Opinions de marekvesi1973(@Square-Creator-466d79914)

Voir l’original

marekvesi1973

--

#MyFirstFeedPost  Bonjour, Binance Square !

Avertissement : comprend des opinions de tiers. Il ne s’agit pas d’un conseil financier. Peut inclure du contenu sponsorisé. Consultez les CG.

26

0

Réponses 0

Découvrez les dernières actus sur les cryptos

⚡️ Prenez part aux dernières discussions sur les cryptos

💬 Interagissez avec vos créateur(trice)s préféré(e)s

👍 Profitez du contenu qui vous intéresse

Adresse e-mail/Numéro de téléphone

Créateur pertinent

LIVE

marekvesi1973

@Square-Creator-466d79914

Découvrez-en plus sur le créateur

100 x🚀potential GEM 💎 $VELO token .Not listed yet on Binance

--

Graphlinq token GLQ future GEM 💎

--

ElonMusk and #MarkCuban are backing the defendants in a Supreme Court case against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (#SEC) Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban have jointly filed an amicus brief backing the defendants in a Supreme Court case against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). “It is important that the SEC not be permitted to pick and choose whether parties are granted their constitutional right to jury trials or are forced to proceed in enforcement proceedings with administrative law judges immune from proper and meaningful oversight,” the lawyers for the billionaires stressed. Tesla CEO Elon Musk, Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban, and several others jointly filed an amicus brief to the Supreme Court on Wednesday, expressing support in a case that contests the validity of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)’s administrative proceedings. The billionaires’ amicus brief was joined by Phillip Goldstein, Nelson Obus, Manouch Moshayedi, and the Investor Choice Advocates Network (ICAN). The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear the SEC v. Jarkesy case on Nov. 29. The case challenges the constitutionality of the SEC’s use of in-house judges. Plaintiff George Jarkesy argued that the SEC’s internal, juryless adjudication process by a commission-appointed administrative law judge is unconstitutional because it violates his Seventh Amendment right to a trial by jury. The amicus brief notes that the SEC began handling more cases internally between 2013 and 2014, after suffering “a series of jury trial losses in insider trading cases.” The filing states that amici have an interest in the outcome of this case because they believe: It is important that the SEC not be permitted to pick and choose whether parties are granted their constitutional right to jury trials or are forced to proceed in enforcement proceedings with administrative law judges (ALJs) immune from proper and meaningful oversight.#cryptocurrency #cryptoshark #CryptoNews #SEC #crypto

--

What’s the next BIG #crypto trend that will explode before the end of 2023? 🔥 GLQ token , $VELO token , Gashaa(CAS), $CLV ,$FLOW , Solanium $SLIM

--

4.5 trillion $SHIB sent between anon whales as the price soars overnight. #crypto #CryptoNews #cryptoshark #shibainu #cryptocurrency

--

Dernières actualités

Le Bitcoin dépasse les 106 000 dollars, puis recule avant la baisse des taux de la Fed

--

Le Royaume-Uni envisage d'interdire les offres publiques de cryptomonnaies

--

Le ratio Bitcoin/or atteint un niveau record alors que le BTC dépasse les 106 000 $

--

Les produits d'investissement en actifs numériques atteignent un record de 44,5 milliards de dollars depuis le début de l'année

--

Le Bitcoin (BTC) tombe sous les 104 000 USDT avec une hausse réduite de 1,37 % en 24 heures

--

Cookie Preferences

CGU de la plateforme

ba-one-trust-cookie