The
#crypto business has endured numerous obstacles and losses in recent years, but 2023 could be even more chaotic. Michael Barr, the Vice Chairman of the Federal Reserve, is on a warpath against crypto and stablecoins.
Based on research, Michael Barr, the Fed's Vice Chair for Supervision, could play an important role in upcoming crypto and stablecoin legislation. Barr was welcomed at the Peterson Institute for International Economics on March 9. Barr highlighted keeping
#cryptocurrency out of the banking sector during his speech.
To get a sense of what Michael Barr has in mind, he declared that the Federal Reserve would form a team to deal with "unregulated stablecoins" shortly before USDC lost its peg.
Who Exactly Is Michael Barr?
Michael Barr is a lawyer who has spent the majority of his career bouncing back and forth between academia and the federal government. He was a key author of the Dodd-Frank Act, which was enacted in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis. The Dodd-Frank Act made bank "bail-ins" permissible in the United States and prepared the way for similar measures around the world.
Dodd-Frank allows a bank customer's money to be used to bail out the bank in the event of a financial disaster.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was also established by the Dodd-Frank Act (CFPB). Elizabeth Warren, allegedly the most anti-crypto politician in the United States, proposed it. The CFPB was suspected of being behind the original 'Choke Point' operation.
This regulation effectively isolated certain industries from the banking industry. Curiously, the CFPB was sponsored by an anti-crypto politician who was supposedly behind a previous effort to unbank specific sectors. This implies that it could be behind the present attempt to debank the cryptocurrency industry.
Regrettably, there is no way to determine whether the CFPB acts independently. The CFPB is not controlled by Fed officials or US lawmakers, while being funded by the Fed and accounting for up to 12% of the Fed's total yearly budget. Barr may have some insight into this secretive agency because he co-authored the legislation that established it.
Unexpectedly, Michael Barr added something for himself in the "Dodd-Frank Act II" — a new job at the Federal Reserve. Can you figure out what position it is? It is, indeed, the vice chair for supervision. Michael Barr had the same job last year.
Anti-Crypto Speech On The Rise
Barr delivered his address the day before the banking crisis erupted. It's been speculated that he and his anti-crypto allies will use the scenario to explain the crypto industry's demise. Another critical element appears to be keeping
#Stablecoins out of the banking system.
This is due to the fact that crypto, particularly stablecoins, are direct competitors to FedNow.
FedNow is the Federal Reserve's planned interbank payments platform. It's akin to taking a step closer to the development of a hypothetical digital dollar central bank digital currency (CBDC).
Therefore, with that context in mind, let's take a closer look at what Barr said about cryptocurrency in his recent address.
Michael Barr began his address by stating that the Fed wishes to learn from the recent volatility in the cryptocurrency markets. He emphasized that while the Federal Reserve does not want to hinder innovation, it does want stringent crypto rules, particularly surrounding stablecoins.
In prior testimony, Fed Chair Jerome Powell stated just this.
American Crypto Users Are Increasing
Barr also stated that he spoke with college students who had lost money in cryptocurrency, while conceding that approximately 20% of American adults have owned or continue to hold cryptocurrency. He went on to say that too many restrictions impede innovation, while too little regulation jeopardizes current institutions.
Barr went on to say that while blockchain technology is useful, cryptocurrencies is not. He even claimed that the benefits of crypto are "inconsistent with reality" and that crypto adoption is "contagious." Barr claimed that the appeal of crypto is that it is free of government control and that it may be used as a hedge against inflation when correlated to other assets.
He correctly pointed out that most cryptocurrencies claim to be decentralized, even if they are not. The fall of FTX was one of several crypto disasters, claiming that crypto is appealing to criminals despite the fact that practically every transaction is publicly available and traceable.
Barr determined that cryptocurrency will eventually represent a danger to the banking sector. As evidence of this threat, he mentioned the failures of Silvergate, Silicon Valley Bank, and Signature Bank.
The Federal Reserve Collaborating With Other Regulators
The Federal Reserve is collaborating with international authorities to ensure that there is no regulatory arbitrage and that crypto has nowhere to go. Furthermore, the regulatory body indicated that any bank with existing or future cryptocurrency clients must notify the Fed, and banks should not store any cryptocurrency on their balance sheets. Banks must understand the "liquidity risks" of stablecoin deposits.
In their warnings, the Fed and its allies are expected to continue to target stablecoins. Because stablecoin adoption could be exponential, Barr argues that all stablecoins must be subject to Fed regulation.
Fears Concerning Stablecoins
After that, Barr was asked how long it would take the Fed to crack down on stablecoins. He didn't say anything directly, but he did say it would be shortly. Some in the cryptocurrency industry believe that by categorizing stablecoins as securities, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will perform the majority of the heavy lifting.
The SEC recently filed a lawsuit against Paxos for issuing the BUSD stablecoin. This puts the entire $137 billion market at jeopardy. Coinbase then delisted BUSD, adding to the confusion. Depending on the SEC's judgment on BUSD, other exchanges may be required to delist stablecoins.
Barr blamed the crypto crackdown on "little banks effectively masking their crypto exposure." Barr also believes that, unlike the EU, the US is unlikely to adopt crypto-specific legislation and will instead adapt current regulations to apply to the crypto industry.
He then released a bombshell, stating that the Fed, SEC, and other authorities will continue to enforce crypto rules until Congress adequately resolves them. This is frightening because Congress may not establish a regulatory framework until after the next presidential election.
Cracks In The Crypto Industry
In response to an interviewer's follow-up question, Barr stated that the Fed has been collaborating closely with the Financial Stability Board (FSB) on global crypto legislation. This June, the FSB is anticipated to release its global crypto regulatory proposals.
Finally, the use case for stablecoins is confined to cryptocurrency. Barr implied that the Fed intends to keep it that way. The continual development of
#CBDCs allows the United States government to track every transaction and control saving and spending. Nevertheless, if stablecoins become a payment option, the government would not be legally permitted to do so. Stablecoins have an edge over CBDCs in this regard.
These storylines suggest that regulatory meddling will very certainly continue.
Several cryptocurrency companies and initiatives are increasingly relocating to other countries. According to Michael Barr's statements, the culmination of this crypto crackdown will most likely be the de-banking of one or more stablecoin issuers.
Is A Stablecoin Crackdown On The Way?
Since that the Federal Reserve and other regulators seek to blame the crypto industry for the banking crisis, de-banking stablecoin issuers could be one of their answers.
They could go for the reserves that support stablecoins if they chose to.
#Tether (USDT) holds over half of its reserves in the US. The anti-crypto cabal could concoct a rationale to seize or freeze Tether's reserves until the outcome of some arbitrary probe. Circle's anti-crypto sympathizers may also point to USDC's recent de-pegging and the subsequent run on redemptions. They could argue that if the run had been longer, it would have further destabilized the banking sector.
Zooming out, it's clear that the Federal Reserve and its regulatory counterparts are determined to crack down on stablecoins. These efforts may intensify when stablecoins are viewed as direct competitors.