How to solve the problem of risk control of exchange when depositing and withdrawing coins? (From Coinsradar.net)
Yesterday, a fan reported that he was risk controlled by the exchange.
The fan was selling U off-site, and was risk controlled when withdrawing coins from the exchange to other people's wallet addresses. The exchange auditor asked the fan to explain the situation and provide information about the coin receiving platform.
Even if the fan proved that he was simply selling U off-site, the exchange still did not give a solution.
The reason is that "you have a transaction with a risky address"!
In fact, this kind of risk control of the exchange is equivalent to the "protective stop payment" of a bank card, which will be triggered as long as you have a transaction with a risky account.
The difference is that bank cards are risk controlled by Uncle's anti-fraud system, and virtual currency is risk controlled by the exchange's anti-X system.
Note that all coin receiving addresses can be monitored by the exchange!
When you withdraw coins to a fraud platform, a risky wallet address, a WD platform, etc., the exchange will remind you that "according to the system, this transaction has the risk of being deceived, and the coin receiving address is a risky address."
Just like when you transfer money to a risky "payment fort", it reminds you that you may be cheated and refuses the transaction; when you transfer money to a risky card number, the anti-fraud center calls you to tell you to prevent being cheated. It is the same logic.
Believe in big data and all high-tech.
What is a risky address?
The address for receiving coins reported by multiple users as being cheated.
The address for receiving coins by hackers.
The address for receiving coins involved in the case.
The address for charging and withdrawing coins from black, gray, fraud, and WD platforms.
The address that meets the "X money" model. (This is why most people are subject to risk control by exchanges.)
For example, multiple addresses transfer coins to the same address, and the address transfers the collected coins to a fixed "coin receiving address"; then, the fixed coin receiving address transfers the coins to different addresses.
"The same address and multiple people" have had transactions, which can easily be listed as a "risky address" by the exchange.
How to avoid exchange risk control?
There are two situations: "need to buy coins at the exchange" and "no need for the exchange".
1. Need to buy coins at the exchange and withdraw coins to other platforms.
In this case, after we buy U on the exchange, we transfer U to the exchange's own WEB3 wallet, and then transfer it to other wallets.
There is a logic here. Transferring U from the exchange to the exchange's own WEB3 wallet will not be risk-controlled, which is equivalent to depositing micro money into the zero-balance account.
Using a WEB3 wallet to transfer to other wallets will not be subject to risk control (wallet to wallet). If the WEB3 wallet restricts frequent deposits and withdrawals, it is contrary to the official propaganda that the WEB3 wallet is decentralized.
2. No exchange is needed.
This depends on your own ability! After all, everyone has different ways, you can leave a message to tell the newbies. #内容挖矿
To be honest, as long as you are a normal user of the exchange and do not do those things that are borderline black and gray, you will not be subject to risk control. In a sense, the exchange is safer than the wallet.
Wallets are easy to be stolen (malicious multi-signature), but exchanges are not!
Follow me! Get more information about the currency circle~
