According to Cointelegraph, stablecoin issuer Tether has made its inaugural venture capital investment by contributing $2 million to Arcanum Capital’s Arcanum Emerging Technologies Fund II. This fund is a tokenized investment vehicle focused on decentralized Web3 projects. James McDowall, managing partner at Arcanum Capital, stated that the fund targets blockchain technologies aimed at improving remittances, cross-border payments, privacy, and banking services for the unbanked.
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino emphasized that censorship resistance and the promotion of open communication are central goals for both Tether and the fund. He highlighted the evolving relationship between financial systems and individual freedoms, noting the increasing restrictions on open communication and the vulnerabilities exposed by geopolitical conflicts. This investment marks another step in Tether's ongoing diversification strategy.
Ardoino mentioned that diversification is a key focus for Tether, and the company plans to continue this strategy into 2025. In October, Tether proposed a boron-backed token to the Turkish government, leveraging Turkey's control over 70% of the global boron supply. Additionally, Tether completed its first energy financing deal in October, facilitating a $45 million oil transaction using its USDT stablecoin, which included transporting 670,000 barrels of crude oil from the Middle East.
Looking ahead, Tether introduced the Hadron tokenization platform in 2025, enabling businesses, asset managers, and countries to tokenize real-world assets such as government securities and stocks. On December 20, Ardoino announced Tether’s $775 million investment in the video platform Rumble, which is known for its free-speech stance. Ardoino cited Rumble’s commitment to free speech as a significant factor in Tether's decision to invest.
#Crypto2025Trends
#USDT

Today, #BTC followed the downward trend presented in yesterday's RSI, leaving the 98.9K #USDT range to 95.4 #USDT during the day, where it found its new support level. During the following 14 hours, its RSI recovered, leaving the critical zone below 30 points, and now it is sailing between 43 (its last high point of the day) and 37 points. The EMA lines on the 1h chart confirmed the reversal to a downtrend.
However, if we see an increase in purchasing volume, and the RSI exceeds 50 points, we could see a new upward reversal, which could represent a price increase towards the 99k USDT range, or above the resistance level of 99.4 K USDT.

EU to Tether: Meet MiCA Standards or Risk $USDT Removal—The Implications for Crypto Markets
The European Union has issued a decisive warning: Tether’s $USDT must adhere to the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulatory framework by December 30, 2024, or face being delisted from exchanges across the EU. This mandate could have profound effects on the cryptocurrency market both within Europe and globally.
Why This Decision is Crucial
MiCA introduces a comprehensive regulatory framework designed to enhance transparency, enforce strict auditing standards, and oversee the operation of stablecoins. As the most widely traded stablecoin, $USDT’s compliance—or lack thereof—could have a significant impact on the broader crypto ecosystem. Tether is required to prove its reserves and undergo independent audits to satisfy MiCA’s guidelines. Failure to comply would result in its removal from EU trading platforms, potentially causing disruptions to liquidity and investor confidence.
The Impact of a $USDT Delisting
$USDT plays a pivotal role in global cryptocurrency trading. Its absence from the European market could result in inefficiencies and heightened market volatility. Traders and exchanges would be forced to shift to alternatives like USD Coin ($USDC) or Dai ($DAI), but these stablecoins must also meet MiCA’s rigorous requirements. This transition may create short-term instability as the market adjusts to the new regulatory environment.
A Potential Catalyst for Global Change
The EU’s stance on $USDT compliance could set a global precedent, prompting other nations to adopt stricter rules for stablecoins. While this could foster greater trust in the market, it also poses challenges for issuers operating across multiple regulatory jurisdictions.
As global scrutiny intensifies, Tether and other stablecoin providers face growing pressure to align with evolving regulatory expectations. Whether this leads to a more transparent and resilient market or creates hurdles for innovation remains uncertain, but the December 2024 deadline marks a critical moment for the future of stablecoins.
Key Insight: The EU’s MiCA deadline transcends a simple compliance requirement—this is a turning point for stablecoin regulation on a global scale.
#CryptoRegulation #USDT

Stablecoins have become a cornerstone of decentralized finance (DeFi), providing a reliable bridge between cryptocurrencies and traditional fiat currencies. However, not all stablecoins are created equal. This article compares USDT (Tether), the most widely used stablecoin, with USUAL, a revolutionary new player redefining stablecoins through decentralization and community ownership.
1. Core Concept
USDT: Tether is a centralized, fiat-backed stablecoin pegged 1:1 to USD. It is primarily designed to offer price stability for cryptocurrency traders and investors.
Usual: Usual is a decentralized stablecoin protocol that combines stability with governance rights and profit-sharing, empowering its users to control the protocol's growth and decision-making.
2. Control & Ownership
USDT: Fully controlled by Tether Limited, a centralized company that makes decisions about reserves and policies without user input. Users are dependent on the company’s transparency and governance.
Usual: Operates on a decentralized governance model through $USUAL tokens. Users directly influence decisions, including treasury management, collateral strategies, and reward distribution.
3. Transparency
USDT: Transparency has been a point of concern, as Tether has faced criticism for unclear audits and doubts about reserve backing.
Usual: Fully on-chain transparency ensures that reserves and transactions are auditable by anyone at any time. This fosters trust and accountability.
4. Collateralization and Security
USDT: Reserves include cash, bonds, and commercial paper, exposing it to fractional reserve risks linked to banks. The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) highlighted the dangers of reliance on traditional banks.
Usual: Backed by safe, short-term U.S. Treasury Bills (T-bills), which are bankruptcy-remote and not exposed to fractional reserve banking. This structure ensures a higher level of security and stability.
5. Profit Sharing and Yield Generation
USDT: Profits earned from reserves go entirely to Tether Limited, leaving users with no yield or profit-sharing opportunities.
Usual: Profits generated by the treasury are retained within the protocol to increase the value of $USUAL tokens. Users benefit from both yield and growth exposure by staking tokens or holding them for price appreciation.
6. Governance Rights
USDT: Users have no say in Tether’s decisions. It operates as a traditional centralized entity.
Usual: Holders of $USUAL tokens participate in voting and governance, influencing decisions such as collateral management, yield strategies, and treasury allocation.
7. Utility and Incentives
USDT: Serves primarily as a transaction medium with no additional utilities or incentives.
Usual: Provides multiple utilities:
Staking Rewards: Earn passive income by staking $USUAL tokens.Voting Power: Influence key decisions in the protocol.Growth Exposure: Gain from the increasing value of the treasury.
8. Security and Stability
USDT: Depends on centralized audits and regulatory oversight, which may introduce counterparty risks.
Usual: Utilizes smart contracts and blockchain-based transparency to eliminate counterparty risks and ensure stability.
9. Scalability and Growth Model
USDT: Focused on profit maximization for its centralized entity, limiting incentives for users.
Usual: Aligns user incentives with protocol growth, creating sustainable expansion by reinvesting profits into the treasury and rewarding token holders.
10. Key Comparison Table

Final Thoughts
Both USDT and Usual offer stablecoin solutions, but they cater to different needs:
USDT is suitable for users seeking simplicity and liquidity without requiring governance rights.Usual appeals to those who want control, transparency, and profit-sharing through a decentralized ownership model.
With Usual, users not only hold a stablecoin but also become owners and decision-makers, aligning incentives for growth and creating a fairer financial ecosystem. It represents a game-changer in stablecoins, blending stability, security, and ownership—key pillars for the next generation of DeFi.
#DOYR #UsualToken #USDT #BinanceAlphaAlert #Crypto2025Trends