Feed-Creator-6173a2f23
4 Sledite
6 Sledilci
15 Všečkano
0 Deljeno
si este es una marioneta blackrock
JUST IN - Chancellor Merz (CDU) tells U.S. to "stay out of German politics" ahead of first Trump call on Thursday — Telegraph.
“The American government must accept how we deal with our democratic institutions, and how we deal with political parties which are classified, for instance, as right-wing extremist organisations,” he told Die Welt.
“The American government must accept how we deal with our democratic institutions, and how we deal with political parties which are classified, for instance, as right-wing extremist organisations,” he told Die Welt.
yo no puedo declararlo, tendré que comprar velas que no me fío de los puteros que me gobiernan
Avere criptovalute non è illegale. Non dichiararle quando necessario, sì può esserlo..
Fate attenzione…
📌 1. Devo dichiarare solo per aver comprato criptovalute?No. Se semplicemente acquisti e mantieni criptovalute, non devi dichiararle nella Dichiarazione dei Redditi (IRPEF) finché non le vendi o scambi per un'altra cripto, euro o un altro bene.Ma devi tenere in considerazione:Se usi Binance o un altro exchange estero e il tuo portafoglio supera i 50.000 €, potresti essere obbligato a presentare il Modello 721 (obbligatorio dal 2024).
💰 2. Quando devo dichiarare nella dichiarazione dei redditi?Devi dichiarare quando ottieni benefici, per esempio:Vendi criptovalute in euro.Scambi una cripto per un'altra (conta anche come un'operazione con guadagno o perdita).Usi criptovalute per pagare beni o servizi.Queste operazioni generano una plusvalenza o minusvalenza patrimoniale che devi riflettere nella tua dichiarazione dei redditi.📊 I guadagni sono tassati secondo il seguente scaglione di IRPEF (2024):Fino a 6.000 € → 19%Da 6.000 a 50.000 € → 21%Da 50.000 a 200.000 € → 23%Oltre 200.000 € → 27%-28%
📤 3. Quali modelli può chiedermi l'Agenzia delle Entrate?Modello 721 (nuovo): Per dichiarare i saldi negli exchange esteri se il valore supera i 50.000 € al 31 dicembre.Sanzioni per non presentarlo: da 5.000 € per dato non dichiarato.Modello 100: La tua dichiarazione dei redditi, dove devono essere incluse le guadagni o perdite delle tue operazioni con le cripto.(Prossimamente) Modello 104: Includerà dati sulle operazioni di criptoattivi all'interno della Spagna. Sarà collegato a quanto riportato dagli exchange nazionali.
🔍 4. Come fa l'Agenzia delle Entrate a sapere cosa faccio con le mie cripto?Molte piattaforme (come Binance, Coinbase o Kraken) stanno iniziando a collaborare con l'Agenzia delle Entrate e altre agenzie fiscali.Inoltre, i movimenti di denaro tra la tua banca e un exchange lasciano traccia.L'Agenzia delle Entrate incrocia dati con altre dichiarazioni e può aprire ispezioni se trova incongruenze.
✅ 5. Consigli di base se operi con criptovaluteTieni traccia di tutte le tue operazioni (prezzo di acquisto, vendita, date, commissioni).Usa strumenti come Koinly, CoinTracking o Accointing per aiutarti a calcolare le tue tasse.Se operi frequentemente o hai guadagni significativi, consulta un consulente fiscale specializzato in cripto.Anche se non dichiari ancora, preparati fin da ora: l'ambiente normativo sta avanzando e la fiscalità sulle criptovalute sarà sempre più rigorosa.
Conoscere i tuoi obblighi e agire con trasparenza è il modo migliore per proteggerti e costruire un patrimonio solido a lungo termine.
📌 1. Devo dichiarare solo per aver comprato criptovalute?No. Se semplicemente acquisti e mantieni criptovalute, non devi dichiararle nella Dichiarazione dei Redditi (IRPEF) finché non le vendi o scambi per un'altra cripto, euro o un altro bene.Ma devi tenere in considerazione:Se usi Binance o un altro exchange estero e il tuo portafoglio supera i 50.000 €, potresti essere obbligato a presentare il Modello 721 (obbligatorio dal 2024).
