Binance Square
LIVE
Lunc_Turkish_Validator
@NB_CRYPT0
TG; lunc_turkish_validator
Вы подписаны
Подписчики
Понравилось
Поделились
Все публикации
LIVE
--
LTV is a KYC’ed validator on Terra Classic. We come from the community are here for the community. We believe that TERRA is One or the best blockchain in crypto world $BTC $LUNC $USTC
LTV is a KYC’ed validator on Terra Classic. We come from the community are here for the community. We believe that TERRA is One or the best blockchain in crypto world

$BTC $LUNC $USTC
LIVE
--
Рост
$LUNC $USTC $LUNA Luna Classic Turkish Validator
$LUNC $USTC $LUNA

Luna Classic Turkish Validator
SEC VS TERRAFORM #753 Documents from the Bankruptcy Noticing Center (BNC) During the course of a bankruptcy case or proceeding, bankruptcy court notices are mailed by the Bankruptcy Noticing Center (BNC) on behalf of the Court.  The BNC, which is operated by a private contractor, provides notice production and mailing services for the court, but THE BNC IS NOT THE COURT.  #LTV #LunaClassicTurkishValidator $LUNC $USTC $LUNA
SEC VS TERRAFORM #753

Documents from the Bankruptcy Noticing Center (BNC)

During the course of a bankruptcy case or proceeding, bankruptcy court notices are mailed by the Bankruptcy Noticing Center (BNC) on behalf of the Court.  The BNC, which is operated by a private contractor, provides notice production and mailing services for the court, but THE BNC IS NOT THE COURT. 

#LTV #LunaClassicTurkishValidator $LUNC $USTC $LUNA
LTV is a KYC’ed validator on Terra Classic. We come from the community are here for the community. We believe that TERRA is One or the best blockchain in crypto world.$LUNC $USTC
LTV is a KYC’ed validator on Terra Classic. We come from the community are here for the community. We believe that TERRA is One or the best blockchain in crypto world.$LUNC
$USTC
1.000.000 bounty program $LUNC https://commonwealth.im/terra-luna-classic-lunc/discussion/24481-repeg-system-for-terra-luna-classic-lunc-1000000-bounty
1.000.000 bounty program $LUNC https://commonwealth.im/terra-luna-classic-lunc/discussion/24481-repeg-system-for-terra-luna-classic-lunc-1000000-bounty
Discussion for a Flawless Repeg System for Terra Luna Classic (LUNC) - $250,000 Bounty The Luna Classic community, in its pursuit to restore the stability and value of $USTC, hereby announces a bounty of $250,000 for the development of a flawless system to repeg USTC to its intended $1 value. This proposal outlines the requirements, process, and expectations for this initiative. The primary goal is to design, develop, and implement a system that ensures USTC maintains its peg to the USD without the risks that led to the previous depegging event. Requirements for the System: 1. **Stability:** The system must ensure that USTC remains pegged at $1, regardless of market conditions, through mechanisms that automatically adjust supply or demand without human intervention. 2. **Security:** Implementations must be secure against exploits, including but not limited to flash loans, arbitrage, and other known DeFi vulnerabilities. 3. **Transparency:** All algorithms and mechanisms must be open-source, allowing for community review and audit. 4. **Decentralization:** The system should not rely on a single point of failure or centralized entities for its operation. 5. **Economic Incentives:** Design incentives that encourage holders to maintain the peg, possibly through staking, yield farming, or other innovative financial instruments. 6. **Scalability:** The solution should be scalable to handle high transaction volumes without compromising on speed or cost. 7. **Interoperability:** The system should ideally integrate with existing DeFi protocols for liquidity and utility enhancement. Discussion Submission: -Proposals should include: - A detailed whitepaper explaining the mechanics of the repeg system. - Technical documentation including code snippets or full code if available. - Security audits or plans for audits. - Economic models showing how the system maintains the peg. - A timeline for development, testing, and deployment. **Evaluation Criteria:** - **Feasibility:** How practical is the solution in terms of implementation and maintenance? $LUNC
Discussion for a Flawless Repeg System for Terra Luna Classic (LUNC) - $250,000 Bounty

The Luna Classic community, in its pursuit to restore the stability and value of $USTC, hereby announces a bounty of $250,000 for the development of a flawless system to repeg USTC to its intended $1 value. This proposal outlines the requirements, process, and expectations for this initiative.

