La mulți ani, familie! Vă doresc bucurie și emoții în acest | Odyssey Exchange pe Binance Square

Articole în tendințe

Marcată și apreciată

Centrul creatorilor

Vedeți originalul

Odyssey Exchange

--

La mulți ani, familie! Vă doresc bucurie și emoții în acest an precum nu ați experimentat niciodată înainte!

Declinarea răspunderii: Include opinii ale terților. Acesta nu este un sfat financiar. Poate include conținut sponsorizat. Consultați Termenii și condițiile

157

0

Răspunsuri 0

Explorați cele mai recente știri despre criptomonede

⚡️ Luați parte la cele mai recente discuții despre criptomonede

💬 Interacționați cu creatorii dvs. preferați

👍 Bucurați-vă de conținutul care vă interesează

E-mail/Număr de telefon

Creator relevant

Odyssey Exchange

@ansemfake

Explorați mai multe de la acest creator

You open TikTok and an “ investor” posting : “ BTC 200K , XRP $1000, USDT $5 “

--

--

me asking my memecoin everyday

--

You’ve asked me to explain why MiCA regulation is BAD for stablecoins I'll explain you why MiCA regulation is catastrophic for stablecoins. MiCA demands 60% of stablecoin reserves to be held in EU banks. Tether’s USDT is not MiCA compliant because it has US Treasuries as collateral, not EU reserves. MiCA is designed to limit USD stablecoins and protect weak EURO stablecoins. EU stablecoins lack liquid collateral such as bonds or assets like US Treasuries. MiCA forces issuers to hold 60% of reserves in EU banks, where stablecoins are treated as liabilities. Banks reinvest these reserves in low-risk assets like Euro bonds, which are less liquid that US Treasuries. This rule increases risk for stablecoin issuers, with no benefit to EU banks - unless they issue stablecoins themselves. MiCA ignores systemic risks of relying on fragile banks for stablecoin reserves. Circle's USDC held 10% of reserves in Silicon Valley Bank. When SVB collapsed in 2023, USDC’s peg fell to $0.80 due to $3 billion of trapped reserves. SVB collapsed on a Friday, redemptions froze until Monday due to banking closures. Coinbase also froze withdrawals, to see if US government would bail out SVB depositors. This crisis proved one thing: US Treasuries are safest collateral for stablecoins! MiCA risks driving EURO stablecoins backward. EU’s reliance on legacy banking creates systemic risks for stablecoins under MiCA. Instead of innovation, MiCA forces issuers into fragile, outdated systems that increase risk for everyone. You need to understand: MiCA doesn’t add rules - it adds RISKS! 1. MiCA offers no benefit for EU stablecoins, which lack liquidity of US Treasuries. 2. MiCA drives USD stablecoins out of Europe, leaving the market fragmented. 3. MiCA forces reliance on legacy banks, which are prone to failure. Stablecoins succeed with safe, liquid reserves like US Treasuries. Not when they're trapped in risky, outdated banking systems. What’s your view? Will MiCA help Europe lead - or fall behind in crypto innovation? 👇 Let’s discuss in comments.

--

Which pill is for ya ?

--

Ultimele știri

Gold And Bitcoin Gain Prominence Amid Currency Devaluation Concerns

--

Chilean Lawmakers Consider Legislation For Strategic Bitcoin Reserves

--

Bitcoin(BTC) Surpasses 98,000 USDT with a Narrowed 0.02% Decrease in 24 Hours

--

Ethereum(ETH) Drops Below 3,600 USDT with a Narrowed 0.80% Increase in 24 Hours

--

BNB Drops Below 710 USDT with a Narrowed 0.01% Increase in 24 Hours

--

Vedeți mai multe

Harta site-ului

Preferințe cookie

Termenii și condițiile platformei

Harta site-ului

Termenii și condițiile platformei

Preferințe cookie