The Catizen project has been making waves recently, but not necessarily for the right reasons. Many in the community are questioning its fairness and intent.

Consider this: you invest your time and energy into a game, only to receive a mere 2 tokens as a reward. Yes, just 2 tokens for most of the participants in the airdrop. In contrast, those who spent more money on in-game purchases received much more generous rewards.

This disparity raises a critical question: Is Catizen truly focused on building a strong community, or is it simply trying to extract more money from players who are willing to spend?

The selective nature of these rewards has led some to wonder if the project genuinely values its community or if it's just another money-making scheme. While it’s common for projects to encourage spending, when the majority of the community receives little to nothing, it can come across as exploitative.

Is this a calculated tactic, or does it reveal deeper issues within the project?

When you compare Catizen’s airdrop strategy to other recent launches, the situation becomes even more questionable. Take $NOT , for example, which launched at $0.010. Despite its modest start, it allocated thousands of tokens to each participant. Similarly, $DOGS launched at just $0.0012 but still provided significant allocations to its community members. These projects recognized the importance of fostering loyalty by giving their communities a sense of ownership and meaningful rewards.

In contrast, Catizen seems to be taking a different approach, leaving many to speculate whether this could harm its long-term prospects.

However, there might be a method to this apparent madness. What if Catizen is deliberately limiting airdrop allocations to stabilize the token’s price and prevent large-scale sell-offs when it hits exchanges? The real question then becomes whether this strategy will propel the Cati token to new heights, with some speculators predicting it could soar to $0.50 or even $2. If that happens, those 2 tokens might suddenly seem incredibly valuable.

It’s a risky strategy, no doubt. If Catizen manages to pull it off, it could be the first Telegram mini-app project to make significant waves in the blockchain space. But if it fails, it will likely be seen as yet another project that over-promised and under-delivered, leaving its community feeling disappointed.

So, is Catizen poised to be the next big thing, or is it a project that prioritizes big spenders over its broader community? Only time will tell. As the Cati token enters the market, one thing is certain—the community will be paying close attention.

Do you believe this is a stroke of marketing genius by Catizen, or a careless approach that favors only those who spend the most?

#DODOEmpowersMemeIssuance #CATIprediction #BTCReboundsAfterFOMC #OMC #NeiroOnBinance $CATI