campaigns, hoping to sway the regulatory landscape in their favor. 
This influx of money is influencing not only the presidential race but also down-ballot contests, making it a critical issue in many campaigns. With so much at stake, the debate over crypto regulation will likely intensify as the election nears.

#TrumpCrypto #TrumpInCrypto #TrumpCryptoSupport #kamalaHarris #kamala
$BTC $XRP $BNB

The financial trajectory of U.S. Presidents and Vice Presidents often shifts significantly after their time in office, influenced by a combination of public service, book deals, speaking engagements, and other post-office endeavors.
Before entering office, many Presidents and Vice Presidents had already accumulated substantial wealth, often through careers in law, business, or previous political positions. For instance, George W. Bush, with his business ventures and family wealth, and Donald Trump, with his real estate empire, were wealthy before their presidencies. Similarly, Joe Biden had amassed a comfortable net worth through his long Senate career.
However, the post-office period is where the most notable changes often occur. Barack Obama, for example, saw a significant increase in his wealth after leaving office, largely due to lucrative book deals and speaking engagements. Bill Clinton’s net worth also soared post-presidency, thanks to similar avenues, along with the establishment of the Clinton Foundation. These opportunities allowed them to capitalize on their global recognition and influence.
On the other hand, some Presidents have seen little change or even a decline in their wealth after office. Jimmy Carter, for example, focused more on humanitarian work through the Carter Center rather than on personal financial gain, resulting in a modest increase in his wealth. Gerald Ford also experienced only a moderate increase, as his post-presidency income was more restrained.
In contrast, Vice Presidents, while generally less wealthy than Presidents, have also seen post-office financial boosts. Joe Biden, after his Vice Presidency, notably increased his wealth through book deals and speaking tours before becoming President.
Overall, the wealth of U.S. Presidents and Vice Presidents tends to increase significantly after office, reflecting the monetization of their public service careers.#USPresidentialElection #DonaldJTrump #kamala #CryptoNewsCommunity

Crypto and Bitcoin mining stocks in the U.S. rebounded after initial declines during early trading on September 11, following the vice-presidential debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. Opinion polls, including one from YouGov, indicated that voters rated Harris as the winner of the debate, which seemed to have had an indirect impact on the markets.
Publicly traded companies tied to the crypto industry saw early drops but quickly recovered. Notably, shares in crypto exchange Coinbase (COIN) dipped to $150 but bounced back by 5.3%, settling at around $157 in after-hours trading, according to Google Finance.
Similarly, Bitcoin-holding MicroStrategy (MSTR) fell to $122 before stabilizing, ending the day just 0.26% down at $129.30 and slightly adjusting to $128.50 in after-hours trading.
Bitcoin mining firms were also affected by the debate. Marathon Digital (MARA) and Riot Platforms (RIOT) experienced early losses, yet managed to minimize declines, closing at -0.94% and -2.07%, respectively. The only standout in the mining sector was Hut 8 (HUT), which rose 1.29% to $10.58 after recovering from an intraday low of $9.76.
Despite early jitters, the broader crypto market, which initially saw a $60 billion dip in capitalization on September 11, also managed to regain ground. Bitcoin prices dropped 3.7%, hitting an intraday low of $55,573 but soon rebounded to $57,900 by early trading on September 12.
Harris’ strong debate showing hasn’t yet affected her polling numbers significantly. FiveThirtyEight’s data from September 11 still shows Harris leading Trump by 2.6 percentage points. While Trump has made clear pro-crypto promises, Harris’ stance on cryptocurrency remains unclear, leaving the crypto industry’s long-term market sentiment in anticipation.
For now, however, the market has shown resilience, bouncing back after the debate and continuing to stabilize.
#BTC #kamala #Trump2024
$BTC