Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin, has never revealed his true identity and has remained anonymous since the invention of the cryptocurrency in 2009. There are several reasons why he may have chosen to do so:
...
Privacy: Satoshi may have wanted to protect his privacy and avoid unwanted attention from the media or government agencies.
Security: By remaining anonymous, Satoshi could avoid becoming a target for hackers or other malicious actors who may have tried to steal his Bitcoins or compromise his identity.
Decentralization: One of the key principles of Bitcoin is decentralization, which means that no single person or entity controls the network. By staying anonymous, Satoshi ensured that he did not become the de facto leader of the Bitcoin community, which could have undermined the decentralized nature of the network.
Ideological reasons: Satoshi may have believed that Bitcoin should be a truly decentralized and democratic system, where everyone has an equal say in how the network operates. By remaining anonymous, he avoided creating a cult of personality around himself and allowed others to contribute to the development of Bitcoin without being influenced by his personal views or biases.
In Summary, the decision to remain anonymous was a deliberate one on Satoshi's part, and it has helped to maintain the integrity and independence of Bitcoin as a decentralized network. Like now the current FUD from SEC, if Satoshi Nakamoto was a known person what do you think could happen to him? Does it make sense for him to remain an anonymous person?