Michael Saylor’s influence in Bitcoin is significant, but he does not control its fate. Bitcoin is decentralized and based on consensus, meaning no individual or entity can dictate terms. Even with the largest Bitcoin holdings, such as MicroStrategy’s, the real power lies with node operators who enforce consensus rules.

If Saylor were to fork Bitcoin and make unilateral changes, his fork would likely fail, as seen in the past with Roger Ver’s alternative chain. The value of Bitcoin stems from the lack of centralized control, which ensures its resilience and prevents any one party from dominating decision-making.

Source

<p>The post Michael Saylor’s Claim as Bitcoin Overlord Debunked: Bitcoin’s Decentralization Reigns Supreme first appeared on CoinBuzzFeed.</p>