After Hamster Kombat, which managed to gather over 350 million users to waste their time day and night, here comes Tomarket with the worst. History keeps repeating itself.

Many users report that the gameplay mechanics of $TOMA are primarily designed to encourage spending, often with disappointing results where users end up losing money. This creates a major source of disappointment among players.
Tokenomics Issues: The increase in the total supply of TOMA tokens without a corresponding increase in user allocation has been a source of discontent. This tokenomics seems unfair and has contributed to participant frustration, with 100 billion announced but 1 trillion in reality.

Airdrop Problems: Token airdrops haven't been distributed fairly or transparently, which has amplified user frustration. Expectations were not met, and some airdrops were perceived as inadequate compared to the initial investment.

Lack of Communication: A lack of clarity in communication was particularly evident during the switch from TON to Aptos. This major change was not well-explained, leaving many users in uncertainty and increasing dissatisfaction. The demand for explanations from some users on social media highlighted this weakness.
Unfortunate Timing of Registration: Registration for the project during a bear market also played a role in the perceived devaluation of tokens received through airdrops, further eroding user confidence.

Perception of TOMA's Greed: Overall, the user opinion is that TOMA is excessively focused on profitability at the expense of user experience. This negative perception has also impacted Bitget, given their collaboration with TOMA.

Opportunity via Launchpool: Despite these criticisms, Bitget's Launchpool offers a glimmer of hope for some investors. BGB token holders can participate in staking to acquire TOMA tokens, which could mitigate some losses. However, rewards have sometimes been disappointing for those who invested larger amounts. Selling tokens in this context might be a strategic mistake, especially if one hopes for a future reevaluation of the tokens.

Thus, the landscape is complex, with a frustrated user community due to various aspects of TOMA, but with some opportunities for recovery or loss mitigation through mechanisms like the Launchpool.

The moment we've all been waiting for has finally arrived... but it’s safe to say it didn’t quite hit the mark. After months of dedication, engagement, and building on the platform, Tomarket’s much-anticipated airdrop has left users feeling... well, underwhelmed.
💸 The Reality Check: Instead of a grand reward, users are getting a token worth only $2–$3. That’s right—after all the effort, the rewards feel more like pocket change than anything substantial. The culprit? A massive one-trillion-token supply, flooding the market and causing the token’s value to crash before it even started.
❌ The "Dust" Dilemma: What should have been a celebration of community engagement has turned into a wave of frustration. Critics are calling it "dust"—tokens so diluted, they’re practically worthless. Airdrops were supposed to reward loyalty, build excitement, and give real value back to the users. But instead, it’s a reminder of why tokenomics matter.
🤔 The Real Question: Where’s the value in rewarding your most dedicated users with tiny crumbs while pushing them to spend more for "stars" and costly upgrades? Airdrops are meant to strengthen communities, not create additional financial burdens.
🔄 The Call for Change: The Tomarket community is speaking up. It's time for a rethink on tokenomics, reward structures, and airdrop strategies. Let’s bring back meaningful rewards that truly reflect the loyalty and support of the community.
📣 Tomarket, we’re waiting for you to do better!
#TomarketAirdrop #CryptoCommunity #CryptoUsersHit18M $BNB

$BTC

$XRP