tether

Pasaulē kriptovalūtām, kur decentralizācija ir viens no galvenajiem principiem, saglabājas arī nepieciešamība kontrolēt nelikumīgas darbības. Nesen kļuva zināms, ka vadošo stabilo monētu emitenti, Tether (USDT) un Circle (USDC), ir iesaldējuši ievērojamus savas aktīvu apjomus noteiktās adresēs.
Šodienas datumiem, Tether ir iesaldējis USDT summā, kas pārsniedz 1.3 miljardus dolāru dažādās adresēs, kas bija saistītas ar noziedzīgām darbībām vai sankcijām. Circle, savukārt, ir bloķējusi USDC summā, kas pārsniedz 230 miljonus dolāru. Šīs darbības tiek veiktas sadarbībā ar tiesību aizsardzības iestādēm un regulētājiem, lai cīnītos pret naudas atmazgāšanu, terorisma finansēšanu un citām nelikumīgām operācijām.

#Tron

When you step back from the price charts and legal headlines, something quieter but more revealing is happening across blockchains. It shows up not in hype cycles, but in transaction logs. Stablecoins are moving. A lot. And increasingly, they are moving on TRON. So much so that stablecoin activity on Tron now outweighs the total transaction volume of the XRP Ledger by more than ten times. That is not a marginal difference. It is a structural one.
This gap matters because stablecoins are no longer a side feature of crypto. They are the infrastructure. They are how traders park capital between positions, how businesses move dollars across borders, and how individuals in unstable currencies protect purchasing power. When stablecoins choose a network, they usually do so for very practical reasons. Speed. Cost. Reliability. And the ability to just work, day after day, without drama.
Tron has quietly optimized itself for exactly that kind of usage. It is not flashy. It does not try to be everything at once. Instead, it has become extremely good at one thing: moving stablecoins cheaply and consistently. Fees are low enough that users do not think about them. Transactions settle quickly. Wallet support is widespread. For people sending funds multiple times a day, those details add up fast.
By contrast, XRP was built with a more ambitious vision in mind. From the beginning, the XRP Ledger positioned itself as a bridge for global payments, especially between financial institutions. Technically, it does what it promises. It is fast, efficient, and scalable. But usage does not automatically follow design. Real-world adoption depends on who actually needs the tool today, not who might need it tomorrow.
In practice, much of XRP’s activity still revolves around trading, treasury movements, and selective institutional pilots. These are meaningful, but they are not high-frequency by nature. A bank testing cross-border settlement does not generate millions of daily transactions. Stablecoin users do. Merchants, brokers, remittance operators, and everyday users moving funds between wallets generate constant flow. That is where Tron has embedded itself.
A big part of this story revolves around Tether. USDT on Tron has become one of the most widely used dollar representations in crypto. It is especially prevalent in regions where access to banking is limited, slow, or expensive. In those environments, Tron-based USDT functions less like a speculative asset and more like digital cash. People receive it, send it, and hold it because it solves immediate problems.
Once a network becomes the default for that kind of activity, momentum builds naturally. Liquidity attracts more liquidity. Wallets prioritize what users already have. Businesses integrate what their customers already use. Over time, this creates a feedback loop that is difficult to displace, even if alternative networks offer comparable technology.
There is also an important behavioral aspect here. Tron’s stablecoin transfers tend to be simple. Wallet to wallet. Exchange to exchange. Business to customer. These transactions do not rely heavily on complex smart contracts or experimental features. That simplicity reduces friction and failure points. For users moving real money with real consequences, predictability often matters more than innovation.
XRP’s lower volume should not be read as irrelevance. It reflects a different lane. XRP’s strategy has leaned toward regulation-friendly adoption and institutional alignment. Those paths move slowly by design. They involve compliance checks, partnerships, and gradual rollout. If global banks eventually adopt blockchain-based settlement at scale, XRP could see meaningful growth. But that future is still unfolding.
What Tron’s dominance in stablecoin activity reveals is how crypto is actually being used right now. Not as a replacement for all finance, but as a parallel system that fills gaps traditional infrastructure leaves open. Cross-border payments that settle instantly. Dollar access without a bank account. Capital movement without business hours. These use cases generate volume because they are lived daily, not announced occasionally.
The tenfold difference in transaction activity also challenges how success in crypto is measured. Market capitalization captures speculation. Developer activity captures potential. Transaction volume captures behavior. It shows where people are already relying on the technology, even if they never talk about it publicly.
None of this is guaranteed to stay the same. Regulation around stablecoins could tighten. Issuers could shift strategies. New networks could undercut costs further. XRP’s institutional focus could pay off if large-scale payment rails finally migrate on-chain. But for now, the data points to a clear reality.
Crypto’s most important work is happening quietly. It is happening in stablecoin transfers, not headlines. And at this moment, Tron is carrying a disproportionate share of that load. Not because it tells a better story, but because it fits into how people actually move money today.

#Tether

Stabilkoinu stabilitāte tiek pārbaudīta, jo Terraform iesniedz prasību pret Jump Crypto
Terra sabrukums 2022. gadā atkal ir uzmanības centrā, pēc tam, kad Terraform Labs iesniedza $4 miljardu prasību pret Jump Crypto, apgalvojot par slepenām tirgus veidošanas darbībām, lai atbalstītu UST stabilkoinu saistību.
Saskaņā ar prasību Jump it kā saņēma labvēlīgus nosacījumus $LUNA apmaiņā pret diskrētām iejaukšanās, lai stabilizētu TerraUSD pie $1. Lai gan Jump noliedz pārkāpumus, lieta atjauno neērtu jautājumu nozarei: vai stabilkoini tiek atbalstīti ar rezervēm - vai ar aizkadra likviditātes manevriem?