The primary goal is to design, develop, and implement a system that ensures USTC maintains its peg to the USD without the risks that led to the previous depegging event.

Requirements for the System:

1. **Stability:** The system must ensure that USTC remains pegged at $1, regardless of market conditions, through mechanisms that automatically adjust supply or demand without human intervention.

2. **Security:** Implementations must be secure against exploits, including but not limited to flash loans, arbitrage, and other known DeFi vulnerabilities.

3. **Transparency:** All algorithms and mechanisms must be open-source, allowing for community review and audit.

4. **Decentralization:** The system should not rely on a single point of failure or centralized entities for its operation.

5. **Economic Incentives:** Design incentives that encourage holders to maintain the peg, possibly through staking, yield farming, or other innovative financial instruments.

6. **Scalability:** The solution should be scalable to handle high transaction volumes without compromising on speed or cost.

7. **Interoperability:** The system should ideally integrate with existing DeFi protocols for liquidity and utility enhancement.

Discussion Submission:

-Proposals should include:

- A detailed whitepaper explaining the mechanics of the repeg system.
- Technical documentation including code snippets or full code if available.
- Security audits or plans for audits.
- Economic models showing how the system maintains the peg.
- A timeline for development, testing, and deployment.

**Evaluation Criteria:**

- **Feasibility:** How practical is the solution in terms of implementation and maintenance?
$LUNC
🚀Terraform Labs and Do Kwon agree to temporarily resolve SEC fraud case $LUNA $LUNC
🚀Terraform Labs and Do Kwon agree to temporarily resolve SEC fraud case

$LUNA $LUNC
Terra Classic hakkında bilmeniz gereken bazı önemli noktalar şunlar: Amaç: Terra Classic başlangıçta, stablecoin'leri (fiyatları sabit bir varlığa, genellikle ABD dolarına, bağlı kripto paralar) oluşturmak için bir platform olarak tasarlandı. Bu stablecoin'ler, kripto para birimlerinin fiyat oynaklığını azaltarak geleneksel para birimlerine benzer bir şekilde kullanılmalarını sağlamayı amaçlıyordu. Çöküş: Mayıs 2022'de, TerraUSD (USTC) adlı algoritmik stablecoin'in ABD dolarına olan sabitliğini kaybetmesi nedeniyle Terra ekosistemi büyük bir çöküş yaşadı. Bu olay, kripto para piyasasında önemli kayıplara yol açtı. Güncel Durum: Çöküşten sonra, Terra Classic zincirindeki yatırımcılar, yeni Terra zincirine (LUNA) airdrop yoluyla token aldılar. Terra Classic halen bazı uygulamalara ve projelere ev sahipliği yapıyor olsa da, eski popülerliğinden çok uzakta. Terra Classic blok zincirinin bazı özellikleri şunlardır: Akıllı sözleşmeler: cw20 gibi standartlara sahip akıllı sözleşmeleri destekler. Bu, geliştiricilerin blok zincir üzerinde karmaşık uygulamalar oluşturmasına olanak tanır. Proof-of-Stake (PoS): Blok doğrulama işlemini güvence altına almak için Proof-of-Stake (PoS) konsensüs mekanizmasını kullanır. Bu mekanizmada, doğrulayıcılar tokenlerini stake ederler ve ağa katkıları karşılığında ödüller kazanırlar. Unutmayın: Kripto para birimleri ve blockchain teknolojisi henüz gelişmekte olan alanlardır ve yüksek risk içerir. Yatırım yapmadan önce mutlaka kendi araştırmanızı yapın.$LUNC
Terra Classic hakkında bilmeniz gereken bazı önemli noktalar şunlar:

Amaç: Terra Classic başlangıçta, stablecoin'leri (fiyatları sabit bir varlığa, genellikle ABD dolarına, bağlı kripto paralar) oluşturmak için bir platform olarak tasarlandı. Bu stablecoin'ler, kripto para birimlerinin fiyat oynaklığını azaltarak geleneksel para birimlerine benzer bir şekilde kullanılmalarını sağlamayı amaçlıyordu.
Çöküş: Mayıs 2022'de, TerraUSD (USTC) adlı algoritmik stablecoin'in ABD dolarına olan sabitliğini kaybetmesi nedeniyle Terra ekosistemi büyük bir çöküş yaşadı. Bu olay, kripto para piyasasında önemli kayıplara yol açtı.
Güncel Durum: Çöküşten sonra, Terra Classic zincirindeki yatırımcılar, yeni Terra zincirine (LUNA) airdrop yoluyla token aldılar. Terra Classic halen bazı uygulamalara ve projelere ev sahipliği yapıyor olsa da, eski popülerliğinden çok uzakta.
Terra Classic blok zincirinin bazı özellikleri şunlardır:

