• XRP’s investigation began in 2018 when it ranked 3rd in market cap, while Ethereum faced less SEC scrutiny.

  • CPAC filed complaints citing Hinman’s potential conflicts due to his ties with Ethereum’s Enterprise Ethereum Alliance.

  • Internal SEC emails suggest Ethereum benefited from regulatory clarity, contrasting with XRP’s classification as a security.

Bill Morgan, a prominent pro-XRP lawyer, has reiterated claims of biassed regulatory practices by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), accusing them of favouring Ethereum over XRP. His comments, shared on social media, reflect broader allegations involving former SEC official William Hinman. 

Morgan questioned the SEC’s activities, noting that Ripple’s investigation started in April 2018, when XRP ranked the third biggest cryptocurrency by market capitalization after Ethereum. He also argued that XRP was caught in unjustifiably high levels of regulatory attention from the SEC. 

But it is all just a grand conspiracy of the XRP community . It is good summary and that is without even taking into account that the SEC started investigating Ripple, at a time when XRP was number 3 in market cap behind Ethereum, in April 2018 while the draft of the Hinman… https://t.co/D4j5j6vG1p

— bill morgan (@Belisarius2020) May 29, 2024

CPAC Files Formal Complaints

The CPAC Foundation’s Center for Regulatory Freedom has submitted formal complaints to the New York and California Bar Associations. These complaints allege unethical behaviour and conflicts of interest during Hinman’s tenure at the SEC. 

Andrew Langer, Director of the CPAC Foundation’s Center for Regulatory Freedom, stated that Hinman’s actions raise serious ethical questions. The complaints emphasise the potential conflict of interest, noting that Hinman’s former firm, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, was involved with the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance, potentially benefiting from Ethereum’s regulatory status.

The CPAC complaint draws on internal SEC emails and external communications uncovered during the discovery process in the ongoing SEC lawsuit against Ripple Labs. These documents include dialogues with Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin before Hinman’s speech.

Critics argue that these communications suggest Ethereum received preferential treatment compared to XRP. Morgan’s remarks and CPAC’s actions underscore the intensifying scrutiny of Hinman’s regulatory decisions. 

The crux lies in Hinman’s speech in 2018 when he stressed that Ethereum cannot be considered a security. At the time of reporting, XRP traded at $0.52907, reflecting ongoing market reactions to these developments.

Read Also:

  • Crypto Market Reacts to SEC’s Complaint Against Binance

  • SEC Deletes Hinman’s Bio From Site as June 13 Deadline Looms

  • Bill Hinman’s Calendar Reveal May Spell Trouble for Ethereum

  • BTC and ETH Rebound in V-Shaped Recovery Despite SEC Complaint

  • Broker Complaint Alert (BCA) Marks 3 Years of Successful Crypto Scam Recovery, Bringing Hope to Victims Worldwide

The post XRP Lawyer Alleges SEC Bias, CPAC Files Ethics Complaints appeared first on Crypto News Land.