Sim

Unexpectedly
The icon of Musk just suddenly expressed his stance
On December 7, the American icon billionaire Elon Musk posted on social media, stating that he would not use his growing influence in the Trump icon administration to attack or retaliate against industry competitors. This statement has sparked heated discussions, as Musk is known for his bold and controversial business practices. In recent years, Musk has been making rapid progress in multiple fields, from electric vehicles to space exploration, and even social media, being almost ubiquitous. His interactions with the American political arena have also become more frequent, especially regarding his stance on some key policy issues, which reveals his political ambitions. In this context, his public statement of "not retaliating against competitors" inevitably reminds people of historical cases where some business giants used power for personal gain, such as Rockefeller's icon monopoly empire, which ultimately led to the birth of antitrust laws. However, the key question is whether Musk can consistently maintain this kind of "generosity"? The business world is inherently competitive, especially in the tech sector, where conflicts of interest are unavoidable. Do you think an entrepreneur who conquers territories in the business field can truly achieve "not harming others" politically?