Akıllı sözleşmeler: cw20 gibi standartlara sahip akıllı sözleşmeleri destekler. Bu, geliştiricilerin blok zincir üzerinde karmaşık uygulamalar oluşturmasına olanak tanır.
Proof-of-Stake (PoS): Blok doğrulama işlemini güvence altına almak için Proof-of-Stake (PoS) konsensüs mekanizmasını kullanır. Bu mekanizmada, doğrulayıcılar tokenlerini stake ederler ve ağa katkıları karşılığında ödüller kazanırlar.
Unutmayın: Kripto para birimleri ve blockchain teknolojisi henüz gelişmekte olan alanlardır ve yüksek risk içerir. Yatırım yapmadan önce mutlaka kendi araştırmanızı yapın.$LUNC
Remove $USTC for XXXX COIN Addressing USTC's Peg Issue: XXXX wouldn't directly aim to repeg USTC. Instead, it would offer USTC holders a way to: * Exit USTC and potentially earn rewards in a stablecoin with a reliable peg. * Participate in the Terra Classic blockchain ecosystem through XXXX's governance and fee discounts. **-Make a new coin named (XXXX)** Mechanism: • Minting XXXX: Users would mint XXXX by burning USTC at a predetermined rate (e.g., 1 USTC per 1 XXXX). This permanently removes USTC from circulation. • Utility: early XXXX coin holders would get a good % of $Lunc who have staked them, to make it attractive for USTC holders. ◦ Staking Rewards: Users can stake XXXX to earn $LUNC rewards Against that a reliable peg XXXX coin. Why rewarding people who own USTC with LUNC? ◦ Lunc because we can have enjoy Lunc by minting. I really dont like minting lunc but, At first place its needs minting, people dont have to be worried about minting lunc for long term because with **PEGGING** XXXX coin back to Lunc there will be massive burns again). ◦ Governance Rights: XXXX coin holders can vote on proposals to improve the protocol, including adjusting burn rates or adding new features. ◦ Discount Fees: XXXX coin holders can enjoy, fee discounts , hodler gains, on future Terra Classic blockchain transactions. Attracting Users: • Stablecoin Rewards: The allure of earning rewards in a stablecoin with a reliable peg can incentivize users to switch from USTC. • Staking Flexibility: Consider offering flexible and fixed staking terms to cater to different user preferences. • Community Building: Foster a community around XXXX that emphasizes its role in reviving the Terra Classic ecosystem and creating a path forward for USTC holders. Overall, the USTC Repurpose XXXX coin concept presents an attractive alternative for USTC holders by offering them a way to potentially recoup
Remove $USTC for XXXX COIN

Addressing USTC's Peg Issue:
XXXX wouldn't directly aim to repeg USTC. Instead, it would offer USTC holders a way to:
* Exit USTC and potentially earn rewards in a stablecoin with a reliable peg.

* Participate in the Terra Classic blockchain ecosystem through XXXX's governance and fee discounts.

**-Make a new coin named (XXXX)**

Mechanism:
• Minting XXXX: Users would mint XXXX by burning USTC at a predetermined rate (e.g., 1 USTC per 1 XXXX). This permanently removes USTC from circulation.

• Utility: early XXXX coin holders would get a good % of $Lunc who have staked them, to make it attractive for USTC holders.

◦ Staking Rewards: Users can stake XXXX to earn $LUNC rewards Against that a reliable peg XXXX coin.

Why rewarding people who own USTC with LUNC?

◦ Lunc because we can have enjoy Lunc by minting. I really dont like minting lunc but, At first place its needs minting, people dont have to be worried about minting lunc for long term because with **PEGGING** XXXX coin back to Lunc there will be massive burns again).

◦ Governance Rights: XXXX coin holders can vote on proposals to improve the protocol, including adjusting burn rates or adding new features.

◦ Discount Fees: XXXX coin holders can enjoy, fee discounts , hodler gains, on future Terra Classic blockchain transactions.

