During the COVID epidemic, there was a significant decrease in global economic activity, causing supply chain issues, job losses, and a stagflation crisis. Climate change advocates claimed this had a positive impact on the environment, as emissions dropped by 5.4%. They proposed “climate shutdowns” to intentionally disrupt global economic activity to slow climate change.
Globalists suggested climate shutdowns as a form of collective punishment for not reducing carbon dioxide emissions. Mariana Mazzucato, a World Economic Forum “Agenda Contributor,” suggested measures such as restricting private cars and banning red meat consumption. The IMF also advocated for global climate action, emphasizing the need for strict economic restrictions and emission limits beyond those implemented during the pandemic to achieve a temperature increase of less than 1.5°C.
Instead of open shutdowns, globalist organizations might prefer a carbon tax, similar to interest rate hikes used to control inflation, which could have a devastating impact on Western countries, causing energy crises, food shortages, job losses, and ultimately economic collapse, leading to a significant population decline.
The IMF and other organizations argue that all countries should achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2030, citing the “climate gap” theory, which claims a 1.5°C temperature increase could trigger environmental disasters and further emissions. However, there is no evidence to support this theory, and the link between carbon dioxide emissions and global warming remains uncertain.
The true purpose of carbon taxes and climate regulations may be to redistribute wealth from developed countries to developing nations while centralizing control over national wealth and individual freedoms.
Source
<p>The post Climate Shutdowns: The Link Between COVID Lockdowns, Carbon Taxes, and Globalist Control first appeared on CoinBuzzFeed.</p>