๐๐ข๐ง๐š๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐ฏ๐ฌ. ๐๐ž๐š๐ง๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐’๐ช๐ฎ๐ข๐ซ๐ซ๐ž๐ฅ: ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐”๐ง๐ฅ๐ข๐ค๐ž๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐Œ๐ž๐ฆ๐ž๐œ๐จ๐ข๐ง ๐๐š๐ญ๐ญ๐ฅ๐ž ๐Ž๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ ๐“๐ซ๐š๐๐ž๐ฆ๐š๐ซ๐ค ๐‘๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ๐ฌ

In a surprising turn of events, Mark Longo, the owner of Peanut the Squirrel, has launched a legal offensive against Binance, claiming the platform used his iconic squirrel's likeness to promote the $PNUT memecoin without authorization. According to Longo, Peanut isn't just a regular woodland creatureโ€”itโ€™s a trademarked figure representing animal welfare and education since 2017. Now, he accuses Binance of turning his beloved squirrel into an unapproved mascot for a booming memecoin.

Longo has issued a cease-and-desist order demanding Binance halt the alleged misuse by December 31, or risk facing legal action with penalties that could amount to $150,000 per infringement. Legal analysts are already calling this a potentially pivotal case, one that could reshape intellectual property rights in the rapidly expanding memecoin sector.

While Binance remains silent on the matter, likely strategizing its next move, $PNUT continues its meteoric rise, boasting a staggering market cap of $2.25 billion. However, this quirky trademark dispute adds a layer of uncertainty, highlighting how unconventional branding in the memecoin world can collide with established IP laws.

The key takeaway? Squirrels may be cute, but they donโ€™t forgetโ€”and neither do trademark lawyers. As this legal drama unfolds, the outcome could set a new precedent for creative rights in crypto markets. Stay tunedโ€”this is one nutty story you wonโ€™t want to miss.

#binancevspeanut

#BinanceAlpha #USUALSpotPrediction #USUALSpotLaunch #BTCNewATHAgain