💰 2. Quando devo dichiarare nella dichiarazione dei redditi?Devi dichiarare quando ottieni benefici, per esempio:Vendi criptovalute in euro.Scambi una cripto per un'altra (conta anche come un'operazione con guadagno o perdita).Usi criptovalute per pagare beni o servizi.Queste operazioni generano una plusvalenza o minusvalenza patrimoniale che devi riflettere nella tua dichiarazione dei redditi.📊 I guadagni sono tassati secondo il seguente scaglione di IRPEF (2024):Fino a 6.000 € → 19%Da 6.000 a 50.000 € → 21%Da 50.000 a 200.000 € → 23%Oltre 200.000 € → 27%-28%
📤 3. Quali modelli può chiedermi l'Agenzia delle Entrate?Modello 721 (nuovo): Per dichiarare i saldi negli exchange esteri se il valore supera i 50.000 € al 31 dicembre.Sanzioni per non presentarlo: da 5.000 € per dato non dichiarato.Modello 100: La tua dichiarazione dei redditi, dove devono essere incluse le guadagni o perdite delle tue operazioni con le cripto.(Prossimamente) Modello 104: Includerà dati sulle operazioni di criptoattivi all'interno della Spagna. Sarà collegato a quanto riportato dagli exchange nazionali.
🔍 4. Come fa l'Agenzia delle Entrate a sapere cosa faccio con le mie cripto?Molte piattaforme (come Binance, Coinbase o Kraken) stanno iniziando a collaborare con l'Agenzia delle Entrate e altre agenzie fiscali.Inoltre, i movimenti di denaro tra la tua banca e un exchange lasciano traccia.L'Agenzia delle Entrate incrocia dati con altre dichiarazioni e può aprire ispezioni se trova incongruenze.
✅ 5. Consigli di base se operi con criptovaluteTieni traccia di tutte le tue operazioni (prezzo di acquisto, vendita, date, commissioni).Usa strumenti come Koinly, CoinTracking o Accointing per aiutarti a calcolare le tue tasse.Se operi frequentemente o hai guadagni significativi, consulta un consulente fiscale specializzato in cripto.Anche se non dichiari ancora, preparati fin da ora: l'ambiente normativo sta avanzando e la fiscalità sulle criptovalute sarà sempre più rigorosa.
Conoscere i tuoi obblighi e agire con trasparenza è il modo migliore per proteggerti e costruire un patrimonio solido a lungo termine.
la primera víctima de la guerra es la verdad. No recuerdo quién lo dijo pero es lo primero que pienso con cada noticia que llega
Ukraine a maritime drone has successfully downed a fighter jet off the Russian coastline.
Ukraine’s Group 13 deployed a Magura sea drone, armed with an R-73 missile, to allegedly destroy a $50 million Russian Su-30 near Novorossiisk.
Kyiv shared striking video evidence of the aerial attack, ushering in a new age where ocean-based drones can target aircraft. Analysts warn that Russian air strategies may require a major rethink, as naval drones emerge as a formidable threat to both ships and planes.
A historic milestone.
Ukraine’s Group 13 deployed a Magura sea drone, armed with an R-73 missile, to allegedly destroy a $50 million Russian Su-30 near Novorossiisk.
Kyiv shared striking video evidence of the aerial attack, ushering in a new age where ocean-based drones can target aircraft. Analysts warn that Russian air strategies may require a major rethink, as naval drones emerge as a formidable threat to both ships and planes.
A historic milestone.
Este será un payaso pero en cuanto a ridículo no veo que supere a un abuelo que se cagaba en los pañales y veía cosas en el aire y que la gente fingieseis que gobernaba usa.
Citirana vsebina je bila odstranjena
todo es broma hasta que sucede o se hunde
$BTC seria uma brincadeira dizer que o $XRP vai virar um btc um dia ? deixem sua opnião familia.
depende el calor que haga. si hace mucho calor puedo comerme las 4 esquinas
99% will fail
i m a girl
i m a girl
Tu gobierno decidira por ti respecto a tu dinero y no tendras otra opción que llorar. Porque nunca consiguen recuperar el dinero de politicos corruptos?. Aplaudid siervos
🧊 USDC: A Stablecoin que pode te congelar
Você provavelmente já ouviu que a $USDC é lastreada 1:1 com o dólar e auditada regularmente. Mas o que quase ninguém comenta é: ela também pode ser congelada — literalmente ou até mesmo apagada da sua carteira.