Attracting Users:

• Stablecoin Rewards: The allure of earning rewards in a stablecoin with a reliable peg can incentivize users to switch from USTC.

• Staking Flexibility: Consider offering flexible and fixed staking terms to cater to different user preferences.

• Community Building: Foster a community around XXXX that emphasizes its role in reviving the Terra Classic ecosystem and creating a path forward for USTC holders.

Overall, the USTC Repurpose XXXX coin concept presents an attractive alternative for USTC holders by offering them a way to potentially recoup
LIVE
--
Падение
IMF ve Terra arasındaki ilişki: IMF, Terra'nın algoritmik sabitleme mekanizması hakkında endişelerini dile getirdi. IMF, mekanizmanın kırılgan olabileceğini ve UST'nin değerinin keskin bir şekilde düşmesine neden olabileceğini savundu. IMF ayrıca Terra'nın DeFi uygulamalarının finansal istikrara riskler oluşturabileceğini savundu. Terra, IMF'nin endişelerini ele almak için adımlar attı. Terra, UST'yi sabitlemek için daha fazla rezerv ekledi ve DeFi uygulamaları için risk yönetim protokolleri geliştirdi. IMF ve Terra arasındaki ilişki karmaşıktır. IMF, Terra'nın potansiyel risklerini tanırken, aynı zamanda blockchain teknolojisini kullanarak finansal katılımı ve yeniliği teşvik etme potansiyelini de görüyor. IMF'nin Terra'ya ilişkin bazı endişeleri şunlardır: Algoritmik sabitleme mekanizması kırılgan olabilir ve UST'nin değerinin keskin bir şekilde düşmesine neden olabilir. Terra'nın DeFi uygulamaları finansal istikrara riskler oluşturabilir. Terra'nın yönetişimi merkezi olabilir. Terra, IMF'nin endişelerini ele almak için adımlar attı: UST'yi sabitlemek için daha fazla rezerv ekledi. DeFi uygulamaları için risk yönetim protokolleri geliştirdi. Yönetişimi daha merkezi olmayan hale getirmek için çalışıyor. IMF ve Terra arasındaki ilişki gelişmeye devam ediyor. IMF, Terra'nın potansiyel risklerini izlemeyi sürdürürken, Terra da endişeleri ele almak için adımlar atmaya devam ediyor.
IMF ve Terra arasındaki ilişki:

IMF, Terra'nın algoritmik sabitleme mekanizması hakkında endişelerini dile getirdi. IMF, mekanizmanın kırılgan olabileceğini ve UST'nin değerinin keskin bir şekilde düşmesine neden olabileceğini savundu. IMF ayrıca Terra'nın DeFi uygulamalarının finansal istikrara riskler oluşturabileceğini savundu.

Terra, IMF'nin endişelerini ele almak için adımlar attı. Terra, UST'yi sabitlemek için daha fazla rezerv ekledi ve DeFi uygulamaları için risk yönetim protokolleri geliştirdi.

IMF ve Terra arasındaki ilişki karmaşıktır. IMF, Terra'nın potansiyel risklerini tanırken, aynı zamanda blockchain teknolojisini kullanarak finansal katılımı ve yeniliği teşvik etme potansiyelini de görüyor.

IMF'nin Terra'ya ilişkin bazı endişeleri şunlardır:

Algoritmik sabitleme mekanizması kırılgan olabilir ve UST'nin değerinin keskin bir şekilde düşmesine neden olabilir.
Terra'nın DeFi uygulamaları finansal istikrara riskler oluşturabilir.
Terra'nın yönetişimi merkezi olabilir.
Terra, IMF'nin endişelerini ele almak için adımlar attı:

UST'yi sabitlemek için daha fazla rezerv ekledi.
DeFi uygulamaları için risk yönetim protokolleri geliştirdi.
Yönetişimi daha merkezi olmayan hale getirmek için çalışıyor.
IMF ve Terra arasındaki ilişki gelişmeye devam ediyor. IMF, Terra'nın potansiyel risklerini izlemeyi sürdürürken, Terra da endişeleri ele almak için adımlar atmaya devam ediyor.
$BTC I am feeling a bullish weekend, NFA
$BTC

