Binance Square
Sybil
21,126 views
16 Posts
Hot
Latest
LIVE
LIVE
Lollipeter
--
Binance's BNB Reaches New Heights Amid Legal Resolutions and Strategic PartnershipsBinance's BNB has surged to over $380, marking its highest value since November 2022 and instilling renewed confidence in investors amid legal challenges and #cz_binance departure.$BNB maintains its position as the fourth-largest cryptocurrency, reaching $386 with a 7.70% gain over the past week, attributed to positive sentiment following Binance's settlement with US authorities.The rise in BNB's value is also tied to excitement over an airdrop farming campaign by the web3 gaming project, Portal, integrated into Binance's Launchpool for the #PortalTokens airdrop on February 29.Reports from Arkham reveal BNB holders transferred over $400 million to Portal within 24 hours, showcasing community enthusiasm.Starknet's token, $STRK , recently listed on Binance, offers trading pairs like STRK/BTC, STRK/USDT, STRK/FDUSD, and STRK/TRY.Despite challenges, including a #Sybil attack during Starknet's airdrop, recent developments in BNB and the crypto landscape reflect resilience, innovation, and collaboration. Investors and enthusiasts anticipate further growth and opportunities. #Write2Earn #TrendingTopic

Binance's BNB Reaches New Heights Amid Legal Resolutions and Strategic Partnerships

Binance's BNB has surged to over $380, marking its highest value since November 2022 and instilling renewed confidence in investors amid legal challenges and #cz_binance departure.$BNB maintains its position as the fourth-largest cryptocurrency, reaching $386 with a 7.70% gain over the past week, attributed to positive sentiment following Binance's settlement with US authorities.The rise in BNB's value is also tied to excitement over an airdrop farming campaign by the web3 gaming project, Portal, integrated into Binance's Launchpool for the #PortalTokens airdrop on February 29.Reports from Arkham reveal BNB holders transferred over $400 million to Portal within 24 hours, showcasing community enthusiasm.Starknet's token, $STRK , recently listed on Binance, offers trading pairs like STRK/BTC, STRK/USDT, STRK/FDUSD, and STRK/TRY.Despite challenges, including a #Sybil attack during Starknet's airdrop, recent developments in BNB and the crypto landscape reflect resilience, innovation, and collaboration. Investors and enthusiasts anticipate further growth and opportunities. #Write2Earn #TrendingTopic
Why Are Many People Not Receiving Arbitrum’s Airdrop?Arbitrum, a popular layer 2 scaling solution built on Ethereum, recently launched its token and airdropped it to its community. However, many eligible users reported not receiving the airdrop. This is not the first time a layer 2 project has airdropped tokens to its users. Optimism, another Ethereum layer 2 solution, airdropped hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of tokens to its users in May 2022, which sparked a frenzy for airdrops among the crypto community. According to Delphi Digital, the number of active wallets on Arbitrum surged to 1.6 million on December 22, largely due to “airdrop hunters.” While airdrops can attract a large number of users to a project, it also has the potential to cause a steep drop in token value once the airdrop recipients sell their tokens. As a result, projects often try to target “real users” rather than just airdrop hunters. Arbitrum has implemented a variety of conditions to determine which users receive the airdrop. These conditions include usage of the Arbitrum bridge, time spent transacting on the network, number of transactions/interactions with smart contracts, trading volume, liquidity provided, and number of transactions on Arbitrum Nova. The more conditions a user fulfills, the more airdrop they receive. The project has also set time limits for users to qualify for the airdrop, with those who use the platform after the Nitro update on August 31, 2022, receiving only half of the airdrop based on their score. “The purpose of this is to reward those who have supported the project from day one,” Arbitrum said in a statement. Arbitrum has also introduced a “Sybil account” standard to weed out users who use multiple accounts to game the airdrop system. Using data from Nansen and Hop, Arbitrum will create a transaction graph on its network to identify related accounts. The project will then apply various criteria to exclude these accounts from receiving the airdrop. According to Arbitrum, Sybil accounts are those that receive assets from similar wallet addresses, have similar on-chain activities, or are part of a chain of more than 20 accounts that transfer tokens back and forth. All Sybil accounts will not receive Arbitrum’s airdrop. Other projects have also used similar methods to exclude airdrop hunters. Optimism, for example, excluded more than 17,000 wallet addresses during its first airdrop. While airdrops can be an effective way to attract users, it’s clear that projects need to be cautious in their implementation to ensure that they target genuine users and not just those looking for a quick profit. #Sybil #Arbitrum #ARB #ARBairdrop #azcoinnews This article was republished from azcoinnews.com

Why Are Many People Not Receiving Arbitrum’s Airdrop?