A Circle, empresa emissora da USDC, tem controle total sobre o contrato inteligente que governa a stablecoin. Isso significa que, diferente do Bitcoin, seus $USDC podem ser travados ou apagados por decisão da empresa.
No código da USDC existem funções administrativas como:
function blacklist(address user) – impede um endereço de usar USDC.
function freeze(address user) – bloqueia todas as transações de USDC de um endereço.
Sim, é isso mesmo: a empresa pode bloquear seus fundos se seu endereço for colocado na “lista negra”.
✅E esse não é um poder teórico — já foi usado. Em 2020, a Circle congelou US$ 100.000 de um usuário após uma solicitação de autoridades, por suspeita de envolvimento em atividades fraudulentas.
🔎 Com isso te pergunto: isso é segurança ou censura disfarçada de proteção? Por que deveria existir uma cripto que pode ser bloqueada ou até mesmo apagada da sua conta por uma instituição centralizada?
A verdade é que a Circle está sujeita às regras do sistema financeiro dos EUA. Ela é registrada, auditada e segue leis de combate à lavagem de dinheiro (AML) e financiamento ao terrorismo (CFT).
Isso torna a USDC mais confiável para empresas e instituições, que precisam operar dentro da legalidade — com rastreabilidade e reversibilidade, se necessário. Além disso, deixa clara as regras sobre sua utilização, garantindo previsibilidade para as empresas.
🤔Mas qual a vantagem para você?
Para usuários comuns, se sua stablecoin for roubada e o caso for levado à justiça, ela pode ser recuperada.
Mas também traz riscos: basta um erro de interpretação ou um envolvimento indireto para seus fundos serem bloqueados.
Stablecoin é uma forma de mandar dinheiro para o exterior de maneira mais barata, como o próprio filho do presidente Trump disse recentemente em Dubai, os bancos tradicionais estão ultrapassados e cobram caro por isso.
👇🏻Agora fica a pergunta final: a stablecoin mesmo não sendo descentralizada, será que vale a pena ignorar uma alternativa acessível e funcional de envio de dinheiro como o $USDC ?
A Circle, empresa emissora da USDC, tem controle total sobre o contrato inteligente que governa a stablecoin. Isso significa que, diferente do Bitcoin, seus $USDC podem ser travados ou apagados por decisão da empresa.
No código da USDC existem funções administrativas como:
function blacklist(address user) – impede um endereço de usar USDC.
function freeze(address user) – bloqueia todas as transações de USDC de um endereço.
Sim, é isso mesmo: a empresa pode bloquear seus fundos se seu endereço for colocado na “lista negra”.
✅E esse não é um poder teórico — já foi usado. Em 2020, a Circle congelou US$ 100.000 de um usuário após uma solicitação de autoridades, por suspeita de envolvimento em atividades fraudulentas.
🔎 Com isso te pergunto: isso é segurança ou censura disfarçada de proteção? Por que deveria existir uma cripto que pode ser bloqueada ou até mesmo apagada da sua conta por uma instituição centralizada?
A verdade é que a Circle está sujeita às regras do sistema financeiro dos EUA. Ela é registrada, auditada e segue leis de combate à lavagem de dinheiro (AML) e financiamento ao terrorismo (CFT).
Isso torna a USDC mais confiável para empresas e instituições, que precisam operar dentro da legalidade — com rastreabilidade e reversibilidade, se necessário. Além disso, deixa clara as regras sobre sua utilização, garantindo previsibilidade para as empresas.
🤔Mas qual a vantagem para você?
Para usuários comuns, se sua stablecoin for roubada e o caso for levado à justiça, ela pode ser recuperada.
Mas também traz riscos: basta um erro de interpretação ou um envolvimento indireto para seus fundos serem bloqueados.
Stablecoin é uma forma de mandar dinheiro para o exterior de maneira mais barata, como o próprio filho do presidente Trump disse recentemente em Dubai, os bancos tradicionais estão ultrapassados e cobram caro por isso.
👇🏻Agora fica a pergunta final: a stablecoin mesmo não sendo descentralizada, será que vale a pena ignorar uma alternativa acessível e funcional de envio de dinheiro como o $USDC ?
cuando la gente como buffet dice comerciar suele pensar en robar, pero que no lo parezca.
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Warren Buffett says —
“We should be looking to trade with the rest of the world. Trade should not be used as a weapon.”