I am feeling a bullish weekend, NFA
🚨 Difference between $LUNA and $LUNC Luna (LUNA) and Luna Classic (LUNC) are two cryptocurrencies with a shared history, but they now operate on separate blockchains and have distinct purposes. Here's a breakdown of their key differences: Blockchain: LUNA: Operates on the new Terra blockchain, launched in May 2022 after the collapse of the original Terra ecosystem. LUNC: Exists on the Terra Classic blockchain, which is the original Terra blockchain that experienced the crash in May 2022. Purpose: LUNA: Serves as the native token of the new Terra blockchain. It plays a role in governance, staking, and gas fees for network transactions. The new Terra ecosystem aims to be a platform for stablecoins and decentralized applications (dApps). LUNC: The original purpose of LUNC (formerly LUNA) was to support the price stability of the TerraUSD (USTC) stablecoin on the Terra Classic blockchain. However, due to the crash, LUNC's role and future use case are uncertain. There are ongoing efforts to revive the Terra Classic ecosystem, but its success remains to be seen. Stability: LUNA: The new Terra blockchain uses a different economic model for its stablecoin, TerraUSD (UST), which combines algorithmic adjustments with a reserve mechanism backed by real-world assets like Bitcoin (BTC) to maintain its peg to the US dollar. This model aims to be more stable than the algorithmic mechanism used by USTC on Terra Classic. LUNC: Highly volatile due to the collapse of the Terra Classic ecosystem and the de-pegging of USTC from the US dollar. Price: LUNA: Generally has a higher market capitalization and trading volume compared to LUNC. LUNC: Significantly lower price point than LUNA due to the crash and uncertain future. Overall: LUNA: Represents the new chapter of the Terra ecosystem, focusing on stablecoins and dApps with a supposedly more robust economic model. LUNC: Carries the baggage of the Terra Classic collapse and has an uncertain future, although revival efforts are ongoing.
🚨 Difference between $LUNA and $LUNC

Luna (LUNA) and Luna Classic (LUNC) are two cryptocurrencies with a shared history, but they now operate on separate blockchains and have distinct purposes. Here's a breakdown of their key differences:

Blockchain:

LUNA: Operates on the new Terra blockchain, launched in May 2022 after the collapse of the original Terra ecosystem.
LUNC: Exists on the Terra Classic blockchain, which is the original Terra blockchain that experienced the crash in May 2022.
Purpose:

LUNA: Serves as the native token of the new Terra blockchain. It plays a role in governance, staking, and gas fees for network transactions. The new Terra ecosystem aims to be a platform for stablecoins and decentralized applications (dApps).
LUNC: The original purpose of LUNC (formerly LUNA) was to support the price stability of the TerraUSD (USTC) stablecoin on the Terra Classic blockchain. However, due to the crash, LUNC's role and future use case are uncertain. There are ongoing efforts to revive the Terra Classic ecosystem, but its success remains to be seen.
Stability:

LUNA: The new Terra blockchain uses a different economic model for its stablecoin, TerraUSD (UST), which combines algorithmic adjustments with a reserve mechanism backed by real-world assets like Bitcoin (BTC) to maintain its peg to the US dollar. This model aims to be more stable than the algorithmic mechanism used by USTC on Terra Classic.
LUNC: Highly volatile due to the collapse of the Terra Classic ecosystem and the de-pegging of USTC from the US dollar.
Price:

LUNA: Generally has a higher market capitalization and trading volume compared to LUNC.
LUNC: Significantly lower price point than LUNA due to the crash and uncertain future.
Overall:

LUNA: Represents the new chapter of the Terra ecosystem, focusing on stablecoins and dApps with a supposedly more robust economic model.
LUNC: Carries the baggage of the Terra Classic collapse and has an uncertain future, although revival efforts are ongoing.
Merge between $LUNA and $LUNC ? No, a direct merger between Luna (LUNA) and Luna Classic (LUNC) is not technically possible. Here's why: Different Blockchains: LUNA operates on the new Terra blockchain, while LUNC exists on the Terra Classic blockchain, which is a separate network altogether. Merging them would be akin to merging two entirely different databases. Technical Challenges: There are significant technical hurdles to overcome to merge two separate blockchains. It would be a complex and potentially risky process. Community Considerations: The communities surrounding LUNA and LUNC have different goals and perspectives. A merger might not be desirable for either community. However, there have been discussions about potential bridges or interactions between the two ecosystems: Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC): Some proposals suggest using IBC technology to enable some form of communication or asset transfer between the new Terra and Terra Classic blockchains. This could involve allowing LUNC holders to swap their tokens for LUNA on the new Terra blockchain, potentially with additional incentives. Wrapped LUNC: Another concept involves creating a "wrapped" version of LUNC that could be used on the new Terra blockchain. However, this wouldn't be a true merger but rather a way to represent LUNC on a different network. Important Points to Remember: Uncertain Future: Any potential interactions between LUNA and LUNC are still under discussion and their future remains uncertain. Do Your Research (DYOR) Independent Projects: LUNA and LUNC are separate projects with distinct goals and functionalities. Evaluate each project on its own merits before making any investment decisions. Overall, while a direct merger between LUNA and LUNC is not possible, there might be potential for future interactions using technologies like IBC. However, these possibilities are still under discussion and their outcome remains uncertain.
Merge between $LUNA and $LUNC ?