Arbitrum, a popular layer 2 scaling solution built on Ethereum, recently launched its token and airdropped it to its community. However, many eligible users reported not receiving the airdrop. This is not the first time a layer 2 project has airdropped tokens to its users.

Optimism, another Ethereum layer 2 solution, airdropped hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of tokens to its users in May 2022, which sparked a frenzy for airdrops among the crypto community.

According to Delphi Digital, the number of active wallets on Arbitrum surged to 1.6 million on December 22, largely due to “airdrop hunters.” While airdrops can attract a large number of users to a project, it also has the potential to cause a steep drop in token value once the airdrop recipients sell their tokens. As a result, projects often try to target “real users” rather than just airdrop hunters.

Arbitrum has implemented a variety of conditions to determine which users receive the airdrop. These conditions include usage of the Arbitrum bridge, time spent transacting on the network, number of transactions/interactions with smart contracts, trading volume, liquidity provided, and number of transactions on Arbitrum Nova.

The more conditions a user fulfills, the more airdrop they receive. The project has also set time limits for users to qualify for the airdrop, with those who use the platform after the Nitro update on August 31, 2022, receiving only half of the airdrop based on their score.

“The purpose of this is to reward those who have supported the project from day one,” Arbitrum said in a statement.

Arbitrum has also introduced a “Sybil account” standard to weed out users who use multiple accounts to game the airdrop system. Using data from Nansen and Hop, Arbitrum will create a transaction graph on its network to identify related accounts. The project will then apply various criteria to exclude these accounts from receiving the airdrop.

According to Arbitrum, Sybil accounts are those that receive assets from similar wallet addresses, have similar on-chain activities, or are part of a chain of more than 20 accounts that transfer tokens back and forth. All Sybil accounts will not receive Arbitrum’s airdrop.

Other projects have also used similar methods to exclude airdrop hunters. Optimism, for example, excluded more than 17,000 wallet addresses during its first airdrop. While airdrops can be an effective way to attract users, it’s clear that projects need to be cautious in their implementation to ensure that they target genuine users and not just those looking for a quick profit.

#Sybil #Arbitrum #ARB #ARBairdrop #azcoinnews

This article was republished from azcoinnews.com

Understanding Sybil Attacks in Peer-to-Peer Networks A Sybil attack is a cyber attack where a malicious entity generates and manages multiple fake identities or nodes on a peer-to-peer network to exert undue influence. The attacker fabricates numerous pseudonymous identities that appear as independent entities, with the goal of outnumbering and dominating the legitimate nodes. In executing a Sybil attack, the attacker sets up a multitude of fake accounts, nodes, or identities within a network. These false identities are then employed to manipulate the network’s functions, affect voting outcomes, or skew consensus mechanisms by overwhelming genuine nodes. This type of attack takes advantage of the open and pseudonymous nature of peer-to-peer networks, where creating identities is relatively easy and validation is challenging. By controlling a significant portion of the nodes, the attacker can potentially censor transactions, facilitate double-spending, or generally disrupt the network’s functionality. In essence, Sybil attacks threaten the integrity and reliability of peer-to-peer networks by allowing a single malicious actor to assume multiple false identities and gain a disproportionate level of control. This undermines the decentralized nature of these networks and poses significant risks to their operations. Therefore, understanding and mitigating Sybil attacks is crucial for maintaining the security and trustworthiness of peer-to-peer systems. #Sybil #CryptoAnalysis📈📉🐋📅🚀
Understanding Sybil Attacks in Peer-to-Peer Networks

A Sybil attack is a cyber attack where a malicious entity generates and manages multiple fake identities or nodes on a peer-to-peer network to exert undue influence. The attacker fabricates numerous pseudonymous identities that appear as independent entities, with the goal of outnumbering and dominating the legitimate nodes.

In executing a Sybil attack, the attacker sets up a multitude of fake accounts, nodes, or identities within a network. These false identities are then employed to manipulate the network’s functions, affect voting outcomes, or skew consensus mechanisms by overwhelming genuine nodes.

