ホーム
通知
プロフィール
トレンド記事
ニュース
ブックマークといいね済み
クリエイターセンター
設定
SilverWolfBtc
--
ブリッシュ
フォロー
$RENDER
$6.822でさらに1つの限界買い注文を出しています。全体の市場から10-15%の修正を期待しています。これ以上になる可能性もありますが、私が期待している最小限です。
#NFA✅
#Dyor2024
チップを送る
0人がクリエイターにチップを送りました。
免責事項：第三者の意見を含みます。当社による金銭的な助言ではありません。スポンサーのコンテンツが含まれる場合があります。
利用規約をご覧ください。
211
0
暗号資産関連最新ニュース総まとめ
⚡️ 暗号資産に関する最新のディスカッションに参加
💬 お気に入りのクリエイターと交流
👍 興味のあるコンテンツがきっと見つかります
メール / 電話番号
登録
ログイン
関連クリエイター
SilverWolfBtc
@SilverWolfBtc
フォロー
クリエイターからの情報をさらに見る
$BNB Looks good here
--
Breaking: Gold creates history by crossing $3400 first time ever. $BTC will follow soon. #gold #BTC走势分析
--
In trading, losses are inevitable — but they can be managed. Win big, lose small. How? By thrashing your ego. If you lose a trade, you lose a trade. Accept it. Admit you were wrong and cut the position. Don’t blame the market. “The setup was perfect, but market manipulation happened or some news killed it” — doesn’t matter. You were on the wrong side. Own it and move on. If you're winning a trade, have the confidence to add more. Why? Because you chose the right side — trust your work and shows confidence in yourself. In short: cut losers, add to winners. Both need skills.
--
$SUI Price is at a crucial support zone and is currently trying to hold the 0.000025 level. This is a major level — if price loses this, then it could drop hard from here. Although if you compare it with other pairs against BTC, SUI is comparatively stronger. There is no clear sign of reversal yet, as price hasn't stabilized above the support level. The chart needs patience so that price can give a clear signal. The only thing you can do now is watch closely. Once SUI/BTC shows a proper reclaim, it could be a sign of reversal. By "proper reclaim," I mean retests by price, not just quick wicks. Disclaimer: This is just an educational post not a financial advice. Please do your own research before posting anything. #SUI🔥
--
Binance vs. HyperLiquid: The JellyJelly Conflict Do you know about this? I'll explain the incident that happened this week: A whale, reportedly connected to Binance, opened a 6 million USDT short on a low-cap token called JellyJelly. Then, they pumped the price themselves, causing their own position to be force-liquidated. This left HyperLiquid stuck with a “toxic” short, losing over 10 million USDT and facing the risk of collapse. Another twist in the story is that Binance later listed JellyJelly. Was this a coordinated attack to crush a rising DeFi star? Unlike previous instances when centralized exchanges helped platforms recover from hacks, this time their response was silence. HyperLiquid responded by delisting JellyJelly and closing all positions, trying to end the crisis, but the damage was done. I have one question for all of you, by the way. I know the answer, but I would like to see if you also understand this. So, the question is: If the whale got liquidated and lost the trade, then HyperLiquid lost more than 10 million on this trade—shouldn’t the protocol profit from the forced liquidation? Please write in comments.
--
最新ニュース
ハッカーによって侵害されたLidoオラクルマルチシグアドレス
--
OpenAIとMicrosoftが新たな資金調達と将来のIPO計画について議論
--
マイケル・セイラーがビットコントラッカーの更新を共有
--
Lido DAO、オラクルキー漏洩の懸念に対する緊急対策を提案
--
アメリカ政府の暗号通貨保有額が211.56億ドルに達する
--
詳細確認
サイトマップ
Cookieの設定
プラットフォーム利用規約