Global cooperation > conflict. Wise words from the Oracle of Omaha.
#WarrenBuffett #USNews #economy
“We should be looking to trade with the rest of the world. Trade should not be used as a weapon.”
Global cooperation > conflict. Wise words from the Oracle of Omaha.
#WarrenBuffett #USNews #economy
hay que ser no un mamarracho sino un criminal para decir que es culpa de las eléctricas, se cayó la red eléctrica que es propiedad del estado.
No hubo ataque exterior, el apagón es producto de la codicia de las grandes eléctricas»
El investigador experto en energía Antonio Turiel viene alertando de un apagón masivo hace tiempo por la falta de inversiones y prevención en el sistema energético. Habla de «responsabilidad criminal» por parte de las grandes empresas del sector y sugiere a Sánchez impulsar «la estabilización».El problema no son las energías renovables, quien diga eso no dice la verdad», recalca Antonio Turiel al comenzar la entrevista con NAIZ, este día después del mayor apagón global de la historia del Estado español y Portugal.
El doctor en Física y experto en energía, investigador del CSIC, señala que la clave pasa por la estabilización del sistema en el que ahora convergen grandes cantidades de energía fotovoltaica y eólica. Recuerda que es un problema que también tiene Alemania y que el año pasado casi produce en cinco oportunidades un apagón masivo en el Estado español.
Sin temor a ser un verso suelto en el discurso público, señala a las grandes energéticas, su «codicia» y la falta de inversiones y mecanismos de prevención.
Usted ha dicho en otra entrevista que el apagón es producto de demasiada producción de energía fotovoltaica que reacciona mal a los cambios de demanda. ¿Qué significa?
Es un problema de la tecnología. Los sistemas clásicos de energía se basan en un sistema de vueltas de turbinas pesadas de miles de toneladas, que tienen la ventaja de que en los cambios de demanda se regulan, pues la fuerza en la que gira la turbina puede aumentar o disminuir la cantidad de electricidad. Es un mecanismo automático, pero esto con la fotovoltaica no pasa porque no produce corriente alterna, no produce una onda, sino una fuente continua. Necesitas un aparato que se llama inversor, que genera corriente sintética, pero tiene un problema, que es que responde muy mal a los cambios de demanda. Eso hace que le cueste mucho seguir los cambios de demanda de la red.
En condiciones normales la fotovoltaica es una minoría y los sistemas inerciales se encargan de gestionar las variaciones de demanda, pero en este caso en concreto el 60% de la generación en ese momento era fotovoltaica y el 14% eólica. Y no había sistemas de estabilización porque no se ha invertido en ellos.
El doctor en Física y experto en energía, investigador del CSIC, señala que la clave pasa por la estabilización del sistema en el que ahora convergen grandes cantidades de energía fotovoltaica y eólica. Recuerda que es un problema que también tiene Alemania y que el año pasado casi produce en cinco oportunidades un apagón masivo en el Estado español.
Sin temor a ser un verso suelto en el discurso público, señala a las grandes energéticas, su «codicia» y la falta de inversiones y mecanismos de prevención.
Usted ha dicho en otra entrevista que el apagón es producto de demasiada producción de energía fotovoltaica que reacciona mal a los cambios de demanda. ¿Qué significa?
Es un problema de la tecnología. Los sistemas clásicos de energía se basan en un sistema de vueltas de turbinas pesadas de miles de toneladas, que tienen la ventaja de que en los cambios de demanda se regulan, pues la fuerza en la que gira la turbina puede aumentar o disminuir la cantidad de electricidad. Es un mecanismo automático, pero esto con la fotovoltaica no pasa porque no produce corriente alterna, no produce una onda, sino una fuente continua. Necesitas un aparato que se llama inversor, que genera corriente sintética, pero tiene un problema, que es que responde muy mal a los cambios de demanda. Eso hace que le cueste mucho seguir los cambios de demanda de la red.
En condiciones normales la fotovoltaica es una minoría y los sistemas inerciales se encargan de gestionar las variaciones de demanda, pero en este caso en concreto el 60% de la generación en ese momento era fotovoltaica y el 14% eólica. Y no había sistemas de estabilización porque no se ha invertido en ellos.
alguien puede explicar que tipo de democracias tenemos en las cuales el estado incluso decide sobre tu suerte?. y si es tu propiedad te la expropian a precio de saldo, eso sí.
