LIVE
USDT-LEE
@Square-Creator-3f72c8eda2a7
Following
Followers
Liked
Shared
See original
Due to suspected multiple violations of federal reporting agreements, American billionaire Musk and his space exploration company (SpaceX) will face multiple military reviews.
Due to suspected multiple violations of federal reporting agreements, American billionaire Musk and his space exploration company (SpaceX) will face multiple military reviews, involving sensitive issues such as intelligence leaks.
Joint review by multiple departments
The U.S. (New York Times) reported on the 18th that Musk and SpaceX are currently facing three reviews from the U.S. Air Force, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, and the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security.
Musk, file photo
Multiple insiders have revealed that the roots of this series of reviews stem from Musk and SpaceX's repeated violations of federal reporting regulations, underreporting or concealing many itinerary arrangements, including important details of his meetings with certain foreign leaders. According to government confidentiality regulations, Musk not only has to report his travel abroad to the Defense Department, but his private life also needs to ensure a certain level of transparency. However, Musk has not adhered to such regulations since at least 2021.
Joint review by multiple departments
The U.S. (New York Times) reported on the 18th that Musk and SpaceX are currently facing three reviews from the U.S. Air Force, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, and the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security.
Musk, file photo
Multiple insiders have revealed that the roots of this series of reviews stem from Musk and SpaceX's repeated violations of federal reporting regulations, underreporting or concealing many itinerary arrangements, including important details of his meetings with certain foreign leaders. According to government confidentiality regulations, Musk not only has to report his travel abroad to the Defense Department, but his private life also needs to ensure a certain level of transparency. However, Musk has not adhered to such regulations since at least 2021.
See original
Exchange U for Gold
LIVE
cheems
--
Which group friend is so unfortunate?
Zhang San used a VPN to bypass restrictions and made a profit by buying low and selling high in USDT. Since bypassing restrictions is illegal, the profits made during trading were confiscated, and he was fined 15,000. Even his phone and computer were confiscated as illegal tools. This case reminds us of last year when a programmer worked while bypassing restrictions and ultimately had over a million in income confiscated due to the behavior being deemed illegal. Some say that the nature of a programmer's work and trading is different; one is a work-related activity, while trading is illegal or at least a risk that one must bear. However, currently, cryptocurrency trading is not illegal, so the situation is similar to this case. If bypassing restrictions is illegal and the profits from trading are deemed illegal gains, then it is almost just a matter of an announcement stating that bypassing restrictions to trade cryptocurrencies is not allowed, otherwise, the profits from trading will be confiscated. The key controversy in this case lies in whether the illegal gains from bypassing restrictions can be included under Article 14 of the 'Interim Regulations on the Management of International Networking of Computer Information Networks,' which states that the profits from trading while bypassing restrictions are considered illegal gains, resulting in a fine of 15,000 and confiscation of trading profits amounting to 90,000.
All profits from trading while bypassing restrictions were directly confiscated; it’s truly unfortunate.
Zhang San used a VPN to bypass restrictions and made a profit by buying low and selling high in USDT. Since bypassing restrictions is illegal, the profits made during trading were confiscated, and he was fined 15,000. Even his phone and computer were confiscated as illegal tools. This case reminds us of last year when a programmer worked while bypassing restrictions and ultimately had over a million in income confiscated due to the behavior being deemed illegal. Some say that the nature of a programmer's work and trading is different; one is a work-related activity, while trading is illegal or at least a risk that one must bear. However, currently, cryptocurrency trading is not illegal, so the situation is similar to this case. If bypassing restrictions is illegal and the profits from trading are deemed illegal gains, then it is almost just a matter of an announcement stating that bypassing restrictions to trade cryptocurrencies is not allowed, otherwise, the profits from trading will be confiscated. The key controversy in this case lies in whether the illegal gains from bypassing restrictions can be included under Article 14 of the 'Interim Regulations on the Management of International Networking of Computer Information Networks,' which states that the profits from trading while bypassing restrictions are considered illegal gains, resulting in a fine of 15,000 and confiscation of trading profits amounting to 90,000.
All profits from trading while bypassing restrictions were directly confiscated; it’s truly unfortunate.
See original
Is DOG a Shitcoin?
Quoted content has been removed
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
BinanceAlphaAlert
431,641 views
1,328 Posts
Binance Alpha Announces Third Batch of Projects: A Diverse Lineup Across Blockchain Ecosystems
Binance News
26 Likes
10.2k views
USJoblessClaimsFall
125,849 views
475 Posts
GrayscaleSUITrust
43,085 views
240 Posts
