4,5 trilioane $SHIB trimis între balene anon, deoarece prețu | marekvesi1973 pe Binance Square

Articole în tendințe

Marcate și apreciate

Centrul creatorilor

--

4,5 trilioane $SHIB trimis între balene anon, deoarece prețul crește peste noapte.  #crypto  #CryptoNews  #cryptoshark  #shibainu  #cryptocurrency  

Declinarea răspunderii: Include opinii ale terților. Acesta nu este un sfat financiar. Poate include conținut sponsorizat. Consultați Termenii și condițiile

SHIB

0,00001209

+1.68%

34

0

Explorați cele mai recente știri despre criptomonede

⚡️ Luați parte la cele mai recente discuții despre criptomonede

💬 Interacționați cu creatorii dvs. preferați

👍 Bucurați-vă de conținutul care vă interesează

E-mail/Număr de telefon

Creator relevant

@Square-Creator-466d79914

Explorați mai multe de la acest creator

100 x🚀potential GEM 💎 $VELO token .Not listed yet on Binance

--

Graphlinq token GLQ future GEM 💎

--

ElonMusk and #MarkCuban are backing the defendants in a Supreme Court case against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (#SEC) Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban have jointly filed an amicus brief backing the defendants in a Supreme Court case against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). “It is important that the SEC not be permitted to pick and choose whether parties are granted their constitutional right to jury trials or are forced to proceed in enforcement proceedings with administrative law judges immune from proper and meaningful oversight,” the lawyers for the billionaires stressed. Tesla CEO Elon Musk, Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban, and several others jointly filed an amicus brief to the Supreme Court on Wednesday, expressing support in a case that contests the validity of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)’s administrative proceedings. The billionaires’ amicus brief was joined by Phillip Goldstein, Nelson Obus, Manouch Moshayedi, and the Investor Choice Advocates Network (ICAN). The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear the SEC v. Jarkesy case on Nov. 29. The case challenges the constitutionality of the SEC’s use of in-house judges. Plaintiff George Jarkesy argued that the SEC’s internal, juryless adjudication process by a commission-appointed administrative law judge is unconstitutional because it violates his Seventh Amendment right to a trial by jury. The amicus brief notes that the SEC began handling more cases internally between 2013 and 2014, after suffering “a series of jury trial losses in insider trading cases.” The filing states that amici have an interest in the outcome of this case because they believe: It is important that the SEC not be permitted to pick and choose whether parties are granted their constitutional right to jury trials or are forced to proceed in enforcement proceedings with administrative law judges (ALJs) immune from proper and meaningful oversight.#cryptocurrency #cryptoshark #CryptoNews #SEC #crypto

--

What’s the next BIG #crypto trend that will explode before the end of 2023? 🔥 GLQ token , $VELO token , Gashaa(CAS), $CLV ,$FLOW , Solanium $SLIM

--

#MyFirstFeedPost Hello, Binance Square!

--

Ultimele știri

Top Trader Predicts Market Stagnation Without Major Interventions

--

Bitcoin(BTC) Drops Below 83,000 USDT with a Narrowed 3.08% Increase in 24 Hours

--

Movement's Total Value Locked Surpasses $100 Million

--

SEC Considers Temporary Crypto Regulation Framework

--

U.S. Senate Democrats Propose Clean Cloud Act Targeting Emissions

--

Vedeți mai multe

Harta site-ului

Preferințe cookie

Termenii și condițiile platformei

Harta site-ului

Termenii și condițiile platformei

Preferințe cookie