Tropieza accidentalmente con un yacimiento de oro de 4.000 millones de euros pero la alegría dura poco y nada
Hasta ahora, Francia no tenía minas de oro. A pesar de ser el cuarto país con mayores reservas de oro a nivel mundial, con 2.436 toneladas.
La región de Auvernia - Ródano - Alpes se encuentra cerca de las fronteras italiana y suiza, en el corazón de las montañas francesas. Se caracteriza por un increíble patrimonio natural, formado por paisajes variados que van desde montañas nevadas a lagos y volcanes. Y es ahí donde ha aparecido un yacimiento de oro.
Ha sido un vecino de Auvernia, el que avisó a las autoridades, y lo que pensaba que iba a ser el premio de su vida se ha convertido en un espejismo: el estado ha bloqueado el yacimiento donde se cree (a falta de las perforaciones, informes de pureza, etc.) que hay oro por valor de cuatro mil millones de euros.
Hasta ahora, Francia no tenía minas de oro. A pesar de ser el cuarto país con mayores reservas de oro a nivel mundial, con 2.436 toneladas.
La región de Auvernia - Ródano - Alpes se encuentra cerca de las fronteras italiana y suiza, en el corazón de las montañas francesas. Se caracteriza por un increíble patrimonio natural, formado por paisajes variados que van desde montañas nevadas a lagos y volcanes. Y es ahí donde ha aparecido un yacimiento de oro.
Ha sido un vecino de Auvernia, el que avisó a las autoridades, y lo que pensaba que iba a ser el premio de su vida se ha convertido en un espejismo: el estado ha bloqueado el yacimiento donde se cree (a falta de las perforaciones, informes de pureza, etc.) que hay oro por valor de cuatro mil millones de euros.
no es sólo en México, eso sí, los idiotas aplauden porque les ha dicho que los malos son Trump, Putin, milei o el que decidan en ese momento los medios de comunicación
Citirana vsebina je bila odstranjena
europa es una colonia americana
Who really runs the world right now? 🌍🔥
The U.S. is flexing solo power 🇺🇸, but when Europe and China team up 🇪🇺🤝🇨🇳… the game completely changes.
Together, they’ve got enough influence to launch the U.S. into orbit 🚀🌕—no backup required (though plenty would tag along).
Global power is shifting fast, and it's getting real intense, real quick. Stay sharp.
#VoteToListOnBinance #MarketRebound #GlobalPowerPlay
The U.S. is flexing solo power 🇺🇸, but when Europe and China team up 🇪🇺🤝🇨🇳… the game completely changes.
Together, they’ve got enough influence to launch the U.S. into orbit 🚀🌕—no backup required (though plenty would tag along).
Global power is shifting fast, and it's getting real intense, real quick. Stay sharp.
#VoteToListOnBinance #MarketRebound #GlobalPowerPlay
si la reserva Federal es independiente, como puede marcar la política económica de un país?. hay gente dueña de políticos y de instituciones, viven de robarnos a base de impuestod
The possibility of President Trump dismissing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has gained prominence as the Supreme Court evaluates an appeal concerning the control of independent agencies, which has become an indirect dispute over the autonomy of the U.S. central bank. The case in question centers on Trump's removal of officials from agencies overseeing labor protections, and the decision could influence the president's ability to exert control over independent entities like the Federal Reserve.
Trump has publicly criticized Powell, urging his dismissal and arguing that the Federal Reserve acts too late and makes mistakes. The Trump administration seeks to overturn a 1935 precedent requiring just cause for removing members of governing boards of independent agencies, which could grant the president greater control over these entities. However, the Federal Reserve's independence is protected by law, stipulating that its governors can only be removed for just cause, not political disagreements.
The Supreme Court has shown skepticism regarding just cause protections for executive branch officials but has also acknowledged the uniqueness of the Federal Reserve due to its history and structure. Economists warn that weakening the Fed's independence could unsettle investors and damage the central bank's credibility in its fight against inflation, especially amid concerns that Trump's tariffs could push prices upward. Although the Trump administration insists there is no direct connection between the labor board case and the Federal Reserve, the Supreme Court's decision could set an important precedent regarding the scope of presidential power over independent agencies.
