Binance Square
LIVE
LIVE
Crypto De Nostradame
--24.7k views
There is a new development in the incident where the SEC was hacked and announced the approval of a fake Bitcoin Spot ETF. Cryptocurrency journalist Eleanor Terrett shed new light on the infamous SEC hack that occurred on January 9. The hack, which led to an unauthorized early announcement regarding the approval of Bitcoin Spot ETFs, is being investigated by several outside agencies, including the SEC, the Office of the Inspector General, and the FBI The last update from the SEC on January 22 showed that the investigation was continuing. However, Terrett's statement reveals that the SEC's Office of Inspector General (OIG) has appointed an independent company to review the information security program, which includes cybersecurity and infrastructure security, in 2023. Upon examination, it was determined that the program was incomplete; This fact was not widely known because the report was located inconspicuously on the SEC's website and was dated December 20, 2023 According to CoinDesk, the fallout from the hack was significant, with losses of approximately $90 million reported in Bitcoin liquidations. Despite the seriousness of the incident, SEC Chairman Gary Gensler did not mention this report in his responses to members of Congress about the hack. This situation raises serious questions about the SEC's stance on cybersecurity and its accountability in the face of such incidents. Terrett poses a thought-provoking question: “Imagine what the SEC would do if a public company became aware of a security vulnerability, failed to fix it, and was then hacked? Would the SEC have any reaction? $BTC $ETH $BNB

There is a new development in the incident where the SEC was hacked and announced the approval of a fake Bitcoin Spot ETF.

Cryptocurrency journalist Eleanor Terrett shed new light on the infamous SEC hack that occurred on January 9. The hack, which led to an unauthorized early announcement regarding the approval of Bitcoin Spot ETFs, is being investigated by several outside agencies, including the SEC, the Office of the Inspector General, and the FBI

The last update from the SEC on January 22 showed that the investigation was continuing. However, Terrett's statement reveals that the SEC's Office of Inspector General (OIG) has appointed an independent company to review the information security program, which includes cybersecurity and infrastructure security, in 2023. Upon examination, it was determined that the program was incomplete; This fact was not widely known because the report was located inconspicuously on the SEC's website and was dated December 20, 2023

According to CoinDesk, the fallout from the hack was significant, with losses of approximately $90 million reported in Bitcoin liquidations. Despite the seriousness of the incident, SEC Chairman Gary Gensler did not mention this report in his responses to members of Congress about the hack.

This situation raises serious questions about the SEC's stance on cybersecurity and its accountability in the face of such incidents. Terrett poses a thought-provoking question: “Imagine what the SEC would do if a public company became aware of a security vulnerability, failed to fix it, and was then hacked? Would the SEC have any reaction?

$BTC $ETH $BNB

Avertissement : comprend des opinions de tiers. Il ne s’agit pas d’un conseil financier. Peut inclure du contenu sponsorisé. Consultez les CG.
0
Découvrez les dernières actus sur les cryptos
⚡️ Prenez part aux dernières discussions sur les cryptos
💬 Interagissez avec vos créateur(trice)s préféré(e)s
👍 Profitez du contenu qui vous intéresse
Adresse e-mail/Numéro de téléphone
Créateur pertinent

Découvrez-en plus sur le créateur

--
Fidelity manager Timmer: Only one thing is needed for Bitcoin to break a new record Fidelity manager Jurrien Timmer, one of the names followed on social media with his market evaluations from time to time, stated that network losses in Bitcoin have slowed down, but the price continues to remain high and said, "This continuous record is being prevented. The network must constantly accelerate in order for new increases to occur." Although it fell after the non-agricultural employment data announced in the USA last week, Bitcoin, which rose after this week's inflation figures and the Fed's decision, could not exceed the 70 thousand dollars level again. While investors questioned whether the upward trend was over, Fidelity manager Jurrien Timmer stated that new peaks could only come with the growth of the Bitcoin network. “The record may come with the thesis of financial dominance” Making some evaluations on his account on X, Fidelity's global macro manager drew attention to the discrepancy between price and adaptation and said: "Network growth in Bitcoin has slowed in recent months. However, we see that the price also increases and remains high. This price-adoption discrepancy may actually be behind Bitcoin's failure to break new records. Bitcoin price is swinging like a pendulum around its growth curve and will continue to swing. Therefore, for records to be achieved, the network needs to start growing again. How will this happen? Perhaps with the arrival of the next phase of the fiscal dominance thesis..." The fiscal dominance thesis mentioned by Timmer is based on the incompatibility of countries' fiscal and monetary policies. While taxation, government expenditures and debt purchases constitute fiscal policies, the central bank's monetary policies can be ineffective from time to time. This situation constitutes the financial dominance thesis. $BTC $ETH $BNB
--
Tesla shareholders took Elon Musk and company management to court Tesla shareholders took Elon Musk and company management to court for allegedly directing resources and talent to external artificial intelligence startup xAI. While this move caused uncertainty in the company's internal structure and position in the market, shareholders resorted to legal action to protect their investments. Tesla shareholders took CEO Elon Musk and company management to court. Allegedly, Musk transferred Tesla's artificial intelligence resources and talented personnel to his own initiative, xAI. This situation is thought to harm Tesla's competitiveness. The case was registered on the day the vote was taken to cancel Musk's large pay package. Shareholders argue that Musk and the board of directors betrayed the interests of Tesla and its shareholders with these actions and demand compensation for their losses. Tesla shareholders have filed a lawsuit in Delaware court against the company's CEO, Elon Musk, and his board of directors. The plaintiffs allege that Musk funneled Tesla's valuable AI resources and talented staff into his own startup, xAI. Shareholders claim that this situation harms Tesla's competitiveness. The case was recorded on the same day a vote was taken to cancel Musk's massive pay package. Allegedly, Musk raised funds for xAI using information about Tesla's artificial intelligence and autonomous driving technologies and transferred important names from the company in the process. In particular, Tesla's computer vision team leader Ethan Knight's transition to xAI in March 2024 is noteworthy. Shareholders also point to a period in which Musk diverted Nvidia GPUs, which were vital for Tesla, to company #xAI and X, and said that these GPUs were not necessary for Tesla. The plaintiffs argue that Musk and the board of directors betrayed the interests of Tesla and its shareholders with these actions and demand compensation for their damages.
--
Plan du site
Cookie Preferences
CGU de la plateforme