Binance Square
Runes
333 vues
3 Publications
Hot
Latest
LIVE
LIVE
Daily Crypto
--
Magic Eden, a leading NFT marketplace, has expanded its support for Bitcoin Runes, following its successful investment in Bitcoin Ordinals, a popular and growing cryptocurrency. #MagicEden #BullorBear #nft #bitcoin #Runes
Magic Eden, a leading NFT marketplace, has expanded its support for Bitcoin Runes, following its successful investment in Bitcoin Ordinals, a popular and growing cryptocurrency.

#MagicEden #BullorBear #nft #bitcoin #Runes
Bitcoin Ecosystem Evolution: A Recap of Key DevelopmentsIn recent times, the #Bitcoin ecosystem has witnessed significant developments with the emergence of protocols like #Ordinals , #BRC20 tokens, and the latest proposal, Runes. Ordinals: - Introduced earlier, Ordinals brought a novel concept of numbering satoshis (sats) in the order they are mined, initially applied for non-fungible tokens (NFTs) directly on the Bitcoin blockchain. - The rise of BRC-20 tokens followed, utilizing the Ordinals protocol for fungible tokens on Bitcoin, resulting in a surge of meme tokens. However, this created network congestion due to inefficient processes and exorbitant transaction fees. BRC-20 Tokens: - Enabled fungible tokens on Bitcoin but faced criticism for network congestion and spamming via unused UTXOs (Unspent Transaction Outputs), clogging the Bitcoin network. - Despite issues, BRC-20 tokens attained a market cap of $1 billion in a short span. Runes Proposal: - Casey Rodarmor proposed #Runes as a solution to the inefficiencies of BRC-20 tokens, aiming for a simplified and UTXO-based protocol for Bitcoin. - Runes protocol avoids spamming #UTXOs , focusing on efficient and responsible UTXO management. - Unlike BRC-20, Runes protocol doesn’t rely on off-chain data, native tokens, or witness-based transactions, presenting a more streamlined approach. Comparison - Runes vs. BRC-20: - Runes emphasizes a UTXO-based model, addressing issues of spam and inefficiency faced by BRC-20 tokens. - BRC-20 tokens faced criticism due to network congestion, high fees, and reliance on inefficient processes, leading to the quest for alternatives like Runes. Implications and Uncertainties: - Runes' introduction brings potential benefits such as compatibility with the Lightning Network and improved user experience. - Uncertainties remain regarding the widespread adoption of Runes, given the entrenched position of BRC-20 and its established network effects among users and developers. Conclusion: - While Runes offers a technically robust solution, the established network effects of BRC-20 and uncertainties about Runes' future pose challenges to its widespread adoption. - Rodarmor’s proposal highlights ongoing exploration for innovative solutions in the Bitcoin ecosystem, demonstrating the importance of efficient, transparent protocols that add value to users. ---

Bitcoin Ecosystem Evolution: A Recap of Key Developments

In recent times, the #Bitcoin ecosystem has witnessed significant developments with the emergence of protocols like #Ordinals , #BRC20 tokens, and the latest proposal, Runes.
Ordinals:
- Introduced earlier, Ordinals brought a novel concept of numbering satoshis (sats) in the order they are mined, initially applied for non-fungible tokens (NFTs) directly on the Bitcoin blockchain.
- The rise of BRC-20 tokens followed, utilizing the Ordinals protocol for fungible tokens on Bitcoin, resulting in a surge of meme tokens. However, this created network congestion due to inefficient processes and exorbitant transaction fees.
BRC-20 Tokens:
- Enabled fungible tokens on Bitcoin but faced criticism for network congestion and spamming via unused UTXOs (Unspent Transaction Outputs), clogging the Bitcoin network.
- Despite issues, BRC-20 tokens attained a market cap of $1 billion in a short span.
Runes Proposal:
- Casey Rodarmor proposed #Runes as a solution to the inefficiencies of BRC-20 tokens, aiming for a simplified and UTXO-based protocol for Bitcoin.
- Runes protocol avoids spamming #UTXOs , focusing on efficient and responsible UTXO management.
- Unlike BRC-20, Runes protocol doesn’t rely on off-chain data, native tokens, or witness-based transactions, presenting a more streamlined approach.
Comparison - Runes vs. BRC-20:
- Runes emphasizes a UTXO-based model, addressing issues of spam and inefficiency faced by BRC-20 tokens.
- BRC-20 tokens faced criticism due to network congestion, high fees, and reliance on inefficient processes, leading to the quest for alternatives like Runes.
Implications and Uncertainties:
- Runes' introduction brings potential benefits such as compatibility with the Lightning Network and improved user experience.
- Uncertainties remain regarding the widespread adoption of Runes, given the entrenched position of BRC-20 and its established network effects among users and developers.
Conclusion:
- While Runes offers a technically robust solution, the established network effects of BRC-20 and uncertainties about Runes' future pose challenges to its widespread adoption.
- Rodarmor’s proposal highlights ongoing exploration for innovative solutions in the Bitcoin ecosystem, demonstrating the importance of efficient, transparent protocols that add value to users.
---