ホーム
通知
プロフィール
トレンド記事
ニュース
ブックマークといいね済み
クリエイターセンター
設定
Uncle Mose
--
フォロー
$NOT
価格は0.020まで下落し、その後反発するだろう
免責事項：第三者の意見を含みます。当社による金銭的な助言ではありません。スポンサーのコンテンツが含まれる場合があります。
利用規約をご覧ください。
NOT
0.002284
+5.20%
385
0
暗号資産関連最新ニュース総まとめ
⚡️ 暗号資産に関する最新のディスカッションに参加
💬 お気に入りのクリエイターと交流
👍 興味のあるコンテンツがきっと見つかります
メール / 電話番号
登録
ログイン
関連クリエイター
Uncle Mose
@unclemose74
フォロー
クリエイターからの情報をさらに見る
noted
--
$TON A message by Durev ❤️ Thanks everyone for your support and love! Last month I got interviewed by police for 4 days after arriving in Paris. I was told I may be personally responsible for other people’s illegal use of Telegram, because the French authorities didn’t receive responses from Telegram. This was surprising for several reasons: 1. Telegram has an official representative in the EU that accepts and replies to EU requests. Its email address has been publicly available for anyone in the EU who googles “Telegram EU address for law enforcement”. 2. The French authorities had numerous ways to reach me to request assistance. As a French citizen, I was a frequent guest at the French consulate in Dubai. A while ago, when asked, I personally helped them establish a hotline with Telegram to deal with the threat of terrorism in France. 3. If a country is unhappy with an internet service, the established practice is to start a legal action against the service itself. Using laws from the pre-smartphone era to charge a CEO with crimes committed by third parties on the platform he manages is a misguided approach. Building technology is hard enough as it is. No innovator will ever build new tools if they know they can be personally held responsible for potential abuse of those tools. Establishing the right balance between privacy and security is not easy. You have to reconcile privacy laws with law enforcement requirements, and local laws with EU laws. You have to take into account technological limitations. As a platform, you want your processes to be consistent globally, while also ensuring they are not abused in countries with weak rule of law. We’ve been committed to engaging with regulators to find the right balance. Yes, we stand by our principles: our experience is shaped by our mission to protect our users in authoritarian regimes. But we’ve always been open to dialogue. Sometimes we can’t agree with a country’s regulator on the right balance between privacy and security. In those cases, we are ready to leave that country.
--
Yes is time to hope in and make profit on $NOT now before is too late
--
$NOT I'm really disappointed in Notcoin this circle I expect more than that shitty performance
--
$NOT volume is too low but the price is ok think
--
最新ニュース
連邦準備制度、銀行の暗号活動に関するガイダンスを撤回
--
イーサリアムのレイヤー2スケーリング戦略、手数料引き下げで議論を巻き起こす
--
米国とウクライナの会談、結果はまちまちと特使が述べる
--
トランプ、ウクライナ・ロシア停戦交渉の期限を設定
--
連邦準備制度、貿易戦争による潜在的な雇用喪失について警告
--
詳細確認
サイトマップ
Cookieの設定
プラットフォーム利用規約
