š§ The Catizen project is stirring up chatter for all the wrong reasons. Imagine investing time and effort into a game, only to receive just 2 tokens from the airdrop!
Meanwhile, those who spent big on in-game purchases are rolling in rewards. Is this about building a community, or is it a cash grab?
šø Selective rewards make you wonder: Does Catizen value its players, or just the highest bidders?
š Other projects, like $NOT and $DOGS, generously rewarded their communities, fostering loyalty and growth. But Catizen seems to have chosen a different path.
š” Could this be a tactical move to stabilize prices? Some speculate that Cati token could skyrocket to $0.50 or even $2. If so, those 2 tokens might suddenly feel like gold.
But if they fail, itās another case of over-promising and under-delivering, leaving the community disillusioned. š
š Genius or misguided? As the Cati token hits the market, all eyes are on Catizen. The stakes are high, and the community is watching.
Do you think this is marketing brilliance or just a way to favor the big spenders? Share your thoughts! š¬
#BinanceSquareFamily ##CATIonBinance #AirdropBinance #BTCReboundsAfterFOMC #Write&Earn $CATI