Opinions de A H Rizbie(@ahrizbie)

Voir l’original

--

avais-je raison ?

LIVE

A H Rizbie

--

Haussier

$NOT est le futur

Avertissement : comprend des opinions de tiers. Il ne s’agit pas d’un conseil financier. Peut inclure du contenu sponsorisé. Consultez les CG.

3

0

Réponses 0

Découvrez les dernières actus sur les cryptos

⚡️ Prenez part aux dernières discussions sur les cryptos

💬 Interagissez avec vos créateur(trice)s préféré(e)s

👍 Profitez du contenu qui vous intéresse

Adresse e-mail/Numéro de téléphone

Créateur pertinent

LIVE

A H Rizbie

@ahrizbie

Découvrez-en plus sur le créateur

$NOT Lounchpool coming soon... $NOT become a ecosystem/project cooker $NOT is a Hope.....

--

$NOT will Touch again $0.01 in October then slowly in November it will go $0.02+ N.B : Notcoins second project lost dogs ended and it ($woof) will list end of October in binance,bybit,okx etc and early third project Not pixel got so many popularity and it ($PX) will list end of November in binance,bybit,okx etc .

--

Now $NOT coin is 0.0105 as I said at 24 SEP when $NOT coin was 0.0074 said $NOT coin will be 0.01 in next week but some toxic public obscenities me at this moment I want to say them See and cry

--

$NOT will touch $0.01 in next week (mark my word)

--

❤️ Thanks everyone for your support and love! Last month I got interviewed by police for 4 days after arriving in Paris. I was told I may be personally responsible for other people’s illegal use of Telegram, because the French authorities didn’t receive responses from Telegram. This was surprising for several reasons: 1. Telegram has an official representative in the EU that accepts and replies to EU requests. Its email address has been publicly available for anyone in the EU who googles “Telegram EU address for law enforcement”. 2. The French authorities had numerous ways to reach me to request assistance. As a French citizen, I was a frequent guest at the French consulate in Dubai. A while ago, when asked, I personally helped them establish a hotline with Telegram to deal with the threat of terrorism in France. 3. If a country is unhappy with an internet service, the established practice is to start a legal action against the service itself. Using laws from the pre-smartphone era to charge a CEO with crimes committed by third parties on the platform he manages is a misguided approach. Building technology is hard enough as it is. No innovator will ever build new tools if they know they can be personally held responsible for potential abuse of those tools. Establishing the right balance between privacy and security is not easy. You have to reconcile privacy laws with law enforcement requirements, and local laws with EU laws. You have to take into account technological limitations. As a platform, you want your processes to be consistent globally, while also ensuring they are not abused in countries with weak rule of law. We’ve been committed to engaging with regulators to find the right balance. Yes, we stand by our principles: our experience is shaped by our mission to protect our users in authoritarian regimes. But we’ve always been open to dialogue. Sometimes....... $TON $NOT $DOGS will be moon soon ( mark my word)

--

Dernières actualités

Lancement d'ApeChain et du pont officiel inter-chaînes avec la montée en flèche des pièces Meme

--

ApeChain et le pont cross-chain officiel sont désormais disponibles

--

Pump.fun lance un terminal de trading avancé avec des plans de jetons futurs

--

Le PDG de Ripple salue la réglementation des crypto-monnaies au Brésil

--

Bluesky dépasse les 12 millions d'utilisateurs grâce aux changements de la plateforme X

--

Cookie Preferences

CGU de la plateforme

ba-one-trust-cookie