More AI Agent framework standards disputes are in full swing, and the performance of the ARC secondary market has been particularly eye-catching in recent days. How should we understand this AI application development framework built on Rust? What are the differences between the ARC and ELIZA frameworks? From a technical logic perspective and a business perspective, here’s my understanding:

1) ELIZA is a multi-client integration framework based on TypeScript architecture aimed at Agent development. In other words, ELIZA is an 'assembler' that focuses on integrating various LLM large models and the input and output functions of platforms like Discord and Twitter. It provides memory context management and model fine-tuning algorithm optimization features, helping developers quickly deploy AI Agents.

ELIZA addresses the 'access' problem to ensure that developers can quickly implement AI Agents. Its focus is on standardizing interface specifications, simplifying integration processes, lowering development thresholds, and enabling LLMs to be 'used' effectively in cross-platform applications.

2) Rig (ARC) is an AI system construction framework based on the Rust language, aimed at LLM workflow engines. It aims to solve deeper performance optimization issues. In other words, ARC is an AI engine 'toolbox' that provides background support services such as AI calling, performance optimization, data storage, and exception handling.

Rig aims to solve the 'call' problem to help developers better select LLMs, optimize prompts, manage tokens more effectively, and handle concurrency, manage resources, and reduce latency. Its focus is on how to 'make good use of it' during the collaboration process between AI LLM models and AI Agent systems.

3) The above is a very objective technical logic breakdown. Everyone must be interested in who has greater developmental potential between ELIZA and ARC? Here are some evaluation criteria:

1. AI Agents are in the early stages of ecological explosion, where having an early market reputation and active ecological developers is more important. Similar to the early development of the EVM chain operation framework, technologies like EOS, which are more advanced and suitable for commercial use, seemed to become the market focus temporarily but ultimately lost to the vast developer ecosystem of EVM.

2. ELIZA's burden lies in the immature Tokenomics design of ai16z, the 'empowerment' issues of the ai16z and ELIZA open-source framework tokens, and the variable of whether the subsequent family of tools will add 'new members.' This will inevitably lead to a lack of short-term growth momentum for its tokens, whereas ARC seems to lack this burden.

3. The problem with ARC is that it depicts a grand, high-performance, enterprise-level commercial framework more suitable for the future AI Agent ecosystem. However, it needs to gradually prove to the market that this 'advanced' capability is not just a facade; it must timely deliver some standalone AI applications and visible AI Agent innovative gameplay.