#TrumpVsPowell
Trump has publicly criticized Powell, urging his dismissal and arguing that the Federal Reserve acts too late and makes mistakes. The Trump administration seeks to overturn a 1935 precedent requiring just cause for removing members of governing boards of independent agencies, which could grant the president greater control over these entities. However, the Federal Reserve's independence is protected by law, stipulating that its governors can only be removed for just cause, not political disagreements.
The Supreme Court has shown skepticism regarding just cause protections for executive branch officials but has also acknowledged the uniqueness of the Federal Reserve due to its history and structure. Economists warn that weakening the Fed's independence could unsettle investors and damage the central bank's credibility in its fight against inflation, especially amid concerns that Trump's tariffs could push prices upward. Although the Trump administration insists there is no direct connection between the labor board case and the Federal Reserve, the Supreme Court's decision could set an important precedent regarding the scope of presidential power over independent agencies.
#TrumpVsPowell
los presidentes de la reserva Federal se nombran para 14 años. Solo te pueden destituir es caso de actuación claramente dañina y hay que demostrarlo. Luego está otro tipo de juegos
otmanino
--
🔥 هل يسمح القانون للرئيس دونالد ترامب بإقالة رئيس الفيدرالي جيروم باول؟
🔥 بعد اشارة الكثير من المواقع المختصة ان الرئيس دونالد ترامب يناقش مع فريقه امكانية إقالة جيروم باول ، باعتباره لا يستجيب لطلبات ترامب خاصة فيما يتعلق بتخفيض أسعار الفائدة.
🔥 في هدا السياق أكد باول التزامه برئاسة الاحتياطي الفيدرالي وسط تحديات قانونية، و أنه ليس من اختصاص ترامب اقالته إطلاقا.
🔥 صرح رئيس الاحتياطي الفيدرالي جيروم باول أن القانون الأمريكي لا يسمح للرئيس بإقالته من منصبه. على الرغم من أي طلبات من الرئيس الأمريكي دونالد ترامب، فإن باول ليس لديه نية للاستقالة ويخطط لخدمة كامل فترة ولايته كرئيس للاحتياطي الفيدرالي حتى مايو 2026.
🔥بالإضافة إلى ذلك، ستمتد فترة باول كعضو في مجلس الاحتياطي الفيدرالي حتى يناير 2028. هذا الأسبوع، أعرب باول عن اعتقاده بأن القضية التي يتم مراجعتها حاليًا من قبل المحكمة العليا الأمريكية من غير المحتمل أن تؤثر على الاحتياطي الفيدرالي
🔥 رابط التسجيل في بينانس https://www.binance.com
🔥 بعد اشارة الكثير من المواقع المختصة ان الرئيس دونالد ترامب يناقش مع فريقه امكانية إقالة جيروم باول ، باعتباره لا يستجيب لطلبات ترامب خاصة فيما يتعلق بتخفيض أسعار الفائدة.
🔥 في هدا السياق أكد باول التزامه برئاسة الاحتياطي الفيدرالي وسط تحديات قانونية، و أنه ليس من اختصاص ترامب اقالته إطلاقا.
🔥 صرح رئيس الاحتياطي الفيدرالي جيروم باول أن القانون الأمريكي لا يسمح للرئيس بإقالته من منصبه. على الرغم من أي طلبات من الرئيس الأمريكي دونالد ترامب، فإن باول ليس لديه نية للاستقالة ويخطط لخدمة كامل فترة ولايته كرئيس للاحتياطي الفيدرالي حتى مايو 2026.
🔥بالإضافة إلى ذلك، ستمتد فترة باول كعضو في مجلس الاحتياطي الفيدرالي حتى يناير 2028. هذا الأسبوع، أعرب باول عن اعتقاده بأن القضية التي يتم مراجعتها حاليًا من قبل المحكمة العليا الأمريكية من غير المحتمل أن تؤثر على الاحتياطي الفيدرالي
🔥 رابط التسجيل في بينانس https://www.binance.com
ya de paso podrían explicar cómo los bancos centrales crean dinero de la nada y como afecta al ciudadano
🙍📢📢 Economists Slam U.S. Tariff Policies in Open Declaration
On April 20, 2025, a striking development emerged as nearly 1,000 economists, including two Nobel laureates, voiced their disapproval of U.S. tariff policies under former President Donald Trump. According to PANews, these experts have signed an “anti-tariff declaration” warning that the current trade strategies are economically dangerous.