This type of attack takes advantage of the open and pseudonymous nature of peer-to-peer networks, where creating identities is relatively easy and validation is challenging. By controlling a significant portion of the nodes, the attacker can potentially censor transactions, facilitate double-spending, or generally disrupt the network’s functionality.

In essence, Sybil attacks threaten the integrity and reliability of peer-to-peer networks by allowing a single malicious actor to assume multiple false identities and gain a disproportionate level of control. This undermines the decentralized nature of these networks and poses significant risks to their operations. Therefore, understanding and mitigating Sybil attacks is crucial for maintaining the security and trustworthiness of peer-to-peer systems.

#Sybil #CryptoAnalysis📈📉🐋📅🚀
⚡ LayerZero announced that they have begun collaborating with Chaos and Nansen to find sybils. During the analysis, all transactions of each user related to LayerZero will be taken into account. The report will be published after the self-reporting deadline (May 18). Users Who accidentally Reported their account As Sybil can cancel the error Until May 18. 🅃🄮đŸ„ČđŸ„·đŸ„°đŸ„œđŸ„łđŸ…ƒđŸ„žđŸ„żđŸ…‚123 #Sybil #LayerZero
⚡ LayerZero announced that they have begun collaborating with Chaos and Nansen to find sybils.

During the analysis, all transactions of each user related to LayerZero will be taken into account.
The report will be published after the self-reporting deadline (May 18).

Users Who accidentally Reported their account As Sybil can cancel the error Until May 18.

🅃🄮đŸ„ČđŸ„·đŸ„°đŸ„œđŸ„łđŸ…ƒđŸ„žđŸ„żđŸ…‚123

#Sybil #LayerZero
LIVE
--
Bullish
#LayerZero has shaved 803,093 wallets The sybil self-report phase has now concluded. Each self-reported address will receive 15% of its intended token allocation, with the remaining 85% returning to qualified users. Between the sybil self-report and analysis by LayerZero, #chaoslabs , and #Nansen , 803,093 addresses were identified as potential #Sybil . The goal of this initial sybil analysis was to identify industrial sybil clusters. We initially flagged over 2 million addresses as potential sybils but applied stricter criteria to minimize false positives. The full list of self-reported addresses and those identified in the initial analysis conducted by LayerZero, Chaos, and Nansen you can find on LayerZero Twitter page
#LayerZero has shaved 803,093 wallets

The sybil self-report phase has now concluded. Each self-reported address will receive 15% of its intended token allocation, with the remaining 85% returning to qualified users.

Between the sybil self-report and analysis by LayerZero, #chaoslabs , and #Nansen , 803,093 addresses were identified as potential #Sybil .

The goal of this initial sybil analysis was to identify industrial sybil clusters. We initially flagged over 2 million addresses as potential sybils but applied stricter criteria to minimize false positives.

The full list of self-reported addresses and those identified in the initial analysis conducted by LayerZero, Chaos, and Nansen you can find on LayerZero Twitter page
WHAT IS "SYBIL" AND HOW TO AVOID IT?FOR AIRDROP HUNTERS... When you farm an airdrop you must follow simple rules such as: DYOR the projecttest the platform/game/dappjoin socialsbe active and make transactionsdo NOT do exact same things on the same time on the same project via different wallets - this will turn you into a "SYBIL mode" which is.. In the context of cryptocurrency, a Sybil attack is a malicious attempt to gain undue influence or control over a decentralized network by creating numerous fake identities. This can be achieved by using low-cost or free internet services or by exploiting vulnerabilities in the network's identity verification process. How Sybil Attacks Work A Sybil attacker can use fake identities to perform various actions, such as: Manipulating consensus mechanisms: By creating a large number of fake identities, attackers can outvote honest nodes and alter the consensus rules of the network. This could allow them to double-spend coins, prevent legitimate transactions from being processed, or even halt the network altogether.Influencing governance: In some decentralized networks, certain decisions are made through community voting or governance polls. Sybil attackers can flood the network with fake votes to sway the outcome of these polls and gain control over the network's governance.Dominating airdrops: Airdrops are a common marketing strategy in the crypto space, where tokens are distributed to users based on specific criteria. Sybil attackers can create numerous fake identities to maximize their airdrop rewards, effectively stealing from other participants. Examples of Sybil Attacks in Crypto Monero's RingCT Upgrade: In 2018, an attacker attempted to manipulate the voting process for Monero's RingCT upgrade by creating over 40,000 fake identities. However, the Monero community was able to detect and invalidate these fake votes, preventing the attacker from influencing the outcome.Stealing Uniswap V1 Liquidity: In 2019, an attacker exploited a vulnerability in Uniswap V1's liquidity pool system to create millions of fake identities. This allowed them to siphon off a significant portion of the liquidity pool, causing significant losses for other users. Preventing Sybil Attacks Several strategies can be employed to mitigate the risk of Sybil attacks in decentralized networks: Reputation systems: Networks can implement reputation systems that reward honest behavior and penalize malicious activity. This can make it more difficult for Sybil attackers to gain traction.Collaborative identity verification: Networks can collaborate to verify the identities of their users. This can help to identify and eliminate fake accounts before they can cause harm.Utilizing multiple verification factors: Networks can require multiple verification factors, such as KYC (Know Your Customer) procedures, to ensure the authenticity of user identities.Implementing Sybil-resistant consensus mechanisms: Some consensus mechanisms are inherently more resistant to Sybil attacks, such as Proof of Stake (PoS) systems that require network participants to stake a significant amount of cryptocurrency to participate in the consensus process. Thanks for reading, following and supporting guys! 🙏 #airdropking #Sybil #attack #CryptoNewsđŸ”’đŸ“°đŸš« #educational $BTC

