Scenario 2:User intends to buy $XXX token on xxL2 chain, but has no funds on xxL2. #dappOS

Without dappOS, even a seemingly simple task like this might require considerable planning. For example:

• Fund Allocation: Deciding which chain’s funds would be more convenient to use for this task; some funds might still be locked in other protocols, requiring withdrawal.

• Conversion: If your funds exist primarily in other chains or in non-ETH forms, how do you convert them to ETH? If you lack sufficient gas for the conversion, how do you obtain the gas?

• Cross-Chain Method: Should you use an on-chain cross-chain protocol, or transfer ETH to an exchange and then withdraw it to the xxL2 chain?

With dappOS, if you hold intentETH, you can go to a dappOS-supported DEX on xxL2 to buy tokens. You’ll find that using intentETH to buy tokens feels just like using regular ETH. Moreover, you won’t need to plan various operational steps, allowing you to use and allocate your on-chain assets more flexibly. For example, you no longer need to leave funds on each L1 or L2 just in case for gas; simply holding Intent Assets will satisfy your cross-chain interaction needs.

In summary, when users hold intentETH, using it in non-yield scenarios feels identical to using native ETH, with the added benefit of earning passive income.