Labeling Trump’s tariff initiatives as “misguided,” the declaration strongly cautions against the potential of a “self-inflicted recession.” The economists argue that these policies are not only ineffective but also pose significant risks to the U.S. economy by undermining global trade dynamics and sparking retaliatory measures.
The statement underscores the urgent need to reverse what it describes as “incoherent and destructive” trade actions. These experts believe that failure to pivot away from aggressive tariff enforcement could erode market confidence and damage long-term economic stability.
As of 8:00 PM Eastern Time on April 19, 2025, 956 individuals had signed the declaration, demonstrating widespread concern within the economic community.
The movement is gaining traction as public discourse increasingly questions the impact of protectionist trade policies. The message is clear: a collaborative, open-market approach may be the key to sustainable economic growth—rather than isolation through tariffs.
On April 20, 2025, a striking development emerged as nearly 1,000 economists, including two Nobel laureates, voiced their disapproval of U.S. tariff policies under former President Donald Trump. According to PANews, these experts have signed an “anti-tariff declaration” warning that the current trade strategies are economically dangerous.
Labeling Trump’s tariff initiatives as “misguided,” the declaration strongly cautions against the potential of a “self-inflicted recession.” The economists argue that these policies are not only ineffective but also pose significant risks to the U.S. economy by undermining global trade dynamics and sparking retaliatory measures.
The statement underscores the urgent need to reverse what it describes as “incoherent and destructive” trade actions. These experts believe that failure to pivot away from aggressive tariff enforcement could erode market confidence and damage long-term economic stability.
As of 8:00 PM Eastern Time on April 19, 2025, 956 individuals had signed the declaration, demonstrating widespread concern within the economic community.
The movement is gaining traction as public discourse increasingly questions the impact of protectionist trade policies. The message is clear: a collaborative, open-market approach may be the key to sustainable economic growth—rather than isolation through tariffs.
es triste ver a gente que todavía piensa que los de arriba están divididos. Los verdaderos outsiders siempre tienen accidentes antes de llegar
Cryptopolitan
--
White House says Trump is determined to fire Fed’s Powell no matter the cost
Donald Trump wants Jerome Powell gone, and the White House is making it official. On Friday, his top economic adviser confirmed that removing the Federal Reserve chair is now a live option.
“The president and his team will continue to study that matter,” said Kevin Hassett, head of the National Economic Council, during a press briefing, when asked if Powell’s dismissal is on the table. That answer followed Trump’s latest outburst just one day earlier, where he openly threatened to fire Powell.
Trump told reporters:
“I’m not happy with him. I let him know it and if I want him out, he’ll be out of there real fast, believe me.”
The president nominated Jerome Powell to lead the Fed during his first term. Since then, Powell has raised interest rates, resisted Trump’s demands, and warned that the president’s trade policies could damage the economy.
Now, Federal Reserve governors are appointed for 14-year terms. Presidents can’t just fire them. To legally unseat Powell, Trump would have to prove “cause,” something the law reserves for misconduct or major failure.
Donald Trump with Jerome Powell. Official White House Photo by Andrea Hanks (Via Flickr)
Trump tests legal limits as frustration builds with Fed leadership
Trump’s administration is actively looking at how to bypass that rule. He’s already challenging similar restrictions in court. There’s a pending Supreme Court case where Trump is trying to remove limits on his power to fire members of the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board.
If the court sides with him, the ruling could give him legal cover to boot Powell too. Powell himself mentioned the case during a talk at the Economic Club of Chicago, saying:
“That’s a case that people talk about a lot. I don’t think that that decision will apply to the Fed, but I don’t know. It’s a situation that we’re monitoring carefully.”
In 2018, the Fed raised rates many times, which infuriated Trump and made him consider firing Powell even back then. That threat spooked markets, but Trump eventually backed off. Now he’s back at it again, only this time he seems more serious, and he has fewer people trying to stop him.
Meanwhile, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has been warning people inside the White House that firing Powell could wreck financial markets. Two people with direct knowledge of internal conversations told reporters that Bessent has delivered that message repeatedly.
But Trump isn’t listening. His anger is building because Powell isn’t cutting rates, and Trump thinks he should’ve done it a long time ago.
Behind the scenes, the president has been talking to others about replacing Powell before his four-year term ends in May 2026. He met with Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor, at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida to discuss the possibility.
