Recently, the blockchain community exploded! The newly launched trading tool by dappOS—IntentEX—has triggered a new round of heated discussions about the future of on-chain trading with its fees as low as 0.1%, institutional-level liquidity, and speed comparable to centralized exchanges (CEX). Some say it can break CEX's monopoly, while others argue it is just another form of DEX (decentralized exchange). Today, let's take a look at what exactly makes IntentEX stir the entire market!
The three major 'killer features' of IntentEX
1. Market-wide liquidity, trading prices 'rolled' to the extreme
What is the old problem with on-chain exchanges? The liquidity is too poor; as soon as a large order is placed, the price skyrockets. IntentEX solves this by distributing user order tasks (Intent Tasks) to multiple nodes through the dappOS service node network, directly capturing institutional-level liquidity.
Translated, it means: No matter how large your order is, you can quickly find the best price to execute.
2. Instant transactions, faster than block production?
How fast is IntentEX's transaction confirmation speed? dappOS, through its exclusive OMS mechanism (Order Management System), allows the transaction confirmation speed to exceed the block production speed of the blockchain itself. This sounds like cheating, but the logic behind it is quite simple: IntentEX's nodes complete task confirmations before the transaction is fully on-chain, giving users an almost instant trading experience.
3. Low fees that make you question life
CEX's fees generally range from 0.2% to 0.3%, while IntentEX has directly reduced its fees to 0.1%. Why is it so low? Because it relies on the opBNB chain, which serves as a low-cost and efficient settlement layer, reducing the cost of on-chain resource usage. At the same time, decentralized operations save the cumbersome operational costs that CEX incurs.
What does IntentEX mean for the market?
1. CEX's 'core advantages' are being replicated
What is the biggest selling point of CEX? Speed, liquidity, and user experience. IntentEX just happens to use a decentralized approach to bring these advantages on-chain while also solving CEX's 'fatal problems': lack of transparency and asset storage risks. In IntentEX, the entire trading process is recorded on-chain, ensuring safety and transparency.
2. The pain points of DEX have been penetrated
Traditional DEX has two major flaws: liquidity and speed. IntentEX addresses these two issues with its service node network and the efficient settlement of opBNB, effectively raising DEX to a higher level. Some have even begun to call it 'DEX 2.0.'
Controversy: Can IntentEX eliminate CEX?
This is where the most heated discussions arise. Some say CEX has established deep user habits and trust barriers, making it almost impossible for decentralized exchanges to disrupt; but others believe that the efficiency and cost advantages brought by IntentEX will gradually erode CEX's market share.
• Supporting views for IntentEX:
"Decentralization is the future. IntentEX solves the core problems of DEX, and the days of CEX are numbered."
• Supporting views for CEX:
"No matter how strong the liquidity, the user experience of on-chain trading still cannot fully match CEX. IntentEX can only be a supplement, not a replacement."
• Neutral camp:
"IntentEX is indeed an innovation, but CEX has financial attributes while DEX has technical attributes; the two may coexist in the long term."
300,000 USD airdrop: The starting point of the Web3 new era?
Did you think IntentEX was just a technological innovation? **Wrong, it is also the clarion call for dappOS to declare war on the market.** This time, they are directly offering a 300,000 USD airdrop, which not only attracts users but also builds an ecosystem for their intent trading. It is also noteworthy that the opBNB chain behind IntentEX will gain more attention due to this deep integration.
So the question is: Would you give up CEX for IntentEX?
Conclusion: Is the future of trading centralized or decentralized?
From the user's perspective, trading experience is always the highest priority. The emergence of IntentEX has taken a revolutionary step for decentralized exchanges, but whether it can fully replace CEX in the future will still need time and market validation.
See you in the comments! Share your thoughts: Are you a CEX die-hard fan or a supporter of IntentEX's future? In this battle of 'centralization vs decentralization,' which side are you on?