The most important is Ripple’s stablecoin launch delayed but still possible by year-end

$HBAR $XRP Holders, consider HBAR.
Hedera vs Ripple Technical Comparison

If we're pitting Hedera Hashgraph's HBAR against Ripple's XRP, HBAR clearly outshines XRP in a few critical ways. First, let’s talk about technology. HBAR operates on a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) structure powered by the patented Hashgraph consensus algorithm. This design isn't just flashy jargon—it’s objectively faster and more secure. HBAR achieves over 10,000 transactions per second (TPS) with almost instant finality (a few seconds), leaving XRP's respectable but lesser 1,500 TPS in the dust. Plus, HBAR offers asynchronous Byzantine Fault Tolerance (aBFT) security, making it incredibly resilient against attacks and ensuring fair transaction ordering.

Energy efficiency? HBAR dominates here too. Its lightweight consensus mechanism is far more sustainable than traditional blockchains, giving it an edge for enterprises focused on ESG compliance. XRP also has low energy usage but lacks the broader enterprise appeal that Hedera enjoys.

Speaking of enterprise adoption, HBAR's Governing Council, which includes heavyweights like Google, IBM, and Boeing, is a testament to its credibility. This governance structure ensures decentralization while maintaining high standards. Ripple’s XRP, on the other hand, is closely tied to Ripple Labs, raising centralization concerns, especially since Ripple controls a large portion of XRP's supply.

While XRP is a leader in cross-border payments with established partnerships (like Santander and American Express), it’s narrowly focused on financial services. HBAR, however, spreads its wings across industries, excelling in supply chain tracking, identity verification, and even carbon offsetting. Add Ripple’s ongoing legal battles with the SEC, and the choice becomes even clearer: HBAR is the versatile, future-ready champion of blockchain tech.