Warsh reportedly advised Trump not to interfere with Powell’s tenure and warned him against removing the Fed chair. But the idea didn’t die there. Others close to Trump have brought up firing Powell as recently as early March, according to a report from the Wall Street Journal.
Cryptopolitan Academy: Coming Soon - A New Way to Earn Passive Income with DeFi in 2025. Learn More
“The president and his team will continue to study that matter,” said Kevin Hassett, head of the National Economic Council, during a press briefing, when asked if Powell’s dismissal is on the table. That answer followed Trump’s latest outburst just one day earlier, where he openly threatened to fire Powell.
Trump told reporters:
“I’m not happy with him. I let him know it and if I want him out, he’ll be out of there real fast, believe me.”
The president nominated Jerome Powell to lead the Fed during his first term. Since then, Powell has raised interest rates, resisted Trump’s demands, and warned that the president’s trade policies could damage the economy.
Now, Federal Reserve governors are appointed for 14-year terms. Presidents can’t just fire them. To legally unseat Powell, Trump would have to prove “cause,” something the law reserves for misconduct or major failure.
Donald Trump with Jerome Powell. Official White House Photo by Andrea Hanks (Via Flickr)
Trump tests legal limits as frustration builds with Fed leadership
Trump’s administration is actively looking at how to bypass that rule. He’s already challenging similar restrictions in court. There’s a pending Supreme Court case where Trump is trying to remove limits on his power to fire members of the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board.
If the court sides with him, the ruling could give him legal cover to boot Powell too. Powell himself mentioned the case during a talk at the Economic Club of Chicago, saying:
“That’s a case that people talk about a lot. I don’t think that that decision will apply to the Fed, but I don’t know. It’s a situation that we’re monitoring carefully.”
In 2018, the Fed raised rates many times, which infuriated Trump and made him consider firing Powell even back then. That threat spooked markets, but Trump eventually backed off. Now he’s back at it again, only this time he seems more serious, and he has fewer people trying to stop him.
Meanwhile, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has been warning people inside the White House that firing Powell could wreck financial markets. Two people with direct knowledge of internal conversations told reporters that Bessent has delivered that message repeatedly.
But Trump isn’t listening. His anger is building because Powell isn’t cutting rates, and Trump thinks he should’ve done it a long time ago.
Behind the scenes, the president has been talking to others about replacing Powell before his four-year term ends in May 2026. He met with Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor, at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida to discuss the possibility.
Warsh reportedly advised Trump not to interfere with Powell’s tenure and warned him against removing the Fed chair. But the idea didn’t die there. Others close to Trump have brought up firing Powell as recently as early March, according to a report from the Wall Street Journal.
Cryptopolitan Academy: Coming Soon - A New Way to Earn Passive Income with DeFi in 2025. Learn More
por eso se las llevan a otros países. marruecos, España, etc
Ansh Shivhare
--
📌 Democratic Senators Sheldon Whitehouse and John Fetterman have introduced the “Clean Cloud Act of 2025.”
The bill targets emissions from crypto mining and AI data centers, with fines set for facilities still relying on non-renewable energy after 2035.
The bill targets emissions from crypto mining and AI data centers, with fines set for facilities still relying on non-renewable energy after 2035.
hace unos cuantos años condenaron a varias personas de grandes bancos por manipular en precio del oro. Resulta que ese precio lo acordaban entre 5 a nivel mundial
Market Makers manipulate crypto market...
over 95% of market movements are controlled by them
I spent 2 years understanding manipulation strategies
Here're 6 hidden manipulations bring ~$20B/year to MM🧵👇
over 95% of market movements are controlled by them
I spent 2 years understanding manipulation strategies
Here're 6 hidden manipulations bring ~$20B/year to MM🧵👇
el último que quiso impedir que Israel tuviera la bomba atómica fue Kennedy y el último que negó un contrato de Siemens fue el que se cayó el helicóptero hace poco
⚠️Polític News
Iran has proposed to the United States a nuclear-free Middle East, including a completely denuclearised Israel
Source: RT
#news
Iran has proposed to the United States a nuclear-free Middle East, including a completely denuclearised Israel
Source: RT
#news
el mercado hace muchos años que dejó de ser de análisis. los grandes fondos y sus máquinas de trading automático deciden el rumbo y las noticias se usan para justificarlos
Citirana vsebina je bila odstranjena
Prijavite se, če želite raziskati več vsebin