WHAT IS "SYBIL" AND HOW TO AVOID IT?

FOR AIRDROP HUNTERS...

When you farm an airdrop you must follow simple rules such as:
DYOR the projecttest the platform/game/dappjoin socialsbe active and make transactionsdo NOT do exact same things on the same time on the same project via different wallets - this will turn you into a "SYBIL mode" which is..

In the context of cryptocurrency, a Sybil attack is a malicious attempt to gain undue influence or control over a decentralized network by creating numerous fake identities. This can be achieved by using low-cost or free internet services or by exploiting vulnerabilities in the network's identity verification process.

How Sybil Attacks Work
A Sybil attacker can use fake identities to perform various actions, such as:
Manipulating consensus mechanisms: By creating a large number of fake identities, attackers can outvote honest nodes and alter the consensus rules of the network. This could allow them to double-spend coins, prevent legitimate transactions from being processed, or even halt the network altogether.Influencing governance: In some decentralized networks, certain decisions are made through community voting or governance polls. Sybil attackers can flood the network with fake votes to sway the outcome of these polls and gain control over the network's governance.Dominating airdrops: Airdrops are a common marketing strategy in the crypto space, where tokens are distributed to users based on specific criteria. Sybil attackers can create numerous fake identities to maximize their airdrop rewards, effectively stealing from other participants.

Examples of Sybil Attacks in Crypto
Monero's RingCT Upgrade: In 2018, an attacker attempted to manipulate the voting process for Monero's RingCT upgrade by creating over 40,000 fake identities. However, the Monero community was able to detect and invalidate these fake votes, preventing the attacker from influencing the outcome.Stealing Uniswap V1 Liquidity: In 2019, an attacker exploited a vulnerability in Uniswap V1's liquidity pool system to create millions of fake identities. This allowed them to siphon off a significant portion of the liquidity pool, causing significant losses for other users.
Preventing Sybil Attacks
Several strategies can be employed to mitigate the risk of Sybil attacks in decentralized networks:
Reputation systems: Networks can implement reputation systems that reward honest behavior and penalize malicious activity. This can make it more difficult for Sybil attackers to gain traction.Collaborative identity verification: Networks can collaborate to verify the identities of their users. This can help to identify and eliminate fake accounts before they can cause harm.Utilizing multiple verification factors: Networks can require multiple verification factors, such as KYC (Know Your Customer) procedures, to ensure the authenticity of user identities.Implementing Sybil-resistant consensus mechanisms: Some consensus mechanisms are inherently more resistant to Sybil attacks, such as Proof of Stake (PoS) systems that require network participants to stake a significant amount of cryptocurrency to participate in the consensus process.

Thanks for reading, following and supporting guys! 🙏
#airdropking #Sybil #attack #CryptoNewsđŸ”’đŸ“°đŸš« #educational $BTC
Explore the latest crypto news
âšĄïž Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number