The rise of crypto-based prediction markets like Polymarket—referred to as ‘Poly-poll’ by Trump in a tongue-in-cheek manner—provided a different perspective on the elections, which were previously tied to official networks and polls. Haseeb Qureshi, managing partner at the VC crypto fund Dragonfly, shared his insights on how Polymarket outperformed mainstream media and pollsters, offering a comprehensive and accurate panorama of the events surrounding Trump’s victory.
Read more: Trump Refers to Polymarket as ‘Poly-Poll’: ‘We’re Doing Really Well’
For Qureshi, two elements stand out in Polymarket’s U.S. presidential election performance. First, Polymarket was consistently more accurate about the correct outcome before the election, having a 62% lead for Trump when traditional polls and sources forecasted a 50-50 chance for both candidates.
He believes that prediction markets, led by the expectation of earnings by traders who have a stake in the bet, were able to capture something that others weren’t able to. he stated:
Polymarket presumably believed that the polls were missing this. The pollsters said, no: we’ve updated our models and corrected for it. Polymarket said: I don’t buy it. Polymarket was right.
Second, Polymarket called the election way quicker than traditional sources, quickly identifying trends and calculating that, for example, Pennsylvania would go to Trump way earlier than other sources. He stated:
Prediction markets don’t wait for pageantry or pundits. It doesn’t care if it invalidates the sacred ritual of waiting for the votes to be counted.
For Qureshi, this vindicates the platform, which had been criticized due to its decentralized and unregulated traits. He assessed that markets interpret and react to data instantly, as traders led by profit incorporate new insights to the platform with the incentive of prizes, something mainstream media just cannot do.
Read more: Polymarket Election Buzz: Why Trump’s Lead Is Stirring Skeptics and Memes Alike