No, a direct merger between Luna (LUNA) and Luna Classic (LUNC) is not technically possible. Here's why:

Different Blockchains: LUNA operates on the new Terra blockchain, while LUNC exists on the Terra Classic blockchain, which is a separate network altogether. Merging them would be akin to merging two entirely different databases.

Technical Challenges: There are significant technical hurdles to overcome to merge two separate blockchains. It would be a complex and potentially risky process.

Community Considerations: The communities surrounding LUNA and LUNC have different goals and perspectives. A merger might not be desirable for either community.

However, there have been discussions about potential bridges or interactions between the two ecosystems:

Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC): Some proposals suggest using IBC technology to enable some form of communication or asset transfer between the new Terra and Terra Classic blockchains. This could involve allowing LUNC holders to swap their tokens for LUNA on the new Terra blockchain, potentially with additional incentives.

Wrapped LUNC: Another concept involves creating a "wrapped" version of LUNC that could be used on the new Terra blockchain. However, this wouldn't be a true merger but rather a way to represent LUNC on a different network.

Important Points to Remember:

Uncertain Future: Any potential interactions between LUNA and LUNC are still under discussion and their future remains uncertain.

Do Your Research (DYOR)

Independent Projects: LUNA and LUNC are separate projects with distinct goals and functionalities. Evaluate each project on its own merits before making any investment decisions.

Overall, while a direct merger between LUNA and LUNC is not possible, there might be potential for future interactions using technologies like IBC. However, these possibilities are still under discussion and their outcome remains uncertain.
TerraKRW (KRT) was a stablecoin on the Terra Classic blockchain (previously known as Terra) designed to maintain a 1:1 peg with the South Korean Won (KRW). However, due to the collapse of the Terra Classic ecosystem in May 2022, KRT's peg to the KRW became unstable, and its value significantly declined. Here's a breakdown of TerraKRW (KRT): Before the Crash (May 2022): KRW Stablecoin: KRT aimed to function as a stablecoin, offering a price-stable alternative to the KRW within the Terra Classic ecosystem. This facilitated transactions and potentially provided a hedge against KRW fluctuations. Algorithmic Mechanism: Like other Terra Classic stablecoins, KRT relied on an algorithmic mechanism to maintain its peg to the KRW. This mechanism automatically adjusted the supply and demand of KRT to keep its price close to 1 KRW. After the Crash (May 2022 - Present): Lost Peg: The algorithmic mechanism failed during the Terra Classic ecosystem collapse in May 2022. KRT lost its peg to the KRW, and its price plummeted. Limited Usefulness: With the collapse of the Terra Classic ecosystem, KRT's usability became significantly limited. Its primary purpose of providing a stable KRW alternative within the ecosystem is no longer functional. Low Trading Volume: Trading activity for KRT has significantly decreased due to its lost peg and uncertain future. Current Status of TerraKRW (KRT): Limited Trading: KRT can still be traded on some cryptocurrency exchanges, but its trading volume is very low. High Risk: Investing in KRT carries significant risk due to its lost peg and uncertain future. Alternatives for KRW Stablecoins: New Terra (LUNA) Ecosystem: Following the Terra Classic collapse, a new Terra blockchain emerged with its own stablecoin, TerraUSD (UST), which utilizes a different economic model to maintain its peg to the US dollar. This model combines algorithmic adjustments with a reserve mechanism backed by real-world assets. Other KRW Stablecoins: Several other stablecoins are pegged to the KRW and operate on different blockchains.
TerraKRW (KRT) was a stablecoin on the Terra Classic blockchain (previously known as Terra) designed to maintain a 1:1 peg with the South Korean Won (KRW). However, due to the collapse of the Terra Classic ecosystem in May 2022, KRT's peg to the KRW became unstable, and its value significantly declined.

Here's a breakdown of TerraKRW (KRT):

Before the Crash (May 2022):

KRW Stablecoin: KRT aimed to function as a stablecoin, offering a price-stable alternative to the KRW within the Terra Classic ecosystem. This facilitated transactions and potentially provided a hedge against KRW fluctuations.
Algorithmic Mechanism: Like other Terra Classic stablecoins, KRT relied on an algorithmic mechanism to maintain its peg to the KRW. This mechanism automatically adjusted the supply and demand of KRT to keep its price close to 1 KRW.
After the Crash (May 2022 - Present):

Lost Peg: The algorithmic mechanism failed during the Terra Classic ecosystem collapse in May 2022. KRT lost its peg to the KRW, and its price plummeted.
Limited Usefulness: With the collapse of the Terra Classic ecosystem, KRT's usability became significantly limited. Its primary purpose of providing a stable KRW alternative within the ecosystem is no longer functional.
Low Trading Volume: Trading activity for KRT has significantly decreased due to its lost peg and uncertain future.
Current Status of TerraKRW (KRT):

Limited Trading: KRT can still be traded on some cryptocurrency exchanges, but its trading volume is very low.
High Risk: Investing in KRT carries significant risk due to its lost peg and uncertain future.
Alternatives for KRW Stablecoins:

New Terra (LUNA) Ecosystem: Following the Terra Classic collapse, a new Terra blockchain emerged with its own stablecoin, TerraUSD (UST), which utilizes a different economic model to maintain its peg to the US dollar. This model combines algorithmic adjustments with a reserve mechanism backed by real-world assets.
Other KRW Stablecoins: Several other stablecoins are pegged to the KRW and operate on different blockchains.
TerraMNT (MNT) is a stablecoin pegged to the Mongolian Tögrög (MNT), the official currency of Mongolia. It's part of the Terra ecosystem, a blockchain platform that aims to provide stable and efficient transactions for global users. Key Features of TerraMNT: MNT Pegging: MNT's value is algorithmically maintained to be equivalent to one Mongolian Tögrög. This means that one MNT should always be worth approximately ₮1. Decentralized: MNT is not issued or controlled by any central authority, like a central bank. Instead, it's governed by the Terra community and the underlying blockchain technology. Utility: MNT can be used for various purposes within the Terra ecosystem, including: Transactions: Users can make stable and affordable payments using MNT on the Terra blockchain. Savings: MNT can be held as a store of value, offering a hedge against inflation or currency fluctuations. DeFi Applications: MNT can be used in various DeFi applications within the Terra ecosystem, such as lending and borrowing platforms. Potential Benefits of TerraMNT: Stable Transactions: MNT aims to provide stable and reliable transactions for users in Mongolia and potentially other regions. Hedging Against Inflation: As a stablecoin pegged to the Tögrög, MNT could offer a hedge against inflation or currency fluctuations in Mongolia. Access to DeFi: MNT integration with DeFi applications could expand financial opportunities for users in Mongolia and beyond. Potential Challenges of TerraMNT: Adoption: The success of MNT depends on its adoption by users and businesses in Mongolia and potentially other regions. Regulatory Landscape: Navigating the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies, particularly stablecoins, could pose challenges. Price Stability: Maintaining MNT's peg to the Tögrög requires careful management of the algorithmic mechanism and the underlying reserves. Overall, TerraMNT presents an interesting proposition as a stablecoin pegged to the Mongolian Tögrög. Its potential benefits include stable transactions, hedging against inflation, and access to DeFi.
TerraMNT (MNT) is a stablecoin pegged to the Mongolian Tögrög (MNT), the official currency of Mongolia. It's part of the Terra ecosystem, a blockchain platform that aims to provide stable and efficient transactions for global users.

Key Features of TerraMNT:

MNT Pegging: MNT's value is algorithmically maintained to be equivalent to one Mongolian Tögrög. This means that one MNT should always be worth approximately ₮1.

Decentralized: MNT is not issued or controlled by any central authority, like a central bank. Instead, it's governed by the Terra community and the underlying blockchain technology.

Utility: MNT can be used for various purposes within the Terra ecosystem, including:

Transactions: Users can make stable and affordable payments using MNT on the Terra blockchain.
Savings: MNT can be held as a store of value, offering a hedge against inflation or currency fluctuations.
DeFi Applications: MNT can be used in various DeFi applications within the Terra ecosystem, such as lending and borrowing platforms.
Potential Benefits of TerraMNT:

Stable Transactions: MNT aims to provide stable and reliable transactions for users in Mongolia and potentially other regions.

Hedging Against Inflation: As a stablecoin pegged to the Tögrög, MNT could offer a hedge against inflation or currency fluctuations in Mongolia.

Access to DeFi: MNT integration with DeFi applications could expand financial opportunities for users in Mongolia and beyond.

Potential Challenges of TerraMNT:

Adoption: The success of MNT depends on its adoption by users and businesses in Mongolia and potentially other regions.

Regulatory Landscape: Navigating the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies, particularly stablecoins, could pose challenges.

Price Stability: Maintaining MNT's peg to the Tögrög requires careful management of the algorithmic mechanism and the underlying reserves.

Overall, TerraMNT presents an interesting proposition as a stablecoin pegged to the Mongolian Tögrög. Its potential benefits include stable transactions, hedging against inflation, and access to DeFi.
Terra ağı; TerraUSD (UST): dolar endeksli stabilcoin. TerraKRW (KRT): Güney Kore wonuna endeksli stabilcoin. TerraSDR (SDT): Uluslararası Para Fonu (IMF) tarafından belirlenen özel çekme hakkı (SDR) endeksli bir stabilcoin. TerraMNT (MNT): Moğolistan tögrögüne endeksli stabilcoin
Terra ağı;
TerraUSD (UST): dolar endeksli stabilcoin.
TerraKRW (KRT): Güney Kore wonuna endeksli stabilcoin.
TerraSDR (SDT): Uluslararası Para Fonu (IMF) tarafından belirlenen özel çekme hakkı (SDR) endeksli bir stabilcoin.
TerraMNT (MNT): Moğolistan tögrögüne endeksli stabilcoin
TerraSDR (SDT), Terra ağı üzerinde oluşturulan bir stabilcoin olarak, bu SDR sepetine dayalı olarak değerlenir. Yani, TerraSDR'nin değeri, IMF'nin belirlediği SDR sepetinin değerine endekslenir. Bu stabilcoin, Terra ağı üzerinde finansal işlemlerde kullanılabilir ve SDR sağlar.
TerraSDR (SDT), Terra ağı üzerinde oluşturulan bir stabilcoin olarak, bu SDR sepetine dayalı olarak değerlenir. Yani, TerraSDR'nin değeri, IMF'nin belirlediği SDR sepetinin değerine endekslenir. Bu stabilcoin, Terra ağı üzerinde finansal işlemlerde kullanılabilir ve SDR sağlar.
SDR'nin değeri, ABD doları, euro, Japon yeni, İngiliz sterlini ve Çin yuanı gibi belirli bir sepete dayalı olarak belirlenir. Bu sepetin bileşiminde yer alan para birimlerinin ağırlıkları, IMF tarafından belirlenen bir formül kullanılarak hesaplanır.
SDR'nin değeri, ABD doları, euro, Japon yeni, İngiliz sterlini ve Çin yuanı gibi belirli bir sepete dayalı olarak belirlenir. Bu sepetin bileşiminde yer alan para birimlerinin ağırlıkları, IMF tarafından belirlenen bir formül kullanılarak hesaplanır.
🚨‼️- Özel Çekme Hakkı (Special Drawing Right - SDR), Uluslararası Para Fonu (IMF) tarafından oluşturulan ve kullanılan bir uluslararası rezerv varlığıdır.
🚨‼️- Özel Çekme Hakkı (Special Drawing Right - SDR), Uluslararası Para Fonu (IMF) tarafından oluşturulan ve kullanılan bir uluslararası rezerv varlığıdır.
Последние новости криптовалют
⚡️ Участвуйте в последних обсуждениях в криптомире
💬 Общайтесь с любимыми авторами
👍 Изучайте темы, которые вам интересны
Эл. почта/номер телефона

Последние новости

--
Подробнее
Структура веб-страницы
Cookie Preferences
